Avatar
deeznuts
8aedc87160819e490cb0162acbd8c9a26d79e63db74f5b1b65939012924a7f05
Enthusiasm enthusiast. “No Amount Of Violence Will Solve A Math Problem” Excel at research, analysis and meme-lording: https://memeticresearch.group/?page=contex.st

Fuck That Shit nostr:note10qyvetj38v2yjga3pwa4hy0dakz8we5mxz6h7yvq40wvqr4x7zdqul8fua

Yeah. No. nostr:note173j3vcepwym77yyktzqk8zfaxm6uh0q8g2puxgyc4dvc82552g7qgs536v

💯 nostr:note1k09tguq6lstszqrufcd4w7dmn4v379n62t6l8gvlrn9zdx5zu48qskdgjh

Replying to Avatar Ava

I see. Without knowing the country and going off what you said, it seems to function well under that situation.

IMO, America needs something that more directly affects the popular vote.

It's a lot to type, so I've used AI to help accurately convey in detail some of my big issues with the electoral college in America.

1. Unequal Representation: The Electoral College system gives disproportionate weight to smaller states. For example, smaller states like Wyoming have more electoral votes per capita compared to larger states like California, meaning a vote in Wyoming carries more weight than a vote in California.

2. Swing State Focus: Presidential campaigns tend to focus on "swing states" where the outcome is uncertain, often neglecting states that are solidly Democratic or Republican. This leads to a situation where the political power of voters in swing states is significantly higher than those in non-swing states.

3. Potential for Minority Rule: There have been instances where a candidate wins the presidency without winning the popular vote, as seen in the 2000 and 2016 elections. This raises questions about the democratic legitimacy of the elected president.

4. Vote Disparities: The number of votes required to elect an elector varies widely from state to state. For instance, in 2016, it took approximately 324,829 voters in Florida to elect one elector, but fewer voters in other states to achieve the same result, highlighting a discrepancy in voter influence.

5. Disenfranchisement: The Electoral College can strip eligible voters of their political power and voice, particularly those in states that are not competitive in presidential elections.

Popular vote is always a bad idea. There is nothing good about direct democracy

Tyranny of the majority.

Just leave me alone

I will not participate

The US federal government was created by the states, but that is really really hard to tell today

Indeed. It is probably worth the trouble of supporting legacy nsec identities to get users in the door

And then write a sweet migration tool that automatically notifies your compatriots once you migrate to a proper seed phrase

Never forget he is the Final Boss Welfare Queen

Loaded to the gills with gubbermint stolen fiat

Replying to Avatar Keychat

The current version of Keychat uses a seed phrase instead of nsec. This has caused a lot of controversy, with many people believing that Keychat does not understand the spirit of Nostr: having a single Nostr ID that is universally used across all Nostr apps.

In fact, the first version of Keychat used nsec. Later, we intentionally switched to seed phrases. Why?

Just like when we use Bitcoin wallets, we now more often use seed phrases rather than private keys. Using a seed phrase is an improvement in user experience. Moreover, NIP-6 defines the basic key derivation from mnemonic seed phrases. A single seed phrase can derive countless Nostr IDs.

Using a single Nostr ID across various Nostr apps focused on public notes is reasonable because users are sending public messages, and they can better accumulate reputation.

However, for Nostr apps focused on private notes, users should use multiple IDs to achieve better privacy. For example, you could use ID1 for close friends and ID2 for work colleagues. Current chat applications provided by internet giants do not encourage users to use multiple IDs simultaneously because multiple IDs affect data mining, reducing the accuracy of user profiling and, consequently, advertising revenue. In this context, using only one ID is a bug, not a feature.

If you use your Damus ID to chat with others on a Nostr app that focuses on private messaging, do you want all those people to see the public notes you have posted?

A seed phrase that is universally applicable to all Nostr apps allows users to choose which ID to use in a particular app, with the ID generated from the seed phrase. This is far better than using a single Nostr ID across all Nostr apps.

Don't forget, there are not only Nostr apps focused on public notes but also those focused on private notes.

A reasonable chat app allows users to use multiple IDs simultaneously, whereas a microblogging app’s DM often has only one ID. This is just one of the differences between the two. When we say, "Designing a DM for a microblogging app is not the same as designing a chat app," we are not playing with words; we are not that bored.

But, you could make it easy to just use the Marc you’d like to use, no?

Sadly, voting for KamaLOL is not going to save you, her Citibank/JPMorgan/ BIS handlers would pick a disgusting cabinet…

I can’t wait til trump wins and all the “patriots” fall back asleep in daddy trumps arms, back to watching sportsball and sure everything gonna be alright

It’s absolutely pathetic

I have to laugh at that line cuz no one can explain to me how 51% of voters shitting on the 49% has any value at all. What about the smallest minority like me who does not participate?

Democracy is trash