Numbers that came from Gaza's Ministry of Health and international NGOs, you mean?

Sure, everything is Hamas now, except you and me :-p

And can I really be sure about you?

"All the world will stand with you together"?

LOL nope, your "plan" is what the Palestinians did after 1948, what the Irish did after the Cromwellian wars, what the Bantu did under apartheid, what Indians did under the Raj, what China did under the Unequal Treaties.

In each case, nothing changed until the oppressed were willing to organise and use force to gain leverage in negotiations.

Israel is the world's largest foreign aid recipient. End the aid, end the genocide.

So 0.1% of 2.2million people is 22,000 people (which Israel themselves said more than that was killed before the ceasefire). We were at 18,000 by Palestinian numbers before the ceasefire and since the ceasefire ended there has already been over a 1000 who have died.

So the final question I have for you is, considering you don’t accept number of deaths from anyone but the ones carrying out the murder in the first place, when exactly will you say that they’ve gone too far? What would it take for you to admit that too many people have been killed so far? This is important, as you’ve agreed there is a limit, but how does one measure that limit in your world? Because surely it’s in the best interest of a murderous apartheid state to deny their crimes…

I’m going to ask one final time, because I’ve asked like 4 times already and each time you give me irrelevant Israeli talking points straight from the IDF press room. I am asking you about your views. I am asking you, at what point is it too much? Or is there no limit? You can give a rough number or even like a percentage of the population…10%? 50% 100% can die for the sake of killing Hamas? You cannot tell me that Israel is doing “very well” if you cannot define what a failure or tragedy looks like.

If you don’t want to answer because you realise how evil it sounds to treat human likes like NPC’s in a game, that’s fine, just say so, but giving me political diversionary answers are pointless for an educated civilised discussion.

So…How much is too much?

Ok, I’ll get to that point shortly; but my question still remains unanswered. Assuming what you’re saying is true, that every single Hamas soldier is hiding directly behind 10 civilians, how many civilians do you think is ok to kill to get to Hamas before you say “ok, this is too much now”? Or is there no limit? Don’t be shy, you can say “kill them all” if you want and if that’s what you believe. I don’t know who you are so there’s no reason to fear any backlash. I just want to know if you feel there are any limits, any red lines one cannot cross, or if you feel killing them all to kill Hamas is justified.

Thanks 👍

That wasn’t my question. My question was, “there are 2.2million people there living, half of them are children. How many of them need to die to achieve ‘the goal’ of killing ‘Hamas’? Or can all of them die to achieve that goal?

The only way to end terrorism is to kill innocent civilians?

Let me agree, for the sake of argument, that this is about “terrorism”, since western governments have been killing innocent civilians to fight “terrorism”, when did it work?

So how many dead civilians is too much “short term pain”? Or is there no “too much?”? Do you support the killing of all of them if required?

So how many dead civilians is too much “short term pain”? Or is there no “too much?”? Do you support the killing of all of them if required?

Ok, so I watched it again to try to understand your point and your reaction, and I still can’t.

So quick question to help me get it…

What’s your view on the mass killing taking place in Gaza? Do you think it needs to happen and is necessary to ‘get rid of Hamas’?

Thanks

相对于自然科学领域的停滞，比如在常温超导、随身核能、量子力学方面的长期停滞，社会科学方面的停滞更加致命。

人类的政治体制有一百多年没有任何进步了。三权分立真的是人类社会治理制度的终极形态吗？至于货币制度，人类采用纯信用货币形式已经有七十多年了，现在也走到了这条路的尽头。

怎么解决？哪里是往前走一步的方向？没有方向。自然科学停滞的后果无非是人类被禁锢在地球上。社会科学的停滞，一定会引发大规模的全球动乱，绝不会有例外。