1st hour of 9/11 coverage: Dan Rather reports on a car bomb exploding at the State Department, says "something has hit the pentagon" and mentions false reports of towers collapsing.
He cites the 1993 WTC bombings as a series of attacks. Refers to recent coordinated attacks "A well orchestrated orgy of terrorism."
https://blossom.primal.net/b48a2b09eb3e3494b80e0616bfb8dda4a62e79bdaec0564bafcf27fbe8846f30.mp4
⚡️🇺🇸 NEW - Dave Chappelle says that if he ever says “I stand with Israel,” it’s a code for “they got him,” and people should stop listening to anything he says after that.
He says his greatest fear is being co-opted, as he doesn’t want the same thing to happen to him that happened to Charlie Kirk.
https://blossom.primal.net/59e2ecf92db762dd49d662e4f6bbea20a3fcc9ce651cab528ba9deccc4ebd991.mp4
It makes the Zionist very uncomfortable to ask about it
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2013/09/03/havaara-agreement-1933/
#History #HavaraAgreement #NaziGermany #Palestine #Colonialism
It makes the Zionist very uncomfortable to ask about it
https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2013/09/03/havaara-agreement-1933/
#History #HavaraAgreement #NaziGermany #Palestine #Colonialism
⚡️🇺🇸 WATCH - Brown University student Alex Shieh previously EVISCERATED the school's administrators for having a $46 million deficit, despite surging costs for students.
They pay $90K+ PER YEAR.
Alex Shieh: "What about the kids who weren't born on third base?! [...] Brown is on track to run a $46 million DEFICIT this year. WHERE is all the money going?"
"I'll tell you where it's going. It's going into an empire of administrative bloat and bureaucracy! Brown employs 3,805 full time non-instructional staff for just 7,229 undergrads. That's one administrator for every two students."
"This isn't education. This is bloat paid for on the backs of students and families who are mortgaging their futures for a shot at a better life!"
https://blossom.primal.net/313850d847ddff413e8f0fa7d9fab621ee0a68199be81de230b091ab872d9e22.mp4
"With a vote by its governing body to accept an advisory committee recommendation, Brown will not divest from 10 companies described in a student-led proposal as facilitating “the Israeli occupation of Palestinian Territory.”
"Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country." - Urban Moving Systems "Dancing Israelis" FBI report.
⚡️🇺🇸 NEW - Tucker Carlson tells the AmericaFest audience that accepting money from AIPAC is an America-last policy and should not be labeled as antisemitism.
He adds that in the last few months of his life, Charlie Kirk told him he was being falsely attacked for being antisemitic when speaking out against AIPAC.
https://blossom.primal.net/7857531ca5dba7998b7dcac387a2a067c21f8422685dfd9ca4633832289fa3d9.mp4
⚡️🇺🇸🇮🇱 NEW - TPUSA AmFest audience cheered as a young man attendee asked Ben Shapiro about Israel’s 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. Shapiro dismissed it as irrelevant because it happened decades ago and asked the attendee why he was raising it now.
https://blossom.primal.net/38deeb5dcad8faa7e5b1a22a57d749e49e951a500e5822fbf404aa8acb8fd5b7.mp4
Naeim Giladi, Iraqi Jewish historian & author, describes how Zionists bombed synagogues in Baghdad to spread terror and cause Jews to leave Iraq. Zionists wanted to use these Iraqi Jews as cheap labor after ethnically cleansing the Palestinians by force and biological warfare.
https://blossom.primal.net/a70a41b0fa7e9cc16e641b1f9557facd8b3ea3af9644edc49759b33e05d0b421.mp4
1947 assassination attempt on US President Harry Truman by the Zionist Stern Gang
1949, Ira R.T. Smith, 'Dear Mr. President ... The Story of Fifty Years in the White House Mail Room', pp. 229-230: "On another occasion, in the summer of 1947 I was summoned back to Washington from my vacation because controversy over important issues, including the Palestine question, had greatly increased the volume of mail to the President. I was rather surprised that the volume should be more than could be handled routinely by the office but when I got back I found that not all the difficulty was due to volume. Some of the letters received had obviously been intended to kill. There had been a flurry in England in June of that summer because eight or more government officials and political personages had received terrorist letters in which explosives were cleverly concealed. Among those who got such letters were Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin, Colonial Secretary Arthur Creech Jones, President of the Board of Trade Sir Stafford Cripps, and former Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden. Cripps's secretary noticed that the letter he received was hot (police said later it was apparently about ready to explode) and he stuck it in water. Eden carried his letter unopened in his briefcase for twenty-four hours before a secretary, tipped off by police, found it. There were two envelopes, the outer one about eight by six inches and cream-colored. The inner envelope was marked "Private and Confidential," presumably in an effort to see that it was opened by the man to whom it was addressed. Inside the second envelope was powdered gelignite, a pencil battery, and a detonator arranged to explode when the envelope was opened. Police exploded one experimentally and said that it was powerful enough to kill a man. The so-called Stern gang of Palestine terrorists later claimed responsibility for having sent the letters from its "branch in Europe." The letters were postmarked from Italy. The same kind of terrorist letters had been found in the White House mail, and as a result the staff had been handling all letters with great care, thus slowing up the routine. So far as I know none of those received in this country resulted in an explosion, which may have been due to the excellent system introduced for handling the White House mail during the war."
