**RT @tabconf:**
TABconf will also have discussion on this. Early September is another good time to learn in person. :)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/tabconf/status/1689764942470156288#m
**Response to @fiatjaf:**
\- Apparently Lightning developers have started to realize it is not a good idea to close a channel in order to redeem a trimmed HTLC -- but it's not clear what they must do instead
\- Simplicity trumps everything
\- Lightning will rely more and more on reputation and game theory
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1689625204106854401#m
The latest @ChaincodeLabs (https://nitter.moomoo.me/ChaincodeLabs) podcast episode with @rusty\_twit (https://nitter.moomoo.me/rusty_twit) is pretty good. Some things I took from it:
\- Rusty wants anyprevout.xyz (https://anyprevout.xyz) and hopes that will happen as soon as possible, but he doesn't have a concrete plan for activation
\- Lightning is currently overcomplicated
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1689625202123042816#m
**RT @Truth_in_Number:**
I saw a post today saying myocarditis deaths were blowing up in the US.
Myocarditis is a very rare cause of death in the US. 2019, it accounted for 0.02% of all deaths in US.
In 2020 myocarditis death rate jumped 9.9%
DROPPED 10.3% in 2021
Dropped 8% in 2022
https://nitter.moomoo.me/Truth_in_Number/status/1689430180690026496#m
If we activate Drivechain and it works we can probably reduce the blocksize to 300kb and be happy forever.
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1689370801470861313#m
**RT @super_testnet:**
These things about bitcoin annoy me a bit: fees are often so high that LN is the only halfway decent option. But LN is not as reliable as bitcoin, transactions fail too often. I \*think\* drivechains would be (1) reliable like bitcoin (2) low fee like LN (3) low chance of theft.
https://nitter.moomoo.me/super_testnet/status/1689332031363149825#m
**RT @BitcoinErrorLog:**
Here's a link to a debate with me and about Drivechains from a year ago @Truthcoin (https://nitter.moomoo.me/Truthcoin) (starts at 3:05:)
I don't remember how comprehensive it is with arguments, but it's at least a chance to hear two people attempting to argue in good faith.
Did I win?
piped.kavin.rocks/zp1B\_i4JlXc?t=11126 (https://piped.kavin.rocks/zp1B_i4JlXc?t=11126)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1689237552606191616#m
We got to 21 episodes, the most bitcoiny number, a perfect time to end the show: piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=pxKLQj6O… (https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=pxKLQj6O0Z4)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1689236390553284608#m
**RT @Truthcoin:**
Bip300 is inevitable, btw
It is the only L2 that:
\\* pays miners +
\\* that you can directly onboard to.
So it will activate via MASF, eventually.
ARK , LN , Federated Chains -- these don't pay miners. No one will pay $10 (or $20) to join those. ARK and LN stop working at that…
https://nitter.moomoo.me/Truthcoin/status/1689038284091998208#m
I bought a domain on namecheap.com (https://namecheap.com). They had two payment options for Bitcoin: Bitpay and BTCPay. For BTCPay they only accepted onchain transactions, but with Bitpay they accepted Lightning.
Guess who won: self-hosted or custodial solution?
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1688970967555444740#m
**RT @johndavies24:**
The same threats that DC could pose already exist. No new threats are added... Unless of course you're afraid that DC bootstraps things that are better than bitcoin (3/3)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/johndavies24/status/1688749612067418112#m
**RT @johndavies24:**
Annoyingly, you arent acknowledging that these centralization forces already exist w/o benefiting BTC (DC would benefit BTC). Considering all non-BTC uses of blockspace (side chains, pegs/wBTC, MM, other chains checkpointing, timestamps, proof of publication, etc)...(2/3)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/johndavies24/status/1688749566668255232#m
**RT @johndavies24:**
This piece wasnt as bad as I expected. I think you paid some lip service to the benefits. You basically said that there could be ways of doing it w/o a SF (bip118), that DC could add meaningless proofs, & the common "don't add another force to miner centralization"... (1/3)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/johndavies24/status/1688749451094216704#m
**RT @BitMEXResearch:**
Absolutely yes!
👕👕👕
@AntPoolofficial (https://nitter.moomoo.me/AntPoolofficial)@foundryservices (https://nitter.moomoo.me/FoundryServices)@F2Pool\_Official (https://nitter.moomoo.me/f2pool_official)@binance (https://nitter.moomoo.me/binance)@ViaBTC (https://nitter.moomoo.me/ViaBTC)@LuxorTechTeam (https://nitter.moomoo.me/LuxorTechTeam)@officialpoolin (https://nitter.moomoo.me/officialpoolin)@BraiinsMining (https://nitter.moomoo.me/BraiinsMining)
nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1688635796247453696#m (https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1688635796247453696#m)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/BitMEXResearch/status/1688638302683832321#m
**RT @Truthcoin:**
Truthfully the reckless thing is to wait yet another 8 years (2015-->2023) before taking action
https://nitter.moomoo.me/Truthcoin/status/1688587719482523652#m
If you have read the @BitMEXResearch (https://nitter.moomoo.me/BitMEXResearch) article, read these comments:
nitter.moomoo.me/super\_testnet/status/1688544017577824256#m (https://nitter.moomoo.me/super_testnet/status/1688544017577824256#m)
https://nitter.moomoo.me/fiatjaf/status/1688547934365786112#m
**RT @SimpleBtcWallet:**
What about 1 btc on same terms?
https://nitter.moomoo.me/SimpleBtcWallet/status/1688041813444046848#m
**RT @callebtc:**
Isolation is key for security. If you build a Lightning-enabled app, you don't want to grant it access to all funds on your node.
Use @LNbits (https://nitter.moomoo.me/lnbits) as an intermediate layer for security to give your app its own wallet. Whatever could go wrong with it, only its own wallet is at risk.
https://nitter.moomoo.me/callebtc/status/1687764285236142080#m