Avatar
pseudo~u *likes nostr already*
95c33bfbb96b0f463cb80f6f2e229ded74f36e9694e6b04dec5124e4ef6bde66
Peace, love, freedom. First freedom.. Maddie de Garay was a 12 year old in the trial for Pfizer's covid vaccine. Immediately after her second jab she had a severe reaction that has put her in a wheelchair ever since. Pfizer simply decreed that this was not an effect of the vaccine - even though this was in the trial whose purpose is literally to determine the vaccine's effects. The FDA and CDC would not even speak to Maddy's parents. They tried to convince them Maddy was crazy. There is no possible conclusion except that the vaccines were developed in bad faith, and the authorities - including any doctors who promoted the vaccines - cannot be trusted. Be in no doubt that they will kill your children if it suits them. Never forget, never forgive. https://fullmeasure.news/newest-videos/vaccine-trials
Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

That is what the WEF appears to be at a surface level. Politicians like Starmer have unequivocally stated they serve the interests of the WEF over that of their country. These are people who have aligned with globalists against their own citizens.

https://video.nostr.build/42e0e8c68434aa494b5134816f9815af5139cf7e8957275af2f47bc4b5b4e76e.mp4

I think whenever I have these discussions, it is exactly to what you are saying - the balance between ignorant participation and knowingly acting in a certain manner for other reasons. And I agree with you on that mostly - they are largely just people doing things they genuinely believe in. However, bad actors do exist in these positions, too. Well, technically, I would say those people are above governments are not usually in the public light, but some hide out in plain sight. I think both these things are true.

It is the tactic of compartmentalisation. It is how the policies can be distributed in a way that seems very organic, but hardly ever is.

"Politicians like Starmer have unequivocally stated they serve the interests of the WEF over that of their country"

Well what he said was he'd rather be at Davos - not that he serves the WEF. I'd expect his reasoning would be exactly as I said - that its a place to network and plan with global partners in govts and business etc blah, we have global problems that need global solutions blah.

"they are largely just people doing things they genuinely believe in"

For what its worth I don't think these people (the sheep / normies / useful idiots) believe in anything at all. They simply follow the herd with varying degrees of awareness.

I find the following classification useful:

*Sheep* are those who follow the herd because they want an easy life - though they may well know its nonsense and say so.

*Normies* are those who follow the herd because they've convinced themselves they "believe" in the issue at hand. Of course they don't really believe it, it could be anything at all, but they are committed to professing that belief extravagantly. What they really believe is in the importance of following the herd - and in their deserving of high status in it.

But yeah nothing is real for them I think, except the herd. They will literally sacrifice their children in order to follow it.

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

At that level I would say it is typically all organic - the 'useful idiots' I refer too. I guess I am doing a not-so-great job of trying to bring across a nuanced point, because I said, I don't think everyone is in on something.

Most people involved in government are not particularly wise; those people are usually spending their time doing other things in life.

The majority of people still believe there was a pandemic of natural origin to this day, because they don't care to consider anything else. There were obvious precursors to the pandemic and many reasons that it happened, and I don't believe any of them are of natural originals. The going direct BlackRock plan started in the months leading up to it, and the pandemic was the perfect cover-up to print money.

That was just one of many reasons. The other was an opportunity to seize more control over people. You think they are just saying, "There WILL be another pandemic." is just for fun? They are telling us over and over what they plan to do.

Many in government or any position of power became tyrannical, taking things too far like arresting people because they went for a walk. That is just normal useful idiot behaviour. I am in no way suggesting those people are 'in' on something. The vast majority of those people are not involved in any plans. How does one explain those who opposed covid (I think it was 5 of them) all dying under suspicious circumstances? It is something that is easy to dismiss when you don't consider the somewhat obvious explanation for it.

They had plans for pandemics, and instead they followed some completely novel ideas, which coincidentally happened to be the same as those outlined in 'preparedness' exercises but nothing like what they had originally planned for. They threw out all their plans and went with what everyone else was doing. It is a great demonstration for herd mentality - since none of what they did had any evidence backing it. It was all made up. That's how useless these people are, they still can't discern that TODAY. They still can't admit they fucked up, instead most of them double down.