1956, Memoirs of Harry S. Truman, 'Vol. 2: Years of Hope', pp. 150-151: "My efforts to persuade the British to relax immigration restrictions in Palestine might have fallen on more receptive ears if it had not been for the increasing acts of terrorism that were being committed in Palestine. There were armed groups of extremists who were guilty of numerous outrages. On June 16 eight bridges were blown up near the Trans-Jordan border, and two other explosions were set off in Haifa. The following day there was a pitched battle between Jews and British troops in Haifa, other explosions had started a fire and caused great damage in the rail yards there. British officers were kidnapped. Others were shot at from passing automobiles. Explosions took place in ever-increasing numbers, and the British uncovered a plot by one extremist group to kidnap the British commander in chief in Palestine."
1972, Margaret Truman, 'Harry S. Truman', pp. 533-534 (Paperback edition): "In the summer of 1947, the so-called Stern Gang of Palestine terrorists tried to assassinate Dad by mail. A number of cream-colored envelopes about eight by six inches, arrived in the White House, addressed to the President and various members of the staff. Inside them was a smaller envelope marked "Private and Confidential." Inside that second envelope was powdered gelignite, a pencil battery and a detonator rigged to explode the gelignite when the envelope was opened. Fortunately, the White House mail room was alert to the possibility that such letters might arrive. The previous June at least eight were sent to British government officials, including Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden. The British police exploded one of these experimentally and said it could kill, or at the very least maim, anyone unlucky enough to open it. The mail room turned the letters over to the Secret Service and they were defused by their bomb experts. The Secret Service still screens all our mail."
December 1, 1972, Associated Press, 'Jews Sent President Truman Letter Bombs, book tells'.
CIA's Robert Crowley (allegedly): "You knew their Stern gang tried to kill Truman once? Harry may have gotten their ball rolling but he stopped shipments of explosives over there to stop the wave of bombings and so on. So they decided to kill him. As I remember, they sent anthrax to Harry in a letter [note: the explosive gelignite actually] but someone else got it. Kept very quiet. The secret service tracked the doers to Montreal and turned it over to us. We found five of them living in a safe house and nailed all of them. Ironically, they got rid of the bodies by dumping them into a local hog farm where the pigs ate them. ... The other one has escaped to Cuba so we got Batista's people to ice him."
In the original Microsoft Wingdings font typing "NYC" would result in a skull-crossbones, star of David and a thumbs up. It was later changed over accusations of antisemitism.
https://blossom.primal.net/8051dc583be026340117985a4172dc0620163f01e6d3b2d72968d6823c098756.mp4
WTC 2nd tower collapsing
https://blossom.primal.net/f60d0fe3b0d7026137fae44fbf989eb50273206aaca9228bb59cd73eb493a055.mp4
VI: The Specter of Nuclear Terrorism
Benjamin Netanyahu
1995
Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists
Chapter - VI - Page 121
The Specter of Nuclear Terrorism
Yet there is one other potential development that could overshadow all this. The expansion of militant Islam, its growing power to intimidate the West and to cause it grievous damage, would be immeasurably increased if the Islamic Republic of Iran or the Sunni militant movement succeeded in acquiring nonconventional weapons chemical, biological, or even nuclear. The best estimates at this time place Iran between three and five years away from possessing the prerequisites required for the independent production of nuclear weapons. After this time, the Iranian Islamic republic will have the ability to construct atomic weapons without the importation of materials or technology from abroad.
