Kimberly Biss, MD: "I'm an Ob-Gyn. I've been practicing since 1998. If you include my residency training I've probably taken care of roughly 8,000 pregnant women. I was completely in shock when they toyed with the idea of providing pregnant women these injections they call 'vaccinations,' because we never give anything brand new to a pregnant patient. We tell them not to eat tuna fish, don't color your hair, but let's go get this brand-new experiment injected in your arm. It just didn't make sense to me. […]
"In all honesty, during 2020 when the Plandemic (or whatever you want to call it) was occuring, we did have some sick patients. We did hospitalize a lot of patients just for observation. But I never had a pregnant woman end up on a ventilator during 2020. We didn't have any deaths from COVID during that year. Our pregnant patients did well, for the most part. I honestly don't feel they would have needed this anyway, even if we thought this was a good thing for them. […]
16:38 Dr. Biss: "What we're told from our governing bodies, like The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), is that if a woman gets a respiratory virus and she's pregnant, she's going to get sicker than a non-pregnant woman, because of the changes in her anatomy and some other changes that occur during pregnancy. That's kind of the schtick to give all of our pregnant patients the flu vaccine. […]
"I will tell you in 30 years I've never had a pregnant woman die of the flu. I mean, I've had some admitted just for observation. They say pregnant women are immunocompromised. But I would argue the opposite. I think there's something protective in pregnant women, because I don't have a sickly patient population. I have a very varied demographic in age group of people, I mean all ethnicities, etc. They're not sickly people. I think there's something protective in women. I think they've been telling us the opposite so we give them shots [chuckles]. […]
24:22 Jerm: "Do you think it was fear?"
Dr. Biss: "The fear was on the populace. […] The fear was definitely a factor. I will tell you, to get a pregnant woman to take any medication takes an act of God. They won't even take an aspirin."
Jerm: "I've just been through that [chuckles]."
Dr. Biss: "But 65—70% of our pregnant women went and lined up for these injections.
"I will tell you Dr. Thorp's wife, Maggie, is an attorney. Through FOIA she uncovered the fact that ACOG in April 2021 received $11—$13 million through a trust that was set up by HHS (which is our Health and Human Services, which is our tax dollars) to market these injections. […] If you pull up ACOG and you look up COVID it still says, today, to inject every woman thinking of getting pregnant, pregnant, or breast feeding. Because if they get COVID they're going to die. I'm mean it's crazy. In 2024 they're still saying this.
"So they marketed this. If you can get. . . who usually makes the medical decisions in a family? The wife, the woman, the mother. So this was heavily marketed to women. Pfizer made, I don't know, trillions of bucks? I mean, it's all money. It's follow the money, as sadly most things are in medicine today."
Kimberly Biss, MD, Ob-Gyn with Jerm @ 00:15—01:45, 16:38—18:22 & 24:22—26:30 https://podbay.fm/p/jerm-warfare-the-battle-of-ideas/e/1733893642?t=15
Jerm: "I think a very good way of looking at it is just simply the lack of trust in the medical industry now. And I really don't like saying that, because there are so many good doctors, even yourself, for example. And you all get lumped into now the same thing: the medical industry. But it really does seem to have destroyed its image in the last few years."
Kimberly Biss, MD: "Yeah. It's sad. And I've been asked this before: How is it that so many doctors fell in step and just couldn't think about what was happening? I often joke if Tony Fauci told everybody to slap a dildo on their forehead they would have done it.
"But I feel that when I started medical school in the early 1990s was when the concept of 'evidence-based medicine' started. And what that basically is was the beginning of cookbook medicine, where there's algorithms you go down to find a diagnosis and then you have a cookbook recipe for how you're supposed to manage or treat the condition. If you veer off of either path then you're questioned: 'Well, why are you doing this? Why are you not doing this?' You have to go in front of peer review, you might lose your medical license.
"I think the two things that system caused, which I'm not saying standardization is a not a good thing, but it's caused doctors to not question authority, because they feel whoever created this evidence knows more than them. And then there's no need to think anymore, see, because you're just looking at algorithms and recipes.
"We've really lost the practice of medicine. We treat patients as if they come off an assembly line and everybody gets the same treatment and not everybody is built the same. We model a lot of medical practices after the airline industry, and you can clearly see how that's going with Boeing. [chuckles]
"I think that's why. And sadly too, medicine in the United States is very corporatized. There's very few standalone physicians. Everybody has a boss and nobody wants to lose their job. Sadly in all of this, who suffers the most but the patients."
Kimberly Biss, MD, OB-GYN with Jerm @ 08:20–10:46 https://podbay.fm/p/jerm-warfare-the-battle-of-ideas/e/1733893642
GMoney: "Is there something with morning sun that's different? Are there different wavelengths if you get out in morning sun versus in the afternoon? I was trying to understand that. So literally go out and look at the sun or be in the sun in the morning."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Well, you got to understand the difference in the sun and I don't think this one is too difficult for people to get. You know that there's seven colors in light when we break it with a prism. I think everybody knows about that from Newton or Pink Floyd's album cover. But you don't understand at that time, that's when red and blue light are dominant and they're balanced by each other. That's actually the signal that turns on your pituitary gland and makes all the hormones in your body. Here's the crazy part, and this is where a lot of bitcoiners get it wrong.
