I rephrase my statement: if I spin up my own coordinator, can I access the wasabi wallet liquidity pool?
You can look up more than enough adress reuses on chain.
But don’t get me wrong, I might consider using wabisabi if there would be a based coordinator around.
So please give me a hint which one I should use…
The incentives of this protocol are broken. Name one alternative wasabi coordinator. Maybe the chaincase one, is it still maintained? Doubt it. And if there was one, the liquidity is so low, that you’ll hardly gain any privacy.
But to offer you a hand: for normal usage, I think the address reuse problem, Wasabi isn’t able to solve is a minor problem in my view, embarrassing though.
My main issue is their compliance bootlicking. Writing blog articles about crypto anarchy on the one hand and blacklisting non compliant utxos. What hypocrites…
Max ad CEO of Wasabi is of course biased. Wasabi not only has weak coinjoin implementation but is compliant with chain analysis actively censoring bitcoiners. Wasabi is not the solution, it’s the problem.
Lightning is a privacy black box with so many possