88
Enchiridion
88245a23a3f1f11fea192cb77d0791eed1e8f7fbc0358c7c794c0ce2b0ed40e9

I suspect you protest too much. Nothing in your final paragraph is inconsistent with certain strains of socialism (market anarchism for example) as long as your promotion of individual property rights does not preclude the existence of comcomitant community rights - as afforded by say a certain collectivist and communitarian monetary network that we all know and love.

As a UK citizen, I can confirm that we’ve all had a drink. Up the hills to bedfordshire for this misguided soul.

Yes. It’s “arse” you prudish colonial. Otherwise, no problems here. Move along.

“It has often struck our notice that the course our city runs

Is the same towards men and money.

She has true and worthy sons:

She has good and ancient silver, she has good and recent gold.

These are coins untouched with alloys; everywhere their fame is told;

Not all Hellas holds their equal, not all Barbary far and near.

Gold or silver, each well minted, tested each and ringing clear.

Yet, we never use them!

Others always pass from hand to hand.

Sorry brass just struck last week and branded with a wretched brand.

So with men we know for upright, blameless lives and noble names.

Trained in music and palaestra, freemen's choirs and freemen's games,

These we spurn for men of brass...” - Aristophanes

I suggest you read « l’écriture et différence » for the counter argument to that.

High signals silent movie posts get zaps … if their author allows it.

Replying to Avatar John Balkam

COMMUNISM IS A DEATH ECONOMY

Communism is an elaborate scam whereby a small group of charismatic "leaders" convince the masses that all their problems will be solved if all private property is eliminated. However, under communism, property does not get eliminated, it is all just confiscated by the state.

Therefore, under communism, all the property is owned by a small number of elites, and the proletariat lives in extreme poverty "for the greater good." Yeah, right.

Needless to say, communism is a brutal and horrific regime at scale. The atrocities committed by communist members of the USSR and the PRC in modern times are unforgivable, and yet, Marxist ideals are still held in a positive light today in some parts of society.

Perhaps communism is acceptable at a small scale, say, at the family level. One family that shares all of its property with one another and doesn't bother to worry about who owns what is not going to commit atrocities. Even one small community of 50-100 people could probably get away with organizing itself using communist principles.

Where communism becomes a serious problem is when a government attempts to scale it to the masses.

Private property is foundational to civilization. Can we take anyone seriously who legitimately believes that individuals do not deserve to keep the property that they earn through their labor?

Communism, and its close cousin, Socialism, do not work because they are uncivilized. They are systems that require large scale theft and violence to work. No government theft or violence, no Communism or Socialism.

So, by now it should be clear that we can bury these destructive concepts in the 20th century where they belong, right?

For whatever reason, these concepts are still popular. Perhaps it is because we are so accustomed to the death economy, where governments steal our property through taxation and inflation and then use the stolen resources to kill and maim foreign citizens in the name of "freedom and democracy." What a joke.

When you take a good hard look at the USA and the EU for that matter, and how our systems of government actually work, you see that we've become at least partially socialist countries, if not full-fledged communist.

While the USSR was overt and aggressive in its campaign to eliminate private property, the US and the EU are more settle in the way they steal from their populace. Instead of using violence and torture, our modern governments use a more potent weapon - central banking - to commit their sneaky grand theft.

We have all been feeling the weight of inflation in recent years. Have you ever asked yourself, "why do we experience monetary inflation?" Or "who or what is responsible for monetary inflation?"

The answer to those questions is very simple - we experience inflation because our money is issued by a central bank (the Federal Reserve in the US and the European Central Bank in the EU). What is the cause behind inflation? The central bank has the power to create new money out of thin air, with no costs or strings attached. Money doesn't grow on trees. It is created with a few clicks of a mouse on a computer screen.

This is why we have inflation and inflation is a devious and shadowy form of theft. The government and the banks spend inordinate amounts of time trying to explain to us why inflation is good for us. "It helps us grow the economy!" they say.

This is simply not true. All inflation does is take purchasing power away from whoever holds the currency that's being inflated. Plain and simple. It may appear that we're all getting wealthier through inflation. After all, if our stock portfolios are going up and the value of our homes are increasing, we must be getting wealthier, right?