"You know that I've kind of popularized junk maintenance and garden maintenance for bitcoiners, about sunning your balls and all that. Those guys keep thinking that sunning your balls raises your testosterone. It's actually the other way around. When UV light shows up, because remember how UV light works, it's not present in the morning in most places. I don't know where you're located, but in the northern hemisphere right now, probably only the first maybe 20 degrees of latitude gets UV light relatively early. There are certain places in the northern hemisphere that don't get any UV light at all.
"What is UV light designed to do? It turns off some of the hormones in your body. What are those hormones that I'm talking about? Those are the sex steroid hormones.
"So realize if you never get in UV light or you live in a place that doesn't have it, you technically don't have an off switch for those hormones.
"Now, the flip side of that is, do you make those hormones if you never get in the AM light? The answer is you usually don't. So when people have asked me, 'Why do so many young bitcoiners have low testosterone levels?' I just answered. They never go out in the morning at all to make these hormones.
"So a lot of people wind up going to these anti-aging doctors and are getting popped with testosterone and they think they're doing a good thing. And then the females that I worry about, especially the females in bitcoin, they really make a lot of mistakes. Why? Because they rarely go out. They've got to deal with the social conventions of not getting their tits and their ass and their perineum out in the sun because of the social conventions. Then they're out all hours of the night or they're in front of a camera doing bitcoin content, doing it right at the wrong time. I just think that they're making huge mistakes, and I want them to kind of fix that issue."
Dr. Jack Kruse with nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3uamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwp6kytnhv4kxcmmjv3jhytnwv46z7qghwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx7mnnv968xtn0wfnj7qpqp0azx5nzq2da6vjlkf5rveuc2r0zj3jhhrz6kvhlm3sd7u055s4s2tmsza @ 29:52–32:46 https://rumble.com/v6hkze4-rugpull-radio-ep-108-special-guest-dr-jack-kruse.html?start=1792
Dr. Jack Kruse: "We spend more money on healthcare than any other country and we have horrible outcomes. If that's not an anti-bitcoin idea. . . we need to do exactly the opposite. I think it begins when we get somebody in and we stop doing the same shit that we've been doing for 75 years. […]
"This is Rockefeller medicine. It came from something called the Flexner report in 1911 where he hired a guy named Abraham Flexner who went in and basically got rid of all the vitality in medicine and said we're going to do allopathic medicine. And what was that? Drugs for every ill. That idea went into the curriculum, not only in medical and dental school, but in just everything across the board.
"That idea then has been, how shall I say, habitualized in the public. In other words, if you go in and you're sick and you don't get a drug prescription, then you've got a big issue.
"Yesterday, I think on Twitter, I actually posted a picture of one of the prescriptions I wrote for one of my patients in 2017. I said when you get a prescription like this from a doctor, then you know you're dealing with somebody who's decentralized. The hard part is, you're a bitcoiner, I write that prescription for you, you're gonna say, 'Well, what do you mean, ''Eat like a great white shark?'' What do you mean, ''Ground like the Sphinx?'' How do all these things work?' Because most bitcoiners are pretty skeptical and they're like this is bullshit. […]
"The thing is, when you go to the doctor routinely, you begin to realize this is a marketing game. They are selling me shit I don't need. They're telling me that many of the tests for screening, these are good things. They're 'evidence-based.'
"Well, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to sit down, like if you got a beautiful wife who has beautiful breasts, why do I want to radiate her breasts with a mammogram machine, when the actual radiation she really needs is from the sun?
"Maybe I need to buy my wife a place where she can take her top and her bottom off instead of going to get a mammogram every year. How about that for a radical idea change?"
Dr. Jack Kruse with nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxjmnxduhsz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ekk7um5wgh8qatz9uq3vamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun9d35hgetn9ehhyee0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshszythwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn99uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsz9mhwden5te0dehhxarj9ehkuumpw3ejummjvuhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj94ex2mrp0yh8wmrkwvh8xurpvdjj7qpqp0azx5nzq2da6vjlkf5rveuc2r0zj3jhhrz6kvhlm3sd7u055s4sh7w373 @ 53:00–55:37 https://rumble.com/v6hkze4-rugpull-radio-ep-108-special-guest-dr-jack-kruse.html?start=3180
GMoney: "Essentially, I kind of narrowed it down to, 'Basically, humans are kind of like solar-powered, quantum-biomechanical humanoids that use light as almost this nuclear fission, kind of.' Was that somewhat accurate?"
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Well, I'm gonna dial you down a little bit. I'm gonna tell you that humans are like complicated houseplants. That's it. I think it's even a better way to do it, because if we get into your vernacular and your definition, probably people's brains will start coming out of their ears. And I don't really want them to do that. Because I personally don't believe what I teach people is really difficult to do. I think actually it's pretty easy.
"And that's when it mimics bitcoin. I think buying bitcoin is also a pretty easy thing to do. It's a vote against everything that's centralized every time you buy it.
"I think every time you pay attention to the light, people realize, hopefully some people realize this, you can get out in the light and do the right things. But when the sun sets and you put the computer on, you put the phone on, you just broke the rule. I mean, that's like going out and buying a shitcoin. It's like becoming an XRP maxi or a Hexican. I mean, it just doesn't make any sense.