I highly recommend checking this 20 min clip from Mike Benz. It is a breakdown of declassified documents of how governments infiltrate all sorts of movements with careful planning that seem so incredibly unlikely that people just can't comprehend it. These are planned, coordinated efforts that go above what most people are privy to. That is how they get away with it - using the useful idiots as cover, and compartmentalising the rest.

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1825048993136546230

OK thanks will put that clip on my list to watch.

Do you happen to have an easy link about the "5 people who opposed it are dead"?

Here's the debunking.

When a fact checker has to admit the basics of the conspiracy theory correct, and rely on "but correlation isn't causation" then you know somethings up!

https://fullfact.org/health/midazolam-video-matt-hancock/

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

I can see it from that perspective, I have some friends who think the same way. I wouldn't say it's a minority position, but I think both are true to some extent.

At some point, it becomes to difficult to pretend that all of these things are organic, such as all governments agreeing to shut down their countries and enforce the same 'guidelines' unilaterally. The few leaders who didn't, mysteriously died.

The 'coincidences' only ever trend in the direction of the state. To me, its the same type of gaslighting (from state actors) as suggesting autism has solely gone up because of the way it is diagnosed. 'Experts are baffled. It may be red meat and racism.' type of nonsense.

Pfizer gave their own people shots from a different batch than what was given to everyone else. People aren't heroes, they are just looking out for themselves, and in doing so they remain complicit, knowingly or ignorantly.

"They" - the controllers, bankers, secret societies and elite families have been shaping the landscape forever. It is an incestuous revolving door between organizations, governmental and private, that all work against the people for themselves.

Most are not in on some secret plan, but they are still working within a system that perpetuates the narratives set forth by think-tanks. There is a hierarchy to policy planning and distribution, it can only be top-down. We know the organizations that set and distribute the policies. We know who the members of these things are. They openly brag about infiltrating governments.

Compliance is mandated at all levels in varying ways, but the policies come from those nearest the levers of control.

They react this way to resistance because it threatens them. We must be resisting at all times. It isn't futile, this is a continuous cycle that ebbs and flows throughout history. That is my perspective, of course. I'm not saying it is correct or that you should think the same, fwiw. It just makes sense to me.

"At some point, it becomes to difficult to pretend that all of these things are organic, such as all governments agreeing to shut down their countries and enforce the same 'guidelines' unilaterally. "

Having worked in a govt this is absolutly what I think. They had specific plans for pandemics (which I worked on). When they were clearly not going to fly they'll have looked around for any alternative, and there's none better than doing what everyone else was doing.

They were even explicit about this - eg saying we had to lock down because the rest of Europe was locking down. And they were right. It's herd logic.

The only thing that has changed to make covid etc far worse than previous panics is that the herd is now supercharged by phones. The waves of fear and anger are hugely more powerful.

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

I can see it from that perspective, I have some friends who think the same way. I wouldn't say it's a minority position, but I think both are true to some extent.

At some point, it becomes to difficult to pretend that all of these things are organic, such as all governments agreeing to shut down their countries and enforce the same 'guidelines' unilaterally. The few leaders who didn't, mysteriously died.

The 'coincidences' only ever trend in the direction of the state. To me, its the same type of gaslighting (from state actors) as suggesting autism has solely gone up because of the way it is diagnosed. 'Experts are baffled. It may be red meat and racism.' type of nonsense.

Pfizer gave their own people shots from a different batch than what was given to everyone else. People aren't heroes, they are just looking out for themselves, and in doing so they remain complicit, knowingly or ignorantly.

"They" - the controllers, bankers, secret societies and elite families have been shaping the landscape forever. It is an incestuous revolving door between organizations, governmental and private, that all work against the people for themselves.

Most are not in on some secret plan, but they are still working within a system that perpetuates the narratives set forth by think-tanks. There is a hierarchy to policy planning and distribution, it can only be top-down. We know the organizations that set and distribute the policies. We know who the members of these things are. They openly brag about infiltrating governments.

