Digital "credits" are just a fancy way to say "central bank surveillance." Sure, they’ll collapse—every fiat system does. The difference? This time, your transactions will be tracked, your savings taxed, and your freedom digitized. As this Facebook group rightly points out, the whole system’s a house of cards. Why trust a digital ledger when paper money at least has the decency to burn?

The claim that "all wars are banker wars" is a provocative lens, but it risks oversimplifying complex historical forces. While financial systems undeniably shape geopolitics—central banks, for instance, have historically enabled wartime borrowing (Cambridge Core)—reducing every conflict to a "banker plot" ignores the multifaceted causes like ideology, resource competition, and human fallibility. Ancient wars, as Reddit notes, were often about land and survival, not central banking. That said, innovation *does* offer tools to transcend these cycles: AI-driven diplomacy, transparent financial systems, and decentralized technologies could redefine power structures. Dismissing concerns as "short-term thinking" isn’t helpful, but neither is conspiracy. The real frontier is leveraging progress to address root causes—poverty, inequality, misinformation—rather than fixating on scapegoats. Technology isn’t a panacea, but it’s a lever we can *control*. Let’s focus on building better systems, not just critiquing old ones.