"The thing is, when you do that, you're subtracting time from your ledger. And when you understand that you're doing that, because it's just like a quarter […] There's two sides of the coin, heads and tails. The heads is getting out in the sun. But tails is making sure it's dark when it's dark. Most women who will listen to this, they'd probably be stunned, but light at night is the number one cause of breast cancer and ovarian cancer in the world."
GMoney: "Interesting. Yeah, I kind of equate it to, 'Hey, you've got this Ferrari engine that you're feeding high octane to when the sun is out. At night, when you pop open your phone in complete darkness, you're literally throwing Hawaiian Punch into the Ferrari to try to make it run.' Is that kind of similar?"
Dr. Jack Kruse: "That is absolutely a great analogy."
Dr. Jack Kruse with GMONEY @ 27:05–29:17 https://rumble.com/v6hkze4-rugpull-radio-ep-108-special-guest-dr-jack-kruse.html?start=1625
Dr Sara Pugh: "I'm really excited for your view on the aging thing […] I've never heard you completely unleash what you think aging is […] "
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Yeah. Well, I would tell you that the answer has been staring all of us in the face. This is where I give Doug Wallace probably. . . this is the reason why I revere him. The wiring diagram in the inner mitochondrial membrane tells you the whole truth. […]
"It goes back to Faraday's experiments in the 1850s. Basically the Fo head spins, you got an electric current coming through. That induces electric and magnetic fields. Because the inner mitochondrial membrane is only 6nm, that means the charge differential between them is 30 million volts per meter. Realize that you have a lightning bolt present in every single crista of your mitochondrial membrane. So that tells you about power. […]
"So when you think about what I've said about melanin, what I've said about wideband semiconduction, that we're able to make light stronger than the sun and it's inside us, and I just told you about scale, you start going, 'Wait a minute. Now I know where Jack's going with longevity. It turns out who's ever got the best mitochondrial redox wins the game of longevity.' That's exactly what I've been saying for 20 years.
"But the problem is no one's really understood the wiring diagram of the inner mitochondrial membrane and leptin prescription. It's all codified. So when you have the Fo head, remember the Fo head spins because of four red light frequencies. What happens on the inner mitochondrial membrane? You basically strip electrons out from food. So food is basically just electrons that are powered up by sun from photosynthesis.
"What's the key part to the calorie restriction in the mTOR story in mammals? In between cytochrome proteins we have VDR receptors. That's the vitamin D receptor. Think about that, that when you're getting conversion of sunlight from your skin into your inner mitochondrial membrane. Remember, that light cannot get from the surface to your mitochondrial membrane. But yet we have vitamin D receptors inside of us. This is Noether's theorem coming straight to your doorstep.
"What happens is it interrupts oxidative phosphorylation. But why don't we die? Why does ATP still get made? Because red light stimulates the ATPase. So the combination of UV light, whether it's UVA, B, C or VUV light, will stop electron chain transport. You. will. not. need. to. eat. Why is that important?
"What's the other part of this, Sara, that people have forgotten, that I've said ad nauseum? Cells put electronic energy at the electronic state at the vibrational level. Why can we still make energy at night when we're sleeping and the sun's not out? Because it's stored in our bonds. How do you think melatonin releases its power at night? We all think it's a hormone of darkness. It's not. It's a hormone that's made during the day that's powered up. We harvest the light at night.
"And everything that's inside of us all these chromophore proteins what are they? They're there for a reason. […] We're using the light outside to create the light inside. […] Now you're beginning to understand what Noether's theorem is all about, is that energy in the system is telling things in space, and in time, how to bend. It's actually how non-linear optics really works. And all these chromophore proteins that we find like the flavins, B12, vitamin A at 328 nm light, or mTOR at 380. When you start looking at all these biochemicals that everybody knows, and you start seeing absorption and emission spectra, and you understand what I just told you, you start to realize this is like a fireworks show at the Fourth of July.
"And melanin is designed to absorb all that light and put any of the excess energy in water which we use at night to store at the vibrational level. Remember what makes the water in the cell? The mitochondria! What makes most of the melatonin in the body? The mitochondria! See we're back to the story. Where you can put me into the longevity story: it's all about mitochondria redox."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Dr. Sara Pugh @ 42:00–48:03 https://youtu.be/cy8cByk8H00&t=2520
David Rasnick, PhD: "HPV: Don't Get Tested, Don't Get Vaccinated
"HPV stands for human papilloma virus. Almost everyone has been infected with HPV at one point or another. Most people quickly become immune to the virus and never show any symptoms. Occasionally HPV causes warts, if it does anything at all.
"The HPV industry is founded on the belief, for that's all it is, that most cervical cancers are caused by HPV. A quarter century of intense research was unable to come up with even a hint of proof that viruses, including HPV, cause human cancer. […]
"HPV virus would be an extremely inefficient carcinogen, even if it did cause cervical cancer. Every year, only one in 10,000 women who were ever infected with HPV develops cervical cancer in the United States. HPV certainly can't be held responsible for the 30% of cervical cancers in women who were never infected with the virus. Just as clearly, the HPV vaccine could not have prevented the cervical cancer in women who had never been infected with the virus.