Compliance is mandated at all levels in varying ways, but the policies come from those nearest the levers of control.

They react this way to resistance because it threatens them. We must be resisting at all times. It isn't futile, this is a continuous cycle that ebbs and flows throughout history. That is my perspective, of course. I'm not saying it is correct or that you should think the same, fwiw. It just makes sense to me.

There's not much I disagree with there. I think there may be "top down" edicts but not necessarily explicit ones - its just obvious to everyone involved what they should do if they're paying attention. But most of those will be "here's how to exploit and pump this herd dynamic" and not "now we move to phase 2.5b of the plan".

For example, I can't believe all these leaders really report to the WEF, however much Klaus Schwab brags of "penetrating" ze governments.

What seems far more likely is that the WEF is kind of like a conference organizer. The participants are people with power and people who want power - the elite if you will - but the power doesn't come from the WEF. So they socialize and they're all alike and they share their hopes and strategies for exploiting the masses - and when stuff happens it should be no surprise they act in a way that looks co-ordinated. They all jump on things like covid and climate change precisely because they all see the opportunities it affords them. The oppression evolves organically.

I'd guess that you may agree the herd has some power - in which case our disagreement ultimately might be the balance between them?

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

I believe this stuff is still very much top down. They manufacture most of the things they call crises, many of which don't even exist anywhere but in the media, and many people simply take them at face value without questioning.

The 'herd dynamics' as you accurately point out make it far easier for them to craft and drive these narratives today since communication and messaging is far-reaching. They put on 'table top' exercises like Event 201 in order to simulate their plans before executing them, so that they can study all the possible outcomes of a crisis and steer them in the intended direction, as well as propose solutions to these made-up issues.

They simulate all of it. The people who orchestrated covid were very much aware of how much fear and panic they could drum up - that was the point. It was a military-grade psychological operation. The actual military and 'nudge' units were and are still involved. They gaslit and continue to gaslight people with bot accounts who attack anyone telling the truth, casting doubt on what is being said by anyone who reads it, when you have responses coming from sock-puppet accounts while real people are censored.

None of it was real - overwhelmed hospitals, people dying in the streets, etc, but they used these as tools in order to attain their goals. Their efforts killed millions of people, and mental broke millions more. A process of demoralization, as Yuri Bezmenov once spoke about.

The system is designed in such a way that many of the effects are organic, because most people (even in government) are not aware of the bigger picture and they conform to stay elected. Literal useful idiots, and people who are drawn to positions of power tend to skew towards having psychopathic tendencies, making them ideal candidates to execute inhumane actions against their fellow people. Not only under the guise of safety and decency, but also because they simply don't care about others, and are therefore the exact puppets the controllers seek out and elevate into positions of power.

Mike Benz does a lot of good work talking how they orchestrate some of this stuff. Here is an older video of his where he explains the concept of 'capacity building' and 'capacity crippling', which I had not heard of before:

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1704606709098885629

The genius of these tactics is that once they create an industry out of something, it is very hard to dismantle because they appeal to the humanity of the average person - "think of all the people who won't have jobs, we can't just eliminate an entire sector even if it is all based on lies. But it's not a lie, shut-up or we'll arrest you!"

Yes, I have this discussion a lot - and I'm in a very small minority who believe its bottom up.

To me they're kind of unfalsifiable hypotheses - but as with "science" I'd much rather carry around my unfalsifiable hypothesis than yours on this one!

Also I feel many people "on our side" give "them" too much credit and respect - almost deifying them as all-powerful beings who are 10 steps ahead of anything. What's the point in resisting if that's the case? It feels almost like fetish with some people.

And I think its not the case - they are just humans like us and most of them actually believe their own bullshit. For me there's no way eg bill gates is unjabbed. Even pfizer people who covered up the side-effects will be jabbed.

To be fair most people would be terrified to have an authentic opinion. Which is how they get away with it (until they don't).

I do think there is a difference between our situation now and, say, communist USSR or other historical totalitarian regimes. They seemed very much to be top-down, with the course of events predetermined by a high committee - as per agenda 2030 etc that you cite.

