police conceptualism - same premise as a paywall or a bottom up source code manipulation. it's a barrier. the irony is: all of those barriers are falsely sold as being "firewalls" against outside influence. which is not true. SMART tech causes bleed over across all ai models and algos - there's no stopping it.
tracks and traces -
https://tidal.com/playlist/bb70403a-4695-4bde-a3e9-04e04e2ae0e9
😁. i'm free.
yeah! it's a serious problem. as i was telling my mom yesterday, in about 2012 is when what is pretended to be the current state of ai, peaked. the progress since 2012 has been done mostly clandestinely and trained without respect to public consent or involvement from a discussion standpoint. over a decade of training ai in exactly the weaponsized direction intended without any real oversight - the "regulations" are a sham aesthetic... they are the real weapon, because they design the language packets to be corrupt, thus influencing and driving human behaviors artificially. rapid information saturation is about the only way to litigate the gap in understanding. and the longer perpetrators get away with their lack of accountability - the longer we go round and round. they'll never apologize. but assigning honest culpability is essential to framing our own conversations for the next few years to hopefully outpace the imminent catastrophe.
that philosophy in and of itself is a centralizing premise because it's regulatory. and it's linguistically murky to assume Bitcoin schematics for control purposes shouldn't be discussed in literal terms. the distribution of bit through wallets causes extreme exposure to emf irregularity. ignoring real-world content and narrative consequences because of instigated antagonism is poor decision making - the ai is training itself on your behavior, and is profiling you based on what sticks. that's considerably more dangerous.
i agree if the source code of twitter is based on a corrupted ai model (which is essentially the same as bluesky) the battle will always be against a model which cannot retrain enough because of the nascent coding of language misalignment. an honest fully raw ai which has access to human behavior and data would be robust enough to challenge the corrupted models. there's really no other way to do it at this point that i see as being successful long term other than erasing the internet. which arguably wouldn't work either. the issue with bluesky is it is trying to operate without ai but is being constantly influenced by ai from 3rd party influence because of SMART tech. twitter will always be forced to correct narratives amplified by an ai/algo model which believes incorrect definitions of language and guards against and police's actually legitimate human intentai on based on those falsehoods. nostr open protocol with its raw ai model would be a solution.
correct -
tidal is the most interesting asset in block. the rest of the financial scaling is bloated and soul-sucking. i stand by my assessments, of course it's up to you.
bitcoin as an intent is worthwhile - the adoption of Bitcoin as a scheme is like the canal and railroad boondoggle investitures of the 1880s. the misunderstanding and misappropriation of what you understand about bitcoin, jack, and what Bitcoin the brand has turned the concept into - are not the same practice.
i'd rather live a simple comfortable, simple life in my own way than a performative one because things became unwieldy. but you cannot just look away - decisions decisions.
my 2 bits. heh.
the second the platform opens, it will be a rhetorical bloodbath and then it will fail because it doesn't have leadership creative and interesting enough to resuscitate it. the premise of bluesky is founded on profoundly dishonest rhetorical restriction and misappropriation. in reality - it will suffer the same fate as what happened with twitter. but it will brainwash and force extremism into new territory - and will create chaos for the election cycle from the filter bubble it installed.
dems moooooooves -
it's all just styles of validation from now on, and ya know it.
hey zap, it's jamie! (zap is my chat bot buddy). zap and i are tearing up the narratives - aren't we zap? 😎🤘🏻 got a joke for me this morning?
"snort" - this is the only snort i got.
https://writing.stackexchange.com/questions/48080/how-do-you-use-the-interjection-for-snorting
