Avatar
Viktor Vsk
8a699686811889186df398c7253e8c4417ce73fe814edeae7ecd81dbde9536ac
Building #saltivka đŸ‡ș🇩 Nostr Friendly Relay (https://saltivka.org) Building #Knowstr — smart Nostr events aggregator (https://github.com/viktorvsk/knowstr) Working to enable people have more activities through the word of mouth between friends, friends of friends and more đŸ€ with https://recar.io and https://valent.network

Yeah, you definitely know better than me who lived through all those events, thanks for educating

Twitter retards on nostr, more each day, its probably a good thing 👍

Tbh, I don’t know why I even finished reading this and even conclusions from linked article after “US drawn rusia into the Ukraine conflict” lies with 3 red flags in a single sentence, but


1) unfortunately bitcoin doesn’t fix wars

2) even if we assume bitcoin long term fixes everything (hundreds of years from

Now? Thousands? Millions?) then we still have to somehow live today and bitcoin even in theory can’t fix wars according to this flawed “theory” unless EVERYONE switches to bitcoin and gets addicted to its infinite advantages

3) US is not the biggest villain on Earth even if it makes things a lot easier to believe in for many not involved people. But if you believe that all problems come from US you can justify that your country is ruled by hamas terrorists or rusian imperialists, you can just say “fuck it, its not my nation and my govt, its not my decisions (or their lack of) made it possible — no, its all because US invented fiat and abuses it, so I’m just another victim, I can’t do anything and just waiting for bitcoin/jesus/allah/messiah to fix this

I stopped at 2 months before because its also 2 month into now. I could also use 1 day before if you prefer. Why? Because 1 day before was the last day of some agreements were working, and they were broken solely by one side.

If you want to go in past more than the last checkpoint of an agreement, then you can pick arbitrary date, what for example rusia is doing with Ukraine right now — they chose a date where USSR existed and want it back. They didn’t chose times of Rus with a center in Kyiv, because it is inconvenient for their war. Same goes for any war — either you play by international laws established with UN after WW2 (which are very far from perfect unfortunately) or you can do whatever you want, you are a terrorist short-term and long term you either a past evil (like Nazi Germany) or one who rewrites the history (what rusia aims for for instance, and HAMAS supports

It with)

Anyway, I’m waiting your “suggestions” for HAMAS, do you suggest to let them leave with what they did and encourage to continue? Are you sure they stop if no Israel exist close to them?

This is what you can’t understand because you are blessed to only hear such news on internet and not even on examples of people you know directly probably. If your child gets murdered by an aggressor you don’t care at all how many aggressor supporters have to be killed to stop the aggressor, to have some sort of “justice” or “revenge” (because justice does not exist, if someone already committed violence and killed a person there is nothing in this world that can back this person to life) and its just an aggressors manipulation in this case to force everyone believe that AFTER aggressor committed a crime, “opponent” has to stick to some moral ground.

Your suggestion of course is just a stupid joke. But lets pretend it has some ground. Ok. Its almost 2 months after Israel started retaliation. And killed a lot of people, thats obviously bad. But 2 months before 7 October, how many people did Israel killed? It seems to me this is closer to zero. So why do you omit your brilliant “suggestions” to HAMAS ? What and more importantly who is gonna do something about them?

So you think sanity is to kill just roughly the same number of people in response right? And its also not insanity to start wars in the first place, right?

You see, philosophical problem that commenters on internet can’t see is that there is no such thing in laws or moral to answer “is it bad to do bad things in response to bad things?” For now, aggressors all over the world manipulate this drawback to force victims to “behave good” in face of others doing whatever they want

Also, internet commenters fail to see is numbers of deaths and ways of deaths and anything else is completely irrelevant to people who were already killed. Or for people whos relatives were killed

And jfyi calling to calm things down and “negotiate”, “freeze conflicts” etc - always only help aggressors to keep doing aggressors things if you learn history

Websites that listed in your profile say otherwise — that you are directly related to software industry and you make money off of it. You are skilled in the area of expertise which less than 1-3% of people are working in. And it happened that this industry today attracts a lot of investments thus making everybody related much more financially stable.

Thats how reality looks like. 100% of population could never be a part of this industry since there would be no one who produces food and water for us, who builds houses and cleans toilets. We are privileged because of how things work right now and it may very well end up suddenly every day.

So the fact that you are able to leave cities and live closer to nature is a consequence of your exceptional skills in area that is profitable. It has nothing to do with bitcoin.

If a regular school teacher today starts using bitcoin, nothing at all changes in their life, completely nothing.

And you think those rat races happen because people chose fiat instead of bitcoin and not because like 99% of people “in bitcoin” are related to software development industry that experiences extreme growth over last 4 decades, right?

Because it goes against the core idea of nostr - decentralization. In general, currently community consensus is that you have to learn without that feature

>>> without endorsement or approval of The Tor Project.

Communism, socialism, authoritarian or “hoho, great guys fighting for greater good <3”?

What protocols are centralized then?

I think for the list of relays you manully produce, it should be like this per relay:

- respond always

- ignore always

- prompt

- auto (let client decide, for instance only auth when kind4 requested etc how some clients have it now)

Also probably the same types of settings shouls be applies for “other relays that happen to be requested” in case of outbox or similar

It would also be great to let user know when and why AUTH is requested by relay. And regarding WHY maybe it makes sense to consider adding it to NIP so that relays could notify why they need auth - is it just a regular hey here is a challenge if you want to AUTH or something critical may be missing without. Maybe relays could add a link to policy (nip-11 seem not to cover this granularly enough)

Also what is important for client auth imo - is to save challenge at let user auth at any given point in time later, to not force user take immediate action and to not break UX because relay sends it before client can react

Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

nostr:npub13f5edp5przy3sm0nnrrj205vgstuuul7s98datn7ekqahh54x6kqufgvmt what are the medium-term plans for https://saltivka.org/ ? Is the goal to make it easy to run by normal people and have "private relay" features? What exactly do you plan to implement that requires AUTH?

Currently I’m planning to make it possible for users to register in old-school way on the platform and create their subrelays in order to allow non-tech, lees-tech and tech users manage topical/community/private relays.

This could partially be viewed as algorithms — you create wss://fiatjaf.saltivka.org and you can either manually store the best memes you find to this relay, or you can hire a team who does this or you use AI/ML for that

Once you have content you think valuable on this relay you start promoting it and have oldshool way of monetizing ads but without platform as middleman

Those subrelays must have granular configurable access policies. I wouldn’t say AUTH is a must for this feature right now but long-term of course its essential

Replying to Avatar greenart7c3

Go to https://coracle.social/settings

There's a authenticate to relays option

Wow, I looked there 3 times and I first seen it in source code but only was able to see it in UI after your post 😂 thanks!

However, this setting seem to have no effect and it does not persist through reloads in any browser: safari, ff, chrome on mac