But I think things are different now. The elites now gain their power from exploiting human herd dynamics - riding the waves of panic, fear and hate, pumping them up if they can - but not by creating the waves themselves which is much harder and more costly to them.

Eg whatever the origins of covid I cannot see how anyone could have forecast the total panic it caused - and the commensurately huge opportunity it gave to extend tyranny.

Where I live the government spent about 2 weeks literally saying covid was not a big deal, the most important thing was to keep going as normal. Then they realized they'd be washed away unless they got on board with the wave of hysteria sweeping through the herd.

Which gives me great hope for humanity. I think we evolved to have 95% of ppl simply want to follow - without any conception of good or bad, right or wrong, except doing whatever the herd was doing or told them to do. You'd need that in a tribe that had to work together to kill food, resist other tribes etc.

But there have always been about 5% who are different, who think independently and are connected to reality outside the herd. Most of the time these dissidents are persecuted and harassed but they are the ones from which all progress comes - and sooner or later the herd ends up following them. By which I mean us!

For example I think we owe most of our traditions of western freedom (which are currently being eroded but which something happened to create in the first place) to the persecution of dissidents in europe in the 18th century. The puritans had a continent to go to and build a new society based on freedom from that persecution - and created America.

I think a golden age is just around the corner - and bitcoin and nostr are the new continent where we can build a new world based on freedom.

a drug used in the uk to basically put old people out of their misery. perhaps reasonable imo if they're definitley dying but during covid docs who were too scared to visit nursing homes just prescribed tons of midazolam remotely.

no way to know how many old people were essentially euthanised this way but seems very unlikely to be zero.

The purpose is to habituate the masses to their coming enslavement

Farmer friend of mine got some pigs partly as pets for kids. They were terrifying. Totally obsessed with food. You went anywhere near the pen they started freaking out, hurling themselves against the walls because they thought you might feed them, or they could eat you.

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

So I think to grasp that you have to get into what magnetism is. I will try summarize as best I can.

Aether: energy at rest, [the original definition of] inertia, pure potential, the default state of energy, counterspace

Counterspace: unmanifested energy, the state of rest, zero point energy

Fields: modalities of the Aether, different states of excitation

Gravity: an anti-field

Dielectricity: the engine of electric fields. Not electricity, not magnetism and not gravity.

Electricity: the combination of magnetism and dielectricity

Magnetism: the expression of the dielectric field AND the loss of inertia (losing the state of rest). In other words, going from the default state of rest (Aether) into expressing dielectricity as a magnetic field.

Light: a disturbance of the Aether. Tesla defined it as a sound wave in the Aether.

Waves: an action, not a 'thing'. When a light is 'waving', it is the frequency and amplitude of the Aether disturbance that results in this effect. No different than the ripples 'waving' through water when disturbed. When light stops waving, it is no longer disturbing the medium and therefore no longer perceptible.

Modalities: different states. Ice, water and steam are all modalities of the same thing, affected or mediated by pressure and temperature, just like fields are all modalities of the same thing - the Aether.

Imagine a donut with a tube or rod passing through the middle, almost like a washer on a bolt. The bolt is the dielectric field, and that is what powers the magnetic field (the washer). These oscillate back and forth as 'lines' of interference always represented in the same toroidal pattern, creating the phenomenon of what we call a magnetic field. The dielectric field 'flows' from north to south, driving the magnetic field to diverge from the bottom of a magnet, looping back around to converge over the top and back into the center, creating the toroidal pattern continuously. You can actually tell where the north and south 'poles' of a magnet are under a ferrocell by the red and blue fringe shift - each 'pole' tends to one or the other. As I have learned, magnets don't actually have poles, they have the inverse of counterspace, or the opposite of the state of rest as defined above. The dielectric field is the inverse of a magnetic field, ying/Yang if you will, but they are inherent to eachother and cannot exist in isolation.