That may be true, if you own assets. When a currency gets inflated, everyone in the economy is forced to find ways to retain their purchasing power. It's a mad dash to compete for scarce, valuable assets before society's purchasing power gets wiped out by inflation.

If you are imprudent, over indebted, or simply don't earn enough money to be able to save and invest into assets, sorry, you lose. There's nothing we can do for you. You have to either accept your fate as a poor person, or join the rat race and climb your way up into the asset holding class.

One of the second order consequences of rampant inflation is that we slowly but surely get a communist system if money printing persists. With a central bank, the charismatic "leaders" don't have to use explicit violence and coercion to steal everyone's property. They can gradually make valuable property unaffordable for the vast majority by inflating the value of desirable assets sky high.

Look at society today, and a small group of "elites" owns most of the property in the form of stocks, real estate, and commodities. The vast majority are living paycheck to paycheck and can barely afford to live. Gee, how did this happen?

Let's face it, we were hoodwinked. We've been scammed. The government, the financial institutions, and the large corporations own us now. They own everything. And they are telling us that by 2030, we will "own nothing, and be happy." Sounds an awful lot like the communist ethos, doesn't it?

Sure enough, the death economy has brought us to our knees. Backdoor communism is the law of the land these days, unless we fight back. But how?

First, we have to stand up to these sociopathic bullies. But a violent revolution will never work. We have to fight back on the economic and ideologic battlefields.

Second, we must harness and master the greatest form of property in human history: #Bitcoin.

When used properly, Bitcoin is unconfiscatable digital property. It is money that can't be inflated or stolen by the government or the central banks.

Forget about the current price in your local currency for a second, and ask yourself, "how valuable is property that no one can steal from me, to me?"

For a lot of us, the answer will be: virtually priceless. Why would we sell property in cyberspace that bad actors can't possibly take from us?

If central banks are the ultimate weapon for communist totalitarians, Bitcoin is the ultimate weapon for freedom fighters who would rather die than live as a slave in a communist system.

We need Bitcoin to finally break free. We need Bitcoin to teach the world that private property is important for human life to flourish on Earth. We need Bitcoin to bury the evil, destructive allure of communism.

Communism is a death economy system. And it must be destroyed for life to improve on Earth.

I do not disagree with much of this, but for historical context it’s worth pointing out that, at least for Marx, Communism was a species of Anarchy. By definition therefore, the notion of a Communist state is an oxymoron. Furthermore, for most European socialists during the early 19th century, the notion of a Socialist society was predicated upon the absence of the state. The Marxist proposal of a Socialist state was widely regarded as a betrayal of said principals. (C.f. The critiques of Proudhon and Bakunin).

“As Herder says, there is nothing that must not be fashioned by Man, from humanity to nature (and all the way to God). Nothing is left out, in the final analysis. Here lies the seemingly healthy origin or the sickest totalitarianism.” - Maurice Blanchit

Prescience alert. We all know that the Genesis block makes reference to the “Chancellor on the Brink” headline. But do we ever stop to notice the other messages that are encoded in plain sight on the same front page? I never have. War in Gaza? Eating out for £5? A 99p pint?

As Yuval Harari would understand if he had ever picked up an anthropological textbook, money is always and everywhere only a technological means of social coordination necessary in situations where individuals are unable to fully trust their peers. A community whose members have implicit shared trust can safely rely on gift exchange and institutions such as pot latch as a safe means of coordinating their energy and have no use of money as a technology.

The BBC is now my favourite BTC influencer. https://overcast.fm/+uSfke0ZoQ

I’ve always been drawn to the phenomenological and later post-structuralist definition of violence as ecstasy - namely the capacity of any physical system to overflow, overtake or even negate its own bounds. Radical excess. The dissolution of distinction. Under such an assignation of truth-values, violence can never be chosen. It lies beyond choosing. It is unavowable. Here’s to the ineffable mystery of violence… “cool story bro”

It’s hard to think of a greater, more powerful and more successful example of collectivism than the bitcoin protocol. Here’s to the collective.