It's smaller because there are fewer transactions going through it.
Personally I'd try g3 in this position. Giving up the center to the teeth for the opening, but preparing for a fast kingside castle with fianchetto bishop. This also creates a pawn spike against the monster's kingside eye.
What do you think?
#chess #memes
Amethyst controls the user experience in more ways than that. They also have groups, like subreddits, which appear to be chosen by the client since most of them are not available on my relay list. A few other developer choices also affect the content you see.
It's a fine line with not ideal or simple solutions. We need more clients trying new things.
But it was about the spam checker and he told you to delete the spam flagged posts to fix it. Agree shouldn't be done at the client level, but incentive exists to filter spam at the client level so people will prefer your client.
I'm not eating enough eggs. 
Do you mean you'll let White people control your media, finance, academia, healthcare, government, and endlessly gaslight you while we flood Israel with "multiculturalism"?
Keep your jewish blessings to yourself please, rabbi. We're sick of it. We're tired of you.
What are they saying will happen this time? I haven't been paying much attention to that.
Can't have a stack of sats unless you're humble.
I'm of the opinion that he's just the world's greatest hodler, and believes that the world isn't finished changing, and he believes deeply in the ideals of Bitcoin and project that he brought to life. I think his first purchase will be a pizza for like 10 sats. And the pizza gets delivered and there's no one there.
But anyway the effect to this point has been the same as if he'd burned the wallet.
Also it seems difficult to provably burn coins.
You mean like Satoshi did? I dunno, probably the same thing, your Bitcoin just becomes more valuable. Except Saylor would have a bunch of pissed off investors.
I've burned my whole npub like 5 times now. I'm never getting on that premium shit. If Nostr isn't instantly accessible to everyone with little/no setup, it will never catch on.
This all seems pretty exaggerated. It just isn't that hard to get privacy out of Bitcoin. If everyone agrees on the simplest and scarcest and first asset, it really is reasonable that they wouldn't simultaneously give that up in favor of a value system that is infinite but more private by default. They may not even agree that it's a worthwhile tradeoff, since scarcity has always been the most important feature of money.
That could change in the future, when everyone is paying for their coffee with crypto, and mining Monero on their laptop just for funsies. But we're several years from that point at least. That's a monetary superhighway, while we're still on wagon trails. But this trail is being blazed by scarcity as a primary feature, not privacy. Scarce is the one thing all money has tried to be for thousands of years. That's why gold was money.
No one but the "500/10" will ever be good enough for her. And even he would be a letdown soon enough.
So what's the second best argument?
Maybe just more people are noticing bad jewish behavior.
We had a big talk and we all agreed to wait to dip until after you buy.
It depends. There's a big difference between offering soup to anyone who comes through the door and running a human smuggling operation like HAIS.
The "people" they're replacing these native Europeans with will never be capable of presenting and explaining complex concepts like this. It's not just about attacking the food supply, it's also about creating a new less capable slave race.
It's not just about free speech, it's also about truth. As long as there is censorship, important truth can, and will, be hidden from the masses.
Well I'm going to make a Bitcoin business and I'll also take Monero. Only those two, or cash. And if I ever get a choice to pay with either Bitcoin or Monero, I'll pay with Monero if all else is equal. Not only to support you guys and your principled stance, but because I'd prefer to hold the Bitcoin.