Avatar
knutsvanholm
92cbe5861cfc5213dd89f0a6f6084486f85e6f03cfeb70a13f455938116433b8
Mind-dynamite monger

"Owning" a "rare satoshi" is a bit like calling a prostitute "your wife."

Since value is subjective it cannot be stored.

What you've got is a Medium of Exchange over time and space. If you cannot exchange it with your future self (over time) it becomes useless as a Medium of Exchange over space too.

This is fake news.

Vitalik is not South Korean, not a professor, and doesn't look like that at all.

🚨ANNOUNCEMENT!🚨

On #BitcoinInfinityDay 2024, my new book #BITCOIN: THE INVERSE OF CLOWN WORLD will be released!

The book is co-written with nostr:npub1fk8h6g8zhftw8c7pga2zjd84p2z949up5lc3qdchm9v4m0q7mwws7jcwld from the nostr:npub1h727rfzm6hk9egx5yr602hxszezu0pyl2l7azwuvttlvf67uepyq559jmf and we're making an ENTIRE BOOK VIDEO SERIES with Ioni Appelberg and nostr:npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev

∞/21M = 1/🤡

https://youtu.be/cbnL1yOv1VU?si=atIDvmJ0rL8YXjkI

It's more important for the cost of running a #Bitcoin node to stay low than for the cost of on-chain transactions to stay low.

Freedom of Speech is the right given to you by your gracious masters to semi-openly complain when they take your stuff against your will.

Freedom of Speech is the right given to you by your gracious masters to semi-openly complain when they take your stuff against your will.

The idea of paying money for goods is not new

The idea of sending money is not new

The idea of using meaningless ledger entries as money is not new

The idea of generating meaningless ledger entries via laborious mathematical procedures is new

But to presume that the (machine) labor involved gives the ledger entries value requires one to forget the most basic lessons of economics

I think it is and will be seen as a mark of shame on many otherwise-brilliant Austrian school economists to have fallen for this nonsense

The classical & Marxists notion of value as being based on labor creates unresolvable paradoxes, such as why trade occurs at all. With a single objective scale of value, a trade is either greater for lesser (in which case why would the one with the greater value agree to give it up for lesser?) or equal for equal (in which case why does anyone bother?)

So either the labor theory of value is wrong (even when the labor is machine labor or electricity or whatever) or all of human trade is pointless.

Instead, value is subjective, which does not mean arbitrary and made up. Rather, the value of a good is the highest use to which it may be put.

But Bitcoin has no use to which it may ultimately be put, because it does not exist. There are no Bitcoins. You have (in essence) a ledger entry saying how many Bitcoins Satoshi owes you for running some calculations for him, but he will never pay up and can never pay up because the units in which he is meant to pay you are made up nothings. You might as well have a ledger entry saying you own 8 jabberwockies.

Value is indeed subjective. Which is why your argument contradicts itself. Whether or not you find the idea of Bitcoin useful is up to you. The satoshis does not exist, except in your head. They're literally a secret you keep. How much you are willing to give up that secret for, is up to you. It is also up to you what you're willing to pay for someone else's secret.

Don't find Bitcoin valuable? Then don't use it.

There is no second breakfast.

The bills they print are claims on your stuff.

∫MoE dt -> ∫MoE ds

Few

There is no second use case!

Replying to Avatar Gigi

GM

Kind of looks like you 😉

Ask not what your Bitcoin can do for you – ask what you can do for your Bitcoin

You cannot own #Bitcoin.

What you CAN do is rely on the fact that the risk of someone else knowing the same Private Key as you is so infinitesimally small that it makes sense to use satoshis as a communications tool for expressing value.

You cannot "own" #Bitcoin in the traditional sense of owning stuff.

No matter what governments, courts, chain-anal people, or anyone else tells you, there is no way of proving that someone DOESN'T know a string of information such as a private key.

From this perspective, satoshis aren't ever transferred but rather reorganized on the timechain for communication purposes.

The twelve magic words do not belong to anyone. They're just twelve words.

What Bitcoin makes so blatantly obvious is that money was never anything but information.

A ban on "self-hosted wallets" is as absurd as a ban on using your brain.

Such a ban would have severe consequences.

It would deny you the right to keep a secret while granting the government the right to claim that you do, making everyone a criminal.

YOU would have to prove that you DON'T know something, which is impossible.

You would be guilty until proven innocent, which cannot be proven.

Any law trying to stop or restrict Bitcoin usage is nothing less than a crime against humanity.

IMHO, the Bitcoin community should do everything in its power to prevent such laws. Your ability to use a communications network shouldn't depend on where you were born.

Do your part and educate as many people as you can as often as possible.

Speech is never free but always costly. It's high time to separate speech and state!

From FFS ep. 100 👀