In order to magnetize an object, it requires a combination of elements that exhibit high capacitance, or how capable a material is of storing electric charge. A neodymium permanent magnet is a combination of mostly neodymium, iron and boron, which are high capacitance elements. When you magnetize these elements, you would typically hit it with a high voltage electric current. What happens in the process is that the electricity (as defined above) loses its dielectric component, resulting in a permanent magnetic charge which is stored in these highly capacitive elements.

If matter is high frequency light, then everything is inherently electric (in the broad sense of the term) and matter is physically manifested energy. Funny enough, even an apple manifests in a similar pattern as a magnetic field, which is fitting when Newton considered the apple falling to the ground. As I currently understand it, we cannot perceive the vibrations because they are such a high frequency that they appear static. Although an apple isn't magnetic, since it has little or no capacitance, it is still electric, just like everything material. And, like all matter, it is therefore subject to the same phenomenon of falling, or returning back to a default state of rest. This is the acceleration towards counterspace, or acceleration back to the inertial plane, or colloquially, falling down to the ground, which would be the inertial plane or where matter is at rest. It is nature trending towards the state it favours most, back to default, also also why magnets accelerate towards eachother, they are trending towards counterspace or back to the default state of rest.

In understanding the nature of magnetism, Tesla created the AC motor by inverting the magnetic field. I believe the correct field array is the key to discovering things like 'unlimited' energy.

Tesla's quote about energy frequency and vibration is really quite genius. All matter is energy, vibration and the rate at which something vibrates (frequency) coupled with its elemental makeup is what creates the reality we live in. In that sense, it is totally possible that it is a holographic simulation. Another off topic curiousity is how we can get a glimpse of this through altering our perception with psychedelics or meditation, where we can observe these geometric patterns that aren't otherwise perceptible.

Simple, yet complicated, but in my opinion, accurate.

Well, really I appreciate you taking the trouble to set all that out and explain your view. However if I'm honest I find it impossible to follow with the effort I'm willing to put into it. There are many concepts that have no meaning to me, and statements that I cannot connect to my understanding of reality without doing more work than I'm willing to at this point (also I have no particular beef with the mainstream account of gravity and such). I hope you don't feel it's been wasted - maybe I'll return to this someday.

To pick up something else you said (about living in a simulation), one reason I would not be inclined to devote a lot of energy to this stuff is that I don't really see any point in taking one view rather than another. The entirety of scientific enquiry reaches a dead end when you ask the question: "how do I know what I'm seeing is real". There is no answer to that - at least none which can be reached with the scientific method, which relies on the notion of objective truth, which can easily be shown not to have any logical meaning.

So where I got to with science is that basically there is my consciousness - essentially just a viewpoint from which I perceive things, including my own body and feelings - and that's all that can be proven to me using science.

The interesting stuff is then what describes or explains my consciousness, as defined. I'm interested now by ideas of whether consciousness is inextricably connected to my physical body or not - and, if not, what context it exists in, and whether other consciousnesses are connected by that context.

Things like near-death experiences could be taken to suggest that consciousness is NOT limited to the physical body, and does not terminate at death.

My hypothesis for this is that there is, let's call it, a 5th dimension (speaking extremely loosely) on which consciousness exists. It connects in some way to physical bodies but the connection is not strictly necessary or permanent. And perhaps consciousnesses can interact directly when they are not connected to physical bodies.

All of that seems consistent with the science I know - and cannot be disproven. Nor is it provable, or falsifiable, but I've been down to the bottom of physics and it seems to me that isn't either! So if you're going to carry around a non-falsifiable view of existence it might as well be a mind-expanding one that allows life beyond physical existence, and communication between consciousnesses on a non-physical plane.. ..and which seems to be roughly shared by the majority of humans who have been born!

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

No, I'm was describing the nature of this system is to seek equilibrium, be it through pressure mediation or dielectricity accelerating towards counterspace. When you open a pressured container it instantly equalizes with the environment. Vacuums don't exist in nature. It was Aristotle who said 'nature abhors a vacuum', suggesting nature cannot tolerate a void or empty space. And I would say he was correct, we don't observe vacuums in nature, only Hollywood fiction and imagination.

