Avatar
Greg Tonoski
8c61573e1a44c2683de436d705e732871f2cac19df874a8722e97acb9b4f1f41

The Bitcoin Core organisation has "in principle" capitulated.

"It can't be a serious proposal therefore I didn't answer it.

Bitcoiners run node software without that prospective bug so they

already decided against the change. I also care about Bitcoin's

survival and I agree with you. Thank you for Bitcoin Knots which is

more powerful and less buggy Bitcoin node software implementation,

superior to Bitcoin Core." - that reply to nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk and and bitcoindev@googlegroups.com in "[bitcoindev] Relax OP_RETURN standardness restrictions" has been censored (blocked).

Unpopular opinion: self-custody is not about so-called "hardware wallets".

You seem to conflate Bitcoin devs with Bitcoin Core ones.

Test for a Bitcoiner: they don't have the goal to retire.

No, not everyone is equal in social terms. That's the foundation of social "sciences" and that's what everyone sees in the world, I suppose.

There is no financial, sexual, education or other qualified freedom.

Top 3 outcomes of OpenSats grants last year or two.

Bitcoin dominance.

Mining decentralization tool DATUM, Bitcoin Knots rising market share (doubled last year), complacency, no lessons learnt from the 2022-23 spam attack on Bitcoin, Bitcoin Core development corruption, declining count of Lightning channels (), ubiquitous KYC, mempool size, fees trajectory.