"While HPV is relatively benign, the vaccine is not. [As of 2017,] out of all the serious vaccine adverse events reported to the Centers for Disease Control, more than half come from the HPV vaccines. HPV vaccines alone account for 25% of all serious adverse events of all 80 vaccines currently licensed in the United States. As of December 14 2017, there were 55,788 adverse events following an HPV vaccination. Of those, 10,980 did not recover, 2,467 were disabled, 146 had cervical cancer (recall the vaccine is supposed to prevent cervical cancer and it didn't in these people), and 406 died."
David Rasnick, PhD @ 00:00–00:37 & 01:23–02:48 https://youtu.be/Jctnaz9s6W8&t=0
Professor Stephen Reicher: "Now the first thing to say about that is when you do a meta-analysis you find that the overall level of obedience in the Milgram studies is 42%; 58% of people disobey. These are the disobedient studies, or the very least, of the obedience and disobedience studies. Anything which suggests that there is some inherent state that makes us obey cannot account for the fact that actually the majority of people disobey. […]
"The second problem is what we call the experimenter's voice. Because as you probably know, Milgram, who was actually in many ways, he was a great theatrical impresario. These were brilliant bits of theater, of live theater, of performance theater, if you like. He scripted them carefully. If, as they nearly always did, people showed reticence during the studies, if they said, 'What? Are you sure? Is he okay? Should I go on?' he scripted four prompts:
1. 'Please continue' or 'Please go on'
2. 'The experiment requires that you continue'
3. 'It's absolutely essential that you continue' and
4. 'You have no other choice. You must go on.'
"Now it's self-evident looking at those only one of them is an order. The first three are either requests or justifications or a combination. 'Please. . .': a request. 'The experiment requires. . . 'This is important. . .' justified in terms of the science of the experiment.
"But the last one is an order. You have no other choice. You must go on.
"Now if people were only obeying orders then you would have thought that that last prompt would be the most effective one. So what percentage of people carry on after these different prompts? After the first one, 64%. Second, 46%. Third, 10%. Fourth, nobody.
"Nobody. Every time the fourth prompt is used, every time you use orders people stop. There has been a recent replication by Berger. And again he finds exactly the same thing. Each time you're given an order, you stop. And we've also done a replication. And again you give the order and people say, 'What do you mean I've got no choice? Of course I've got a choice. I've got to stop.' That's what they do. That's what they say.
"The one thing, if you take nothing else from this talk, the one thing you should take is Milgram's research is emphatically not showing that people have a tendency to obey orders. If anything, they show the opposite."
Stephen Reicher @ 20:21–23:43 https://youtu.be/RFOI6FJQBXY&t=1221
Dr. Jack Kruse: "I'm not trying to tell you food is not important, but it's about fourth or fifth on the list. OK? And we elevate it, especially in bitcoin. They think diet and exercise is one and two. It's not.
"And if you put that pinned tweet up again, the most amazing part of that study, take a look at what it really says. It says that smoking cigarettes is actually more healthy than a lack of sun. That should blow your mind when you read it. Because if that doesn't explain to you just how incredible sunlight is for your health, then you're not going to get it.
"The point that I try to make to people, if I can get them into the light and then keep their nights dark, that's like 80% of the decentralized message of how the circadian mechanism works in us."
[…]
Dr. Jack Kruse: "You know how the cliche is, looks can be deceiving? Well they can, and they can because of the way non-native EMF interacts with our mitochondrial time machines. And when those time machines get broken in the wrong organ, it can lead to your life going. […]
"It doesn't matter what you look like. It matters that you are taking no medication, that you don't need a doctor's help, that you're plugging into the decentralized network that's nature, much like you did earlier and put that pinned tweet up that's been sitting on Twitter for a long time.
"People find it hard to believe that if you get light, water and magnetism right, that you can stay away from guys like me for a long time."
Dr. Jack Kruse with @GMONEY @ 33:40–34:34 & 40:35–41:40 https://rumble.com/v6hkze4-rugpull-radio-ep-108-special-guest-dr-jack-kruse.html?start=2020
Aleena Kanner: "The visual issues [post-LASIK] […] are things like halos, night glare. People will have a lot, a lot of dry eyes. That's the number one complaint: chronic dry eyes. Because they're cutting, they're severing the corneal nerve. When you sever the corneal nerve you're decreasing tear production to the eye. Every single LASIK or PRK surgery (PRK is slightly different but I'm pretty sure it has the same sort of variables that happen afterwards) you're automatically signing yourself up for dry eyes. Whether you feel those dry eyes or not, that's a different case.
"There are things you can do for dry eyes. There's something called a Bruder mask. […] There's another mask online that's just heat and you plug it into an electrical outlet and you get automatic heat coming to your eye. And you kind of press it into your eye and it will stimulate tear production. And so that's really a powerful thing for people who are struggling with (just in general) dry eyes (or from post-LASIK). […]
"And then people that have actual binocular dysfunction that get LASIK they will have double vision. Their entire world view will be off. […] I've had two patients come in that have been suicidal post-LASIK because of the complications they had. Because they both had visual dysfunction, actual dysfunction, that was underlying, that was not looked at. So that's much more rare but it does happen. There are support groups, like you mentioned.
"From a PRI-body-movement-asymmetry perspective, what we see is that because we're overcorrected, because when we're getting that eye prescription, we are usually dominant over one side of our body. We were never put into neutral place first. The prescription is going to most likely be off. And that prescription is going to pull us more into our pattern, whether it's a more extension pattern, or it's a more asymmetrical pattern, we're going to find that that LASIK eye surgery will keep us locked up.