Iran has two nuclear reactor sites. The first, at Busheir, was supplied by West Germany when Iran was still ruled by the Shah. Work at the Busheir plant was stopped in 1979 with the seizure of the government by the Ayatollah Khomeini. At this point, construction of the plant was roughly 85 percent complete, and the special electrical work necessary for such installations was approximately 65 percent complete. The reactor at Busheir was bombed by Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war (which of course did not stop Saddam from condemning the Israeli attack on his nuclear reactor at Osiraq). After the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1992, Iran signed an agreement with post-Soviet Russia for the revitalization of the site. The agreement called for the Russians to supply Iran with two 440-megawatt reactors. In early 1995 it was agreed that two other reactors which had been slated for construction in northern Iran were also to be moved to Busheir. The first phase of construction and electrical work will be completed within three to four years. A second project is under way in northern Iran at Darku- bin. In the days of the Shah, Iran had signed a contract with France to provide two reactors at this site, and this work, too, was halted by the outbreak of the war with Iraq. In 1993, Iran reached an agreement with China to provide this location with two 300-megawatt reactors, a deal which the United States attempted to block without success. In addition, Iran has its own uranium mine and processing plant at Sighand, which will be operational within three to five years. Finally, Iran has two institutes conducting nuclear research; the principal one at Isfahan is developing techniques for uranium enrichment under the guise of a civilian research project. This means that, within a short time, Iran will have the raw materials, the plants, and the technical know-how to produce its own bombs. It would then be a matter of five to seven years at most before Iran is able to assemble such weapons.
There is no way of knowing whether Iran can be deterred from using its nuclear arsenal, as the Soviet Union was for more than four decades, or whether it would actually be willing to one day plunge the world into the abyss. But whether or not the Iranian regime is in fact willing to use such a device, it is critical to recognize the effect that an "Islamic bomb" in the hands of Iran would immediately have on the conventional balance of power in the Middle East—for it would be a "new Middle East" indeed. The acquisition of nuclear weapons by the Islamic republic would dramatically realign the political forces of the Middle East toward heightened radicalism. It would be seen as the greatest of anti-Western weapons, even more powerful than the oil weapon at its height, and a providential sign that Allah had not abandoned his faithful. States such as Algeria, which are in any case tottering on the brink of Islamic revolution, would suddenly find themselves facing a dramatically more powerful domestic threat from their Muslim fanatics. And the peace treaties which Israel has signed may be placed under intolerable pressure under the withering radiation of a nuclear-armed militant Islam. One need only recall how King Hussein—whose commitment to peace with Israel has been demonstrated since 1970—found himself having to make common cause with Saddam Hussein in 1991, when Saddam was at the height of his prestige in the days following Iraq's incursion into Kuwait. Power has its own logic, and such a quantum leap in the power of Islamic radicalism would attract to it millions of new adherents around the world, and much new political sup- port—both that produced by adulation and that produced by fear—throughout the Middle East and far beyond it.
How could Iran use such nuclear weapons? It might, of course, threaten the West or any of its neighbors out- right, just as Saddam Hussein would undoubtedly have done had his nuclear programs been completed by the time of his invasion of Kuwait. If Saddam had possessed atomic bombs, the Gulf War probably would never have taken place. He could have made it clear that he was prepared to strike at the Allied forces with nuclear weapons; or that he would destroy a neighboring capital like Riyadh; or that he would destroy the oil-loading facilities of the Persian Gulf; or that he would bomb the Straits of Hormuz, wreaking a catastrophe that would have closed down the sea lanes to much of the world's oil just as he had no compunction about pouring billions of barrels of oil into the Gulf as a warning to the Allies, in the process inventing a new form of ecological terrorism.
A nuclear-armed Iran such as we may have to face in the coming years will have all these options open in a future confrontation with the West, and others as well. It could avoid a direct threat against the United States and the West with its attendant consequences of horrible retribution. It could instead resort to indirect intimidation of nuclear holocaust, dissociating itself from the threat by using any one of a number of shadowy Islamic terrorist groups that it controls. Such a group could emerge anywhere in the sea of militant Islamic puddles that now cover the entire West. The group could issue a veiled ultimatum that unless demands emanating from Iran were met, it would exact a horrible price. Further, Iran might be tempted to actually use nuclear weapons against Israel or a neighboring Arab state, and then avoid the consequences of Western reaction by threatening to activate its pre-armed militants in the West. Such groups nullify in large measure the need to have air power or intercontinental missiles as delivery systems for an Islamic nuclear payload. They will be the delivery system. In the worst of such scenarios, the consequences could be not a car bomb but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center.
This may sound incredible or beyond the realm of possibility. Unfortunately, it is not. Anyone familiar with the warped fanaticism and increasing technical proficiency of Islamic militants cannot rule it out as a growing danger. Today's terrorist groups can already deploy chemical weapons of the most lethal variety known to man. Equipped by a runaway terrorist regime, they could be given other, even more deadly, nonconventional weapons.
