我听不太懂🥲

你对笛卡尔的理解是对的，他和安瑟尔谟基本是一个逻辑。

当然我好像没说清楚，我是让大家挑战反驳下👻

你觉得笛卡尔说得对吗？

曾经有哲人说，从一出生开始，人的心灵就戴着一副无法摘下的眼镜。这是一副心灵独属的内在的眼镜，人不可以摘下它，而且每个人心灵的眼镜各不相同，会随着时间和阅历而不断改变。透过这副眼镜，人看到的事物会有所改变或扭曲，不同的人看到的事物各不相同。

区别于这种内在的眼镜，还有很多种外在的眼镜，比如一本书，一部电影，读一本书或者看一部电影就相当于暂时戴上一副外在的眼镜。当这种外在的眼镜戴得时间长了次数多了，内在的心灵的眼镜也会受到影响而随之发生改变。

人与人的不同本质上在于所戴“眼镜”的不同。

每次挤完早高峰地铁我就在想，北京这地方真的适合人类生存吗…

You made good points, but I think being human is seeing the reactions of your peers directly in their faces as you say something. Likes are an approximation of that, but I don't know if it gets close enough to be worth all the drawbacks.

But to be honest the nastier part is probably the notifications stuff always calling you to see that some random person you don't even know or value has clicked a button.

Another issue is that a like from someone that only likes things they actually do like should be worth more than a like from these crazies that just keep liking everything they see, but there is no real way to measure this -- while in the real life we can often tell fake likes from real likes.

从这个意义上讲，哲学是不是才是研究世界本源的起点，而物理学次之，数学才是终点，排除了各种干扰后，收敛到一个更接近本源的解。