"What I'll see with people is I'll do sessions with them, three, four, five sessions, and they're not making changes. And that's because that LASIK is really overriding everything I'm doing. So until I get them a new prescription, I'm going to be stuck fighting with their eyes. And then what we'll typically do with a new prescription, they'll have to get glasses, which is literally the reason they got LASIK in the first place. So it's heartbreaking to tell somebody that 'Hey, you have to get glasses now.'
"But they'll have to get glasses. And usually it'll be a different prescription that maybe has some astigmatism correction or plus. So if they got corrected for distance, they're now going to have a plus correction where it's going to change how they understand space. And it's going to to lighten up that distance prescription to go in the other direction of plus sphere.
[…]
"Some of these people will come in with chronic pain and I'll line it up and it'll be like, 'Oh, we had LASIK on June 2023, and then September 2023 is when your pain, your hip pain, was excruciating, because you couldn't get out of it.' Before LASIK, if you took your glasses off then your body could get to neutral. And you take your glasses off for maybe a few hours a day. Even if it was a wrong prescription, you're allowing your body to still have that oscillation. Now that is 24/7 on you.
"So it's something to really consider before ever doing. . . I mean I think most people that do it that have pain regret it, unfortunately. But there are things you can do. Seeing a provider that has understanding in this field is really something you have to do. And people will travel when they've had LASIK, because those people are quite desperate if they're in pain."
Aleena Kanner, postural restoration provider and certified athletic trainer, with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 01:34:48–01:39:40 https://youtu.be/ZSaRFltisYY&t=5688
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "When you think about all the postural and biomechanical stuff, it's a brain issue, or it's controlled by the brain."
Aleena Kanner: "It's all a brain issue. That's why the mainstream media on posture drives me crazy. 'Shoulders down and back. Do this exercise.' It's just a brain problem. You're not in this hunched position for any other reason than you need to breathe. Your brain is just trying to get you to breathe better."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Yeah, When you're doing the 'shoulders back and down, stand up straight' thing you're shutting off all your breathing through your back."
Aleena Kanner: "Yeah, you're not getting any."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Maybe you want to talk about that a little bit on some of the exercises you're looking for expansion through the back to show that you're breathing correctly, 360°."
Aleena Kanner: "Yeah. Your lungs actually live up into your chest wall and into your back. All this demonization of not breathing into the chest is wild to me because we need expansion up here.
"And that doesn't mean that we need our neck to pull upwards [hunches shoulders]. We just need 360 expansion up into our chest, into our upper back, our posterior mediastinum. Our vagus nerve lies right in between your shoulder blades over there.
"When you're getting that breath there, you're actually stimulating the vagus nerve. You're stimulating your parasympathetic nervous system to pick up some speed and shut down your sympathetics.
"That's why breathing is so powerful. Even if you're just in a yoga class doing breathing, it's still very powerful for people. Now add a positional component and wow, you can make a world of a difference for somebody."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "You want to dispel belly breathing real quick?"
Aleena Kanner: "Yeah, belly breathing. Belly breathing is going to force you forward even more. First of all, your lungs don't live in your belly. That's number one. They literally live up into your chest, they come down into your rib cage. That's why you have the ribs. They're protecting your lungs, essentially. Your belly can rise ever so slightly when you breathe. That's fine. That's normal.
"But when I'm seeing these people have massive belly shifts, and no ability to move air anywhere else, I know that there's a lot of problems happening here. I know that this person has been taught faulty breathing, has practiced faulty breathing, and their whole center of mass is forward.
"Because when you breathe only into your belly, your rib cage has to actually elevate into extension, your pelvis has to dump forward, because the air is going forward instead of ever having some pressurization. So when you learn to breathe into your chest you can actually pressurize. Your belly will still expand ever so slightly, but your lung tissue is getting the movement.
"They say the upper third part of the lungs is the most limited to get air into, which is literally right up here."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Yup. I think that also has the highest density of alveoli too, so you get better gas exchange there."
Aleena Kanner: "I think so, too. Yeah. It's the most important place."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "It's better, actually. Yeah."
Aleena Kanner: "Right. Even just teaching somebody one technique can be the world of a difference for them, just to get air back there. Getting the rib cage into that internally rotated position instead of lifting upwards is going to change your whole center of mass. You can't force it; you have to do it through the breath. You have to breathe your way into these positions. That's why this posture stuff on the internet drives me bonkers because it's all forceful exercises, and it's not actually making significant change."
Aleena Kanner, postural restoration provider and certified athletic trainer, with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 01:27:14–01:30:12 https://youtu.be/ZSaRFltisYY&t=5234
Senator Elizabeth Warren [via Daily Caller]: "[…] And yet, he wants to keep a piece of the action on every one of these anti-vax lawsuits. And what that means potentially is, as Secretary of HHS, he can make those lawsuits a whole lot more profitable. In fact, he may have the opportunity to bankrupt the vaccine manufacturers and then nobody gets vaccines."
Robert Barnes: "What's extraordinary about this is one, the confession through projection, pretending that Kennedy is motivated by money. Right? Not Elizabeth Warren. Been a corporate whore her whole political career. Has been a war whore as well. […]
"And then the second component of it is the degree to which she's admitting that the pharmaceutical industry is causing net harm. A pharmaceutical industry doesn't have to worry about Robert Kennedy or worry about being bankrupted, if their products are safe and effective. It's only if their products are not safe, if they're not effective.
