some people don't even realize how pervasive their distorted language is. there are those who subtly fold in the layers and some just completely disregard reality in favor of deep labels and corrupted plot lines. on purpose.
i had an email correspondant once who did this with random stories and obscure "family members" i would get tagged with, maligned freely against. never changed, even after 2 decades of silence. the only way you know is to invest the time to learn -
our parents do this too. especially when they're cornered -
like many things at the moment, valuations are weaponised. there's little use in one company saying anything about another without knowing the deep ties to why they have evaluated it thusly. twitter as an entity and twitter as a company are not the same value - nor will they get a fair estimation on the open market because it's inconvenient to the status quo. the most effective means of insulation twitter could do would be to shed all unnecessary investment and have full self-custody of the company. shrinking before expanding would allow this to be possible, to buy out those who see it as a flop investment. twitter might now always appear to be the giant the other socials are - that's it's strength. allowing the market to judge unfairly works in the favor of twitter in the end of the opportunity is seized and all investors are bought out. that should be the goal.