Avatar
Michael Anton Fischer
90048dc83a62bcd7ac64cbbb91175b4dce0fc6a72bae12b610368e40eec208d4
Just an engineer studying technology and money. Moreover, the translator of Argentarius.

For her friends: Tiger

According to passport: Chilli

The latter is more a warning than a name though.

I think she expects the shenanigans Midjourney is about to commit with her image…

And sometimes you get entirely unexpected results. Told it to make me a cat, instead I became Elon Musk’s son

Originally I wanted it to make me a crazy cat lady, but well…

I got gender affirmative surgery preview by Midjourney and I think that’s enough internet for today

Midjourney can create stunning images, but also be quite dumb. The simple request of Bitcoin earrings is to much for it, even when provided with an example picture.

Learn from it. Once you saved enough for the next phone, get a screen protector.

Replying to Beiner

What is the function of that red button down there?

To be honest, I’m surprised about the return. It doesn’t say a lot about what AI thinks, but rather what humans think is beautiful.

In the end humans tagged the images that trained the AI. And my prompt only gave it the argument to maximize beauty.

So this is essentially what the AI learned about humanities sense of beauty.

Asked Midjourney to draw the most beautiful image possible

Higher mountains can appear lower because of a such well documented and easily verifiable phenomena as perspective. Objects appear smaller the further away they are situated. The fact that we can see a mountain as far away as 443km on the original photo suggests that there is no 5km tall obstruction created by the supposed physical horizon.

Your claim is - air layers of different temperature, pressure, humidity bend light around the supposed Earth’s curvature. To provide proper evidence of it, one needs to visually showcase it and include measurements of air layers through which the light passes. All the documents you sent me objectively lack the needed air layers measurements. That is not debatable. It is you yourself who has a strongly held belief and disregards the fact that there seems to be no real world evidence proving your belief correct.

In my book, any theory that cannot be proven to exist in the real world is just a wet dream of whoever came up with it. People are free to believe in fairies, unicorns and whatever they wish, but I will not consider them to have anything in common with real life unless I see properly documented evidence.

Thank you for the link and your continued desire to help me look into things, I truly appreciate it. However, this link as well provides exclusively theoretical suppositions and completely lacks all the relevant air layers measurements needed to prove refraction can visually bring objects up in the air to the tunes of many kilometres.

Well, this is a point where we can start.

Your claim is that perspective is the explanation.

Which can easily be falsified, by your own picture.

Perspective in a straight makes everything appear smaller the further it is away. The photo does show something very different.

The photo provides evidence that is in line with the current theory, but contradicts your hypothesis.

What’s your argument for it? My browser is an essential everything app already?

Where would the internet be, if you needed to install a different browser for every website?

Nostr is the everything protocol, so why not build everything apps with it?