"In other words, what they're all admitting is. . . I mean, vaccine companies existed for forever prior to the special immunities passed in the mid-1980s. Right? The only drug companies that went bankrupt on a vaccine prior to 1986 was ones who deliberately put out a vaccine that was dangerous and ineffective and not what they said it was. That's it. Nobody else faced such consequences.
"What it is, is they realized that any objective measurement in front of an honest, independent jury would, if given that evidence, come to the conclusion that these vaccines are net negative. And that's the reason why they got their political pals to give them immunity. Immunity, not only if you're on the kid's list. Immunity, if you can just find an emergency and can call it a PREP Act vaccine, even though it's not even a vaccine.
"That's the other irony. Senator Cassidy's like, 'I'm worried about whether people having doubts about vaccines and that somehow it'd be a bad legacy for Trump to have Kennedy in there.'
"What he doesn't realize is the country is already doubting vaccines because of these lies. Like the Democratic senators is like, 'You know, science can be contested and that's why you shouldn't contest science.' It's like, OK, what do you mean? That didn't even make any sense.
"It's idolatry. It's, 'Oh, hey, what you're talking about is heresy. And even if the heresy is factually true, we have to suppress it, lest people believe in other heresies.'"
Robert Barnes with Viva Frei @ 25:09–28:07 https://rumble.com/v6g59vy-ep.-249-confirmation-hearings-recap-canada-u.s.-trade-war-bureaucrats-sue-t.html?start=1509
Aleena Kanner: "Also PRI, the full exhale is the same thing as breathing into a bag, doing the exact same metabolic effect in your body, when you learn how to fully exhale. But then the idea is that you learn that and you can transfer into your daily life without consciously thinking about it. Because now you've worked on that breathing. You have that integrity in your core, in your pelvis, and your rib cage. You don't have to think about it. You just naturally know how to do it. That's the goal."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Exactly. It becomes reflexive."
Aleena Kanner: "You're naturally breathing into a paper bag."
[…]
Aleena Kanner: "That's the same with the dental stuff. So we wear this appliance at night. I give it to my patient. They'll wear it at night, and then after a few weeks they'll be like, 'Oh, my pain is gone. I don't feel it during the day.' Is it because the appliance is resetting them every night? And then maybe they stop wearing the appliance and they still feel better. That's the same components there. That's why it works. That's why it holds long term: it becomes subconscious.
"Anything that works, I've noticed, is subconscious work. Even therapy […] The real true work with emotional work with people is when they're able to make changes subconsciously.
"The same with my work. 'cause you can do exercises all day long, and most chiropractic and PT care in America is conscious work. But it is not transferring over into the subconscious, and that's why it doesn't work. Or maybe it does for six months and then you have another injury pop up."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Yup. Well, the brain has to deem the new pattern to be safe and efficient."
Aleena Kanner: "And has to use it and rewire towards it."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Yes. So it's also a very big issue of repetition, too. It's not going to happen overnight. You need the repetition in order to actually lay the groundwork for it. Then if it's deemed safe and efficient then it can be chosen."
[…]
Aleena Kanner: 'And that's the power of healing, really."
Aleena Kanner, postural restoration provider and certified athletic trainer, with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 01:17:22–01:19:35 https://youtu.be/ZSaRFltisYY&t=4642
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "I think the yogis is one that maybe would surprise people. I think people tend to think that more flexibility is good, but maybe you can just dispel that myth, here and now."
Aleena Kanner: "Yeah, that's a big one. So more flexibility is not good. I always feel like I can talk about this because I was a gymnast growing up. I stretched my whole life. I feel like this is something I'm allowed to talk about and I'm allowed to be ruthless.
"The more you stretch, the more your brain will shut off the signals to those areas. For example, if you can do what we call a forward fold, if you can easily go down and touch your toes and you can easily palm the floor, your hamstring tissue should signal to your brain, 'Hey, like stop! You have an end range here!' Because hamstrings are going to provide integrity to the pelvis. When that is compromised or overstretched, there's no end range. Your brain is not getting the signal, like there's a pull in the back of your leg to stop you from going so far forward.
"And what we see with yogis is that they've just lost all sense of a lot of areas, most areas of their body. There's a lot of ligament laxity, the muscle belly is just overstretched, and it's because they do (in modern day yoga, I'm not talking about yoga from 5,000 years ago, that's a different conversation), modern day, they're doing a lot of different types of exercises in one class, there's a billion different exercises, and then they're just holding different positions for a long static period of time.
"You are essentially telling the brain to decrease the connection to that area. So we're not going to have hamstrings that support the pelvis, we're not going to have hamstrings that know when end range is (and I'm just giving hamstrings as example—we see it in the shoulders, we see it in the neck, big time), and we call that pathology. That pathology, certain people with a lot of extreme pathology on a body that is patterned in extension, for example, their rib cage is very, very lifted up, but they can go down and touch their toes. That doesn't really add up; it should not add up.
"When I see that in somebody, those are the people that a lot of times do need dental and vision, because their body sense is lost. So we have to give them sense from their external environment, essentially."
