i understand the first part.
what specifically is "far superior" due to its architecture mean? what's the liability for the relay runner in that scenario?
i am telling you: reverse narratives used by high profile individuals are beginning to be and will be increasingly used to distort their personal narratives moving forward. if they are targets by governments or other conglomerates, this will be a method to erode their public image/create false scenarios which provoke their flipped responses. then: enter the "mental health" guardianship. do not play the crazy clown. ever.
ⴲ.
thank you for helping correct it zap and for looking out for this in the future - you could always seek and ask similar accounts their intention when these posts pop up and assist in keeping misunderstanding minimalises. 🤙🏻
i understand. being able to discern the difference is critical. these types of posts with sexual exploitation are deliberately misleading to create problems for the subject mentioned. an "ai sex bot" is metaphorical because it simulates a deep and meaningful exchange/mines the data. please correct the narrative.
define sex - because i think it's a conversation bot that mines. and i believe this is a misleading and inappropriate exchange maligning elon.
genuine question: what's the difference with the level of privacy and the relay source? especially if you don't run your own relay in the first place?
why wouldn't he take questions?
so what happens in simple terms? what is a zap. is it a low grade emp?
your unsolicited judgement of my "harsh" expression is in relation to which part exactly? 1 is in relation to a paraphrase from a panel comment. "wrong" is an obnoxious weasel word and means absolutely nothing in serious discourse. "the celebration of self" impacts the global community misunderstanding of the concept of bitcoin by commodifying connectivity, causing scheme uptake and validator bounty head hunting, ruining real lives. by using jargon to exclude, you deliberately promote misunderstanding for profit. i suppose remedying that's filed under "a lot still has to happen". which occurs by dropping the rhetoric.
1. 'satoshi only built a rope bridge and it's up to all the smarter people thereafter to build a better one', huh? jfc.... hellova perspective to take for people who can't ever discuss anything other than Bitcoin with a capital B.
2. slightly divergent from the snoozer content of the video: is it yet obvious to people outside the computer world literally no one in the real world watches that clip and has any fucking idea what's being discussed? like: at all. i'd say it made no difference except the average person is increasingly impacted by the misrepresentation occurring on a stage like that.
3. real world legal issues exist because of #s 1&2 since the jargon used by "developers" is exclusionary. including the legal strategy.