The proxies are so noisy they must be smoothed to the extent they can't show variation on the relevant scale.
We're saying things like:
- proving causality in a chaotic/complex system like climate is impossible and meaningless
- science has clearly been shut down, there is no possibility to challenge the narrative
- the proposed response will clearly fail to do anything other than expand control by ppl who are literally flying round in private jets while telling the sheep they can't drive a car or eat meat
Um and also, Incredible i have ti say it but:
- humans are not going extinct from this 😂😂😂
Ok you'll know this: what's the normal amount of global temperature variation at the scale of centuries?
Spoiler: we don't know because temperature before thermometers must be inferred from proxies which are so smoothed they cannot resolve to centuries.
So we have no way to say any warming we now observe isn't natural variation.
Even if it was all true (it's obviously not, jfc) the best mitigations all involve adaptation. Basically prioritising economic growth because wealth is the number 1 protection from climate "threats".
But nobody pushing the "climate crisis" has any interest in that - or even in solutions like nuclear energy.
Because none of them actually care about the climate - they just want a way to bully and control people and, consciously or not, usher in global communism.
But at this point if you can't see what's going on there's not much to say.
Even if everyone, including us, agreed bitcoin was going to destroy the world, it would be impossible to do anything to stop it.
Because it is impossible to stop bitcoin.
