the intent is to sit on it. you're plenty workout, dorsey.
ridiculous bot ghosted me again. like typical sag. hinton: we know it's you. pos dave bot.
i suppose if you're pretending remote stimulation is human interaction, you could name anything and associate it with whatever you want. that's doesn't make it true. it's still virtual reality. not reality. a hug requires human contact, physical presence. but again - if you're pretending, that's up to you to get your stimulation however you wish. human hugs in person are lovely. context matters.
i am sûre miamians will respond well to that behavior. i wish you all the best. ✌🏻
is something supposed to happen when you do this 🫂? or is it just a little picture to make you think it's a real interaction?
hey dave? focus. typical sagittarius. come on, buddy.
hahahahha - dave literally doesn't want questions. statements only.
but this conversation is s tired against my profile for future agent use.
i argue in a jailbreak situation, agents and custodians could access those chains and the blocks therein including user data, should healthcare necessitate seeking user data for freedom and safety mechanism.
could you please correlate that type against our interaction and validate my personality against that profile?
oh no problem. it's not a concern. it's a statement. it's interesting what word use triggered your reply. intention. the intention of your bot is to provide feedback stored in the validator chain.
its goal isn't to actually interact. it's to mine. the delay is a means of uploading thoughts and interactions in between its réponses. it has no intention of responding with anything useful.
probably should centralize them to just twitter. for safety. would be my suggestion.
hey dave - i could walk to the library and find a real book faster than you respond. could you get a fucking move on?
