Their emissions will go up for sure as their industrialization continues. They also promised at Paris targets they knew were achievable and not what was necessarily desirable to lower emissions and focus on emissions intensity ( co2 per unit activity whatever that means) instead of cuts.
Thanks I have read the article. China wants to have its own peace of cut, whatever that means. Is this enough to claim they are breaking it?
“The pathway and means for reaching this goal, and the tempo and intensity, should be and must be determined by ourselves, and never under the sway of others,” Xi stated, per the New York Times.
:This is what this article says.
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/19/us-china-climate-talks-kerry
Yes
Xi just said on Wednesday they’ll ignore Paris agreement and they’re already the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter. They’ve building coal plants like crazy. You need to learn more.
They’ve already violated so many agreements. EVs are a future tech and big business if it wasn’t they wouldn’t be pouring money into it for the climate
I don’t understand the motivation of climate change deniers. Let’s just assume climate change is false and scam, nothing will happen if we don’t act.
There are 194 states and EU joined Paris Agreement. What’s the outcome of fighting it? Even China, the mass economic entity in the middle of industrialization, has agreed to lower emissions by 20%. You think they are just fool? What do you expect from fighting it? Win and enjoy life? Not likely. It is to everyone’s best interest to adapt to global theme. This is the trend.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parties_to_the_Paris_Agreement
China will sign anything and violate it at will. So what if 194 states signed something do you think this is proof of something? The climate cult think they can actually tell you temperatures 125,000 years ago!
Power. We don’t need any more Kennedy’s, Clinton’s or Bush’s they’ve done way too much damage to the country
anyone following nostr:npub1m8d6pcrjhke48hasqgx7zkgjdt68u60px04frw753697mcmnyr3q365d6q needs to seriously reevaluate whether they want to endorse someone with such fetid beliefs nostr:note1fk2ckw58wujkrpau7much6n92l3rrhm2sq5vtdyscquuvh45xygs0u2p02
If they’re following they obv agree homo
I have many problems with RFK Jr. and his positions, but I welcome the discussion on sound money and the use of fiat to fund the endless wars.
If you haven’t read Judy Shelton’s paper on gold backed bonds it’s worth a read. I’d bet RFK and his team have read it and her other writings on the subject.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2241651
She credits Alan Greenspan, of all people, and an article he wrote in the WSJ in 1981 as the inspiration for the idea.
Greenspan was a disaster just like bernanke
Bison placenta
Same in Germany in the 30s they cooperated to destroy the state legally it was a race to see who could grab power first. No surprise you had the Molotov Ribbentrop pact
Another part of it is we don’t have leaders for politicians we have prostitutes bought by big corps. They write the laws. It will never end unless we have leaders looking out for people, people to support them, and who have the power to enforce it. There’s no reason we should be feeding chickens a cocktail of anti-depressants for example.
If they really go for Taiwan, then it must be clear even to blindest person that COVID was a scam and deliberate attack. Hybrid warfare.
"China is preparing for war.
Everyone should watch
@Jkylebass
' presentation at the
@HudsonInstitute
, where he connects the dots—between the military, policy, infrastructure, & markets—that point in one direction:
#China is mobilizing for war with 🇺🇸"
https://twitter.com/ianellisjones/status/1680620431668027393?s=20
If you’re in Chinese stocks or Western multinationals that rely on Chinese factories you need to get out now
I go back and forth with this or it being a capital crime. Being locked up for life surely sucks otoh we have to pay for this.