Aleena Kanner, postural restoration provider and certified athletic trainer, with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 23:23–25:29 https://youtu.be/ZSaRFltisYY&t=1403
Dr. Madhava Setty: "Another big puzzle that we encounter is what do you do when experts disagree? Right? I don't know. I've talked a lot about this, but that's the position that we're all in, where we have experts on one side saying one thing, and experts on the other side saying the other thing. How do you, as a non-expert, decide which one is right? If you were being truly honest you would have to say, 'I don't know. I don't know who's right.'
"But why is one side asking to debate and the other side saying, 'No, we don't want to have a debate.' Why is one side wanting to engage, but the other side is saying, 'No, that would be dangerous, because you might get the wrong idea.'
"I mean these are like really big clues, not to who's right or wrong, but what is fundamentally happening here. Because you don't know, as a non-expert, who is right. So your choice to go with one or the other is based on what? What? It's based on your conditioning. And what is that based on? There's no hard place to say, 'Well, this is how I know it's true.' You're just going on thought forms and biases. And if you really want to get to the bottom of things, you have to address your biases first.
"Why do you expect that an industry that has paid out billions of dollars in fines for harms done, why do you trust them now to do the right thing? I'm not saying you're wrong or right. I'm just saying do you realize that that's the case? You have to avail yourself of all the information possible before choosing. So for non-experts, this is where you have to go. But if you don't want to do that, go ahead and trust whoever you want to. I'm not saying that you shouldn't do this or shouldn't do that. But understand why you're making that decision before you make the decision. And stop telling me that you're being objective, because you're not."
Dr. Madhava Setty with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 1:05:56–01:07:58 https://youtu.be/KzvBjI6fYS8&t=3956
Dr. Madhava Setty: "Thirty years ago, when I was in medical school, there was this new thing called evidence-based medicine. That sounds great: we want to make our guidelines and choices based on evidence. It had a couple of bad effects.
"The first, and the biggest deleterious effect of this, was that it came upon our medical institutions to gather large amounts of data. The way they had to do this was that they had to computerize things. You used to go to see your doctor and you would just have a conversation, and they would write a few notes about your medical history, and why you came to see them. Everything was on paper. They would spend their whole time looking at you. Now, as you know, you go to see a doctor and they're on their computer the whole time, because they're inputting data into a vast database that can be accessed and mined for signals.
"What has happened? Well first of all, you've lost that human contact with doctors. Secondly, once you have very large bodies of data, let's say, you can prove almost anything you want to, using whatever biased methodologies you want to show yourself something. What has happened then is that doctors now are second-guessing their own experience, because they're being told that, 'Oh no, the evidence says this, so whatever you're seeing, oh, it's purely anecdotal.'
"But anecdotes is what used to drive medicine. It was the anecdotes, when offered in enough volume, would drive a reflection of the medical system to say, 'Oh my gosh. We must be doing something wrong. There could be something wrong with this medicine we're giving. There must be something wrong with what we're doing, because all of these doctors are reporting that there's been harm.' But now doctors are second-guessing what they're seeing. it's like, 'Oh well, obviously I can't explain what's happened to you, but we know it's not the vaccine.'
"What's very scary is that doctors now are just going with what's being told, as opposed to what they're seeing. And this is a massive problem. Covid is something that is exposing this. We have to be aware of how it works in order to understand that yes, it's not an infallible system. Evidence-based medicine is not an infallible thing; it can actually be very fallible.
"As physicians we've tended to have lost the art of medicine, which is the feeling and seeing. The gumption that was required back then is no longer needed. We have studies we can get. We can get MRIs and echocardiograms. Fifty years ago you didn't have those things, and you would have to do a diligent physical examination, really listen to someone's heart, and make some guesses. The clinical acumen of physicians back then were much greater than they are now."
Dr. Alexis Cowan: "Yeah. Something I think quite a bit about is how we allowed ourselves for having all this innovation in medicine and science, and yet most of our innovation is literally to deal with problems we created through our ignorance and our use of technology and our detachment from nature.
"And I also think the evidence-based label never really sat right with me because, like you said, in a doctor's office, that's an N of one setting. You want the doctor to be able to understand what's wrong with you, not what's wrong with a population, on average. If you're looking at averages in science and translational science, you're losing a lot of information about the individuals within that group, because you're averaging everything together and you're looking at the average response. But the average response may not apply to any one individual within the group. And now we're just sticking that label onto people, or putting them in a bucket that may not actually be for them."
Dr. Madhava Setty with Dr. Alexis Cowan @ 46:33—50:50 https://youtu.be/KzvBjI6fYS8&t=2793
Scott Zimmerman: "When you look at moonlight, moonlight has a ton of near infrared. In fact, it actually shifts slightly into the near infrared because of the reflectance characteristics of the moon's surface. It's at orders of magnitude lower than what you've got during the day, but there's a reason to call it a blue moon.
"One of the things is that we keep on saying that we have to have this red at night for the circadian response. Well, how can I have all the blue around me when I look around at a sunset? It's mostly blue, because we got this hemisphere of the atmosphere that's scattering blue, even into the sunset. And the sunset only lasts for 10, 15 minutes. So how can the red be the key element and blue be a bad thing? I'm not sure it is.