One does not have to be an expert in international terrorism to sense that this rising tide of Islamic terrorism is qualitatively different from the terrorism which the West has had to face up until now. For it derives from a highly irrational cultural source, militant Islam, which differs profoundly from that other anti-Western doctrinaire militancy, Communism. Some similarities between the two movements are striking. Both have sought world dominion in the service of an all-encompassing ideology. Both have had millions of adherents spread around the globe ready to do their bidding. Both have been centered in a home country, which organized the dissemination of the creed worldwide. Yet the similarities end there. For while the Communists pursued an irrational doc- trine, they nonetheless pursued it rationally. Neither Stalin nor Brezhnev ever seriously considered putting ideology above existence. This is why the Communists eventually accepted the necessity of co-existence. When it came to deciding between blowing themselves up in a nuclear exchange and compromising on their ideology, they could be counted on to compromise on their ideology every time.
The trouble with militant Islam is that it appears to be an irrational goal being pursued irrationally. And this irrationality expresses itself in the ease with which the militant Muslims reverse the order of priorities, putting ideological zeal before life itself. The rapidly increasing use of suicide bombings by Islamic terrorists of the Hizballah and Hamas suggests that at least some of the people involved have no qualms about blowing themselves up in the service of their ideology (a phenomenon Americans will remember from the Japanese kamikazes of World War II). This pathology—I can use no other term—manifests itself in the glee with which mothers offer their sons for the greater glory of the faith, or in the ritualistic drinking from fountains of blood by Iranian soldiers during the Iran-Iraq war. Today one must realistically face the possibility that in the not too distant future militant Middle Eastern states will possess nuclear weapons.
That the world is standing in front of an abyss is barely understood by most political leaders today. For the irrational strain that runs through Islamic fundamentalism and its obsessive hatred of the West are usually dis- counted in assessing its potential threat. But the leaders of the West must take into account that this irrationality might prompt the leaders of Iran to toy with the idea of terrorist blackmail on an unimaginable scale. Once Iran has nuclear weapons, there is nothing to say that it will not move to greater adventurism and irrationality rather than greater responsibility. It is not inconceivable that such a regime, in the throes of an international conflict or internal political convulsion, could threaten the United States, or Britain, or France with nonconventional weapons. If this happens, international terrorism could undergo an incredible transformation in which not individual citizens or buildings are threatened or demolished but entire cities are held hostage.
The only way to understand the failure of understanding in this regard is to look back at another hate-filled ideology that began as another local manifestation and within a few years became a global force. Like Islamic fundamentalism, Nazism sixty years ago was directed first against the Jews and other local minorities. But soon it was evident that its creed of hate swept like wildfire throughout all Europe and the world. The Western nations woke up almost too late to its incendiary nature, and to the danger it posed to civilization. But consider what would have happened had Hitler succeeded in his own quest for a nuclear capability. When his scientists invented the V-2 rocket, he had no qualms whatsoever about raining them down in deadly payloads on down- town London. We can only shudder at the consequences for the world if Hitler's mad antipathies had been wedded to nuclear weapons. Our civilization and our culture would have come to an end. Today, for the second time in modern times, we are faced with the possibility that an irrational movement might come into possession of weapons of mass annihilation. This is the greatest terror imaginable, because the greatest danger of nuclear weapons is in the lack of susceptibility of their deployers to sober calculations of cost and benefit. If Iran, or its militant proxies in the Middle East or Europe or the United States, has atomic bombs, we will be faced with a possibility of terrorism and blackmail that would make Oklahoma City look like a children's game. This is the great peril, and it has not been addressed. The democracies have wasted much time. They are approaching the twelfth hour. They can wait no longer.
Inscription
105,926,065
Evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11 tragedy inscribed into the Bitcoin timechain.
45 publications
note17d40nn2pelv7pvhzemnxdlqft4mn0jf4qhsj0a2f9p2d8ujxdv5sxfxjsg
2001-09-11 09:09:44 Skytel [007528823] B ALPHA Y! ||$499 deals on iPAQ Pocket PC Israeli Tanks Encircle West Bank City Reuters 3 #911txts
“You weren’t misled by accident. You were given a version of truth so rehearsed, so repeated, that even doubt started to sound like denial.” - Julian Assange.
Happy birthday to Julian, a free man, fighter and inspiration.
Daniel Lewin "The Israeli hero who almost stopped 9/11"
https://blossom.primal.net/33a1c8d6f0c8056da92c9a2dbf5766aa61e98ba3eee932936b585cfbb9243075.mp4 #september11 #freepalestine #gaza #israel #mossad
WTC7 - Larry Silverstein says 'PULL IT'
BBC reports 911, WTC 7 Collapse before it happens