I suspect you protest too much. Nothing in your final paragraph is inconsistent with certain strains of socialism (market anarchism for example) as long as your promotion of individual property rights does not preclude the existence of comcomitant community rights - as afforded by say a certain collectivist and communitarian monetary network that we all know and love.
As a UK citizen, I can confirm that we’ve all had a drink. Up the hills to bedfordshire for this misguided soul.
Yes. It’s “arse” you prudish colonial. Otherwise, no problems here. Move along.
“It has often struck our notice that the course our city runs
Is the same towards men and money.
She has true and worthy sons:
She has good and ancient silver, she has good and recent gold.
These are coins untouched with alloys; everywhere their fame is told;
Not all Hellas holds their equal, not all Barbary far and near.
Gold or silver, each well minted, tested each and ringing clear.
Yet, we never use them!
Others always pass from hand to hand.
Sorry brass just struck last week and branded with a wretched brand.
So with men we know for upright, blameless lives and noble names.
Trained in music and palaestra, freemen's choirs and freemen's games,
These we spurn for men of brass...” - Aristophanes
I suggest you read « l’écriture et différence » for the counter argument to that.
High signals silent movie posts get zaps … if their author allows it.
If you gaze into the abyss long enough, sometimes it waves back.
“As Herder says, there is nothing that must not be fashioned by Man, from humanity to nature (and all the way to God). Nothing is left out, in the final analysis. Here lies the seemingly healthy origin or the sickest totalitarianism.” - Maurice Blanchit
Prescience alert. We all know that the Genesis block makes reference to the “Chancellor on the Brink” headline. But do we ever stop to notice the other messages that are encoded in plain sight on the same front page? I never have. War in Gaza? Eating out for £5? A 99p pint?

Can’t zap. Ergo you are an epiphenomenon. Two stars.
As Yuval Harari would understand if he had ever picked up an anthropological textbook, money is always and everywhere only a technological means of social coordination necessary in situations where individuals are unable to fully trust their peers. A community whose members have implicit shared trust can safely rely on gift exchange and institutions such as pot latch as a safe means of coordinating their energy and have no use of money as a technology.
This is not spyware. This is M&S spyware.
The BBC is now my favourite BTC influencer. https://overcast.fm/+uSfke0ZoQ
I’ve always been drawn to the phenomenological and later post-structuralist definition of violence as ecstasy - namely the capacity of any physical system to overflow, overtake or even negate its own bounds. Radical excess. The dissolution of distinction. Under such an assignation of truth-values, violence can never be chosen. It lies beyond choosing. It is unavowable. Here’s to the ineffable mystery of violence… “cool story bro”
Set up your wallet anon.
It understands. It understands perfectly.
It’s hard to think of a greater, more powerful and more successful example of collectivism than the bitcoin protocol. Here’s to the collective.
A fedimint you can’t zap is an oxymoron.