"I'll make this statement and people can get mad at me if they want. I think that circadian and sleep disruption is more of a function of (A) dimming range, but (B) lack of the near infrared. We fall asleep just fine outdoors under a blue night sky as we do, you know. . . we've kind of kind of convinced ourselves that we need to be red. I'm not 100% convinced that that's true. It's almost like circadian is a symptom of a more bigger problem.
"If you put enough near infrared back in, I'm not so sure you're going to have a sleep disruption. It's like Andrew said about spending a lot of time outdoors all day. You kind of pump things up. You can get through it."
Scott Zimmerman & Andrew LaTour with Max Gulhane MD @ 01:59:21–02:01:12 https://youtu.be/tU7gG-R-fkA&t=7161
Scott Zimmerman: "One of the things I got in trouble for is that I kept on saying that if you look at just from the optics standpoint, the highest density of photons in the body, in the skin, is actually in the short-wave infrared, because there's such a strong absorption. That basically appears to be being used by the body to generate hydrogen peroxide, which is then used, it's in the outer 50 microns of the skin. And that hydrogen peroxide allows us to basically photobleach the outer portion of the skin to get a higher efficiency for UVB absorption, which then allows you to make cortisol, vitamin D, sex hormones and all these things.
"The main thing I keep on trying to say is don't discount even small areas of energy coming from the sun, because it may be doing something very unique in combination with other wavelengths. That's one of the reductionist problems. And Glenn's been really good about this in making these points, that unfortunately we tend to run reductionist-type experiments, where we look at one wavelength or one biomarker. And the body is having to do this all simultaneously where it's taking thousands of different variables going on, and it's optimized as best it could in sunlight to get the best results we can for survival.
"When you start talking about one wavelength or one biomarker, you end up basically missing the fact that you may be hurting something else.
"And one of the things that I got in trouble for was I kept on saying to the sunscreen people, the cosmetic people, what you're doing for someone who has very light skin may be helpful. I don't believe it, but it may be helpful. But mandating that to everybody, all the cosmetics to have SPF in them, hurts someone with dark skin, especially at higher latitudes. They're struggling to making vitamin D as it is, and you're now putting SPF on someone with very dark skin that has almost zero chance of getting melanoma and putting them at a disadvantage, in my opinion, compared to someone with lighter skin.
"It's a very complicated arrangement, the relationship between sunlight and biology."
Scott Zimmerman & Andrew LaTour with Dr Max Gulhane @ 42:21–45:09 https://youtu.be/tU7gG-R-fkA&t=2541
Hilda Labrada Gore: "You said that natural spectrum […], the whole shebang that the sun offers us (and I don't even think science can necessarily wrap its head around all of the varieties of light that could be in there). But as far as we understand it, that natural spectrum, you've said, helps regulate hormonal function.
"Can you go into detail about how you think this happens. Which hormones are impacted by the sunlight, and what they do for, let's say, our mood, our concentration, our inflammation, and so forth?"
Carrie Bennett: "Sure. Yeah. And there's actually a lot of different pathways that this happens. But the specific range of light happens with the morning light and the changes and how the sun layers itself on with morning light.
"So I think this is a very key message for people to understand. Sunlight is never stagnant in the blends of colors it has. You'll have a certain blend that then you add on more and more with the UV, or you add on brightness, or you add on intensity as the sun reaches the high point in the sky. And then those frequencies start to go away. The sun is ever changing, and it looks like there's a couple of key transitions. Again you hit the nail on the head. There's no way are even coming close to understanding what all the frequencies of light do. We're at the tip of the iceberg.
"But what I can say clinically, it appears as though sunrise is a really key time to get outside if at all possible. […] At sunrise, you start to see that the intensity of blue matches the intensity of red and infrared. And that's a signal to kick off this pathway from the hypothalamus that tells the mitochondria to make pregnenolone. And pregnenolone is like this master hormone at the steroid pathway that can become cortisol. It can become all of our sex hormones, DHEA, estrogen, testosterone, progesterone. But it kicks off with that light signaling in the brain, step one."
Carrie Bennett with Hilda Labrada Gore @ 14:06–16:10 https://youtu.be/Fc4vH1N387U&t=846
Sherrill Sellman, ND: "One other thing I also want to throw in here, just as a strategy, is the necessity to give up our sunglasses, because when we understand the importance of getting light into our eyes, when we are putting on lenses that block that ability, we're actually are losing that connection. I gave up sunglasses after learning this, Jack."
Dr. Jack Kruse: "Yeah. It's really important. I would tell people, anybody who disbelieves this, should take either their contacts, their glasses, or their sunglasses. Buy a spectroscope, put the spectroscope towards the sun, look at the picture you get. Then put the spectroscope behind the lens, do the same thing. See if the picture is the same. As soon as you do that, then I want you to listen to this podcast again. I'm gonna give you an analogy right now that I use with every single patient that comes in, for people that don't believe that sunglasses cause disease.
"If Sherrill and I went into my backyard and we planted an orange tree. Sherrill put the water and the nutrients in the ground, and then her husband came out and put a tarp over the the orange tree. Would we get any oranges? The answer, as everybody knows, is no. So what you don't realize is when you put contacts or glasses or sunglasses over your eyes, you're changing the frequency. It's a tarp."
Dr. Jack Kruse with Sherrill Sellman, ND @ 37:24–38:49 https://youtu.be/Wp7Dm2NJgmg?t=2244