I'm not sure you read all of what I last posted. I understand the terms are technical. I'm not trying to hide behind technical jargon. I have had to read and listen to the same things over and over to build a mental model and understanding. I clearly stated that magnetic attraction doesn't exist. It sounds like a distinction without a difference, but what we call magnetic attraction is dielectric acceleration. This is a very important difference. There is no force involved. It is the same as a pressured container equalizing once open. There is no force involved in that, either. It is the system equalizing to it's natural state of rest and equilibrium. Forget forces, not even gravity is claimed to be a force.

'If you want to understand the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration' - Tesla

What he was getting at here is all matter is energy at varying high frequencies. All matter induces current in the Aether. That means all matter is dielectric in nature. You, me, that desk, a car. Everything.

Electricity, magnetism, and gravity are all expressions of dielectricity. Any object falling to the ground is the result of dielectricity seeking its null point, accelerating towards counterspace, or a state of rest. It really is that simple, but understanding it isn't quite as simple because we have to throw out the indoctrinated assumptions we make based on fallacies we believe to be true, and there are a lot of prerequisites we need to grasp for that understanding to fall into place.

Just like light doesn't actually travel, it is the rate of induction of the Aether and it has a speed limit depending on the density of the medium is it being perceived through. The rate of induction is inversely proportional to the density of the medium. The satisfactorily explains why light is perceived to be travelling at different rates through different mediums, otherwise, one would have to explain where light gets the energy to speed up again once it exists a material object such as a glass.

Even if the Earth was a spinning ball, this would still be the best explanation for what gravity is.

Oh sorry, I see that you have explained "dielectric acceleration" as being synonymous with "magnetic attraction".

But surely that would apply only to magnetic objects and not, for example, an apple?

Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

No, I'm was describing the nature of this system is to seek equilibrium, be it through pressure mediation or dielectricity accelerating towards counterspace. When you open a pressured container it instantly equalizes with the environment. Vacuums don't exist in nature. It was Aristotle who said 'nature abhors a vacuum', suggesting nature cannot tolerate a void or empty space. And I would say he was correct, we don't observe vacuums in nature, only Hollywood fiction and imagination.

I'm not sure you read all of what I last posted. I understand the terms are technical. I'm not trying to hide behind technical jargon. I have had to read and listen to the same things over and over to build a mental model and understanding. I clearly stated that magnetic attraction doesn't exist. It sounds like a distinction without a difference, but what we call magnetic attraction is dielectric acceleration. This is a very important difference. There is no force involved. It is the same as a pressured container equalizing once open. There is no force involved in that, either. It is the system equalizing to it's natural state of rest and equilibrium. Forget forces, not even gravity is claimed to be a force.

'If you want to understand the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration' - Tesla

What he was getting at here is all matter is energy at varying high frequencies. All matter induces current in the Aether. That means all matter is dielectric in nature. You, me, that desk, a car. Everything.

Electricity, magnetism, and gravity are all expressions of dielectricity. Any object falling to the ground is the result of dielectricity seeking its null point, accelerating towards counterspace, or a state of rest. It really is that simple, but understanding it isn't quite as simple because we have to throw out the indoctrinated assumptions we make based on fallacies we believe to be true, and there are a lot of prerequisites we need to grasp for that understanding to fall into place.

Just like light doesn't actually travel, it is the rate of induction of the Aether and it has a speed limit depending on the density of the medium is it being perceived through. The rate of induction is inversely proportional to the density of the medium. The satisfactorily explains why light is perceived to be travelling at different rates through different mediums, otherwise, one would have to explain where light gets the energy to speed up again once it exists a material object such as a glass.

Even if the Earth was a spinning ball, this would still be the best explanation for what gravity is.

OK, thanks.

"Any object falling to the ground is the result of dielectricity seeking its null point, accelerating towards counterspace"

This gives me the explanation I'm after.

But you have used 2 words that I have not heard before -"dielectricity" and "counterspace". Nor can I find any generally accepted definitions of these - at least none which make sense to me in the context you've used them.

Can you define or explain them please? (Even better would be to put this in the context of the greater explanation of the object falling).

Many thanks!