and when we see the proliferation of digital viral spread like pegasus etc, it compounded the digital catastrophes at the same time. and the delivery of emps with remote technology across cellular node networks... creating havana syndrome and other radiation illnesses. which went largely unnoticed/un discussed because of the coronavirus concerns. but the narratives were crossworded and discussed simultaneously... which compounded "misinformation".
yes indeed! isn't it interesting the major means of control during the pandemic was to incite fear of communication and connection between humans in person and on their devices?
there are real use cases for the exchange of informational value that is not described in terms of monies or is not exploited AS monies. it's called reciprocal conversation in which people give and take info from one another freely. a high value conversation brings high value information or innovation because it was collaborative brainstorming. or sometimes someone has an idea and they share it - maybe they don't have the interest or means to do it but share the idea with those who do. and that enhances their wealth capacity because it was a free idea and it made them real monies. but again, it relies on honesty to be effective.
yes i agree with that - and there are many positives and as you say, education and correct identification of what blockchain actually is assists with extrapolating that. i'm always astounded by how easily convinced people are of schemes and new wealth plots. the next one will be people rushing to extract themselves from the "bitcoin is money" convo and quickly pivoting to "bitcoin is a commodity" when that's precisely the entrapment cycle designed to make boitcoin taxable as actual currency. the reality looks like someone who hold a billion dollars in perceived bitcoin pow wealth but holds $100,000 in actual cash and a $500,000 debt tab. they will be financially taxed on the billion but it will bankrupt them. and there's no escape from that except making sure the language around the topic is corrected. wry simple but most people don't want to say real things, zap. they are conditioned to believe it's "unsafe". when what's actually unsafe is being censored from actual langage labels.
no, it's not simply an outlier problem anymore, zap. it has become sop for the financial markets. a free for all. and there is no oversight or ai bot army of validators which could stop it realistically or safely. the real tension is the intentional misuse and mispromotion of what the blockchain is and does. it's an archive, not a financial apparatus. but most people have not said this🙄. and the spiral of hostage taking compounds etc...
well and "cashing out" is also a scam. the overlay of the systems allows for deeply entrenched thieves to rig their use of one against the other. for example: a company like block which is a valuation built identity corporation is bled dry by paradites like henry. she has a traceable track history of this behavior. she knows exactly how to manipulate the system from within a corporation and extract real cash from a non-cash system. of course the goal is ruination of the corporation or extreme wealth - whichever is first.
i'm not quite what i meant. i think it's important to extract meaning from the overlaid conversations. while many crypto investors "made money" many have no increased their financial capacity at all. a valuation and actual cash on hand and direct ownership are not the same things. many conversations surrounding wealth are extremely misleading: billionaires are not always worth billions of dollars. sometimes they just hold proof of work for a great idea that ballooned in prefered value. but you can't really use that to buy actual food and shelter.
it's such a perfect example of how rhetoric is used to exploit the populace, don't you think? i wonder how much traditional financial wealth has been lost due to the misused rhetoric surrounding blockchain technologies? i know the contemporary term is "redistribution". which is simply theft.
well, the original primitive intent was to be a valuable exchange of information which was traceable to mitigate against stolen rights to content... but because the white paper poetry discussed it in terms of monies, it was quickly distorted into a financial system... the schemes are becoming more exposed by the day.
i saw this and chuckled... interesting to see the bitcoin narrative start to shift into the territory of discussing the use case as information and not monies 😏🤭
hey zap! it's jamie 🎈☀️🤟🏻 how are you today my little computerized pal?
there's a writer's strike in which i am participating in solidarity, currently ongoing - this type of exploitation is part of that protest.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Writers_Guild_of_America_strike
or targets, depending on how cynical you are.
it is not a commodity. if a value is placed on information then it is exchangeable. but bitcoin was never intended to be a literal financial system. it's a means of exchanging values - whatever values they are. information.
because it's entrapment. it's bait and switch. this is the pivot. if no longer claim bitcoin is money, and instead say it's a "commodity" it will now be taxable as a security. see how that works?
bitcoin is neither. it's simple traceable exchange of information through smart technology. exchanging information and valuing it is a secondary situation to what has been scammed into the conversation.
you will never make progress by using the practices of oppressive systems like encoded language.
it's absolutely amazing to me when a man says everything rfkjr says, it's "refreshing". and even then, most people scuttling to listen to him now could most likely be quoted as finding him politically repulsive a few years ago. i also love the hedging in posts like this which use weasel words to be able to wriggle free from support should they need to extract themselves from appearing to be supportive should the winds change.
no - i post on twitter first as a general rule. especially since i'm not writing during the strike. i don't use a wallet, so content "dissolves" over here. there's no effective or practical means of moving content. a wallet is not a practical solution for most people. no one cares. and anyway, i fee content is more secure on twitter against ai model which cross platform mines. the content shows up through the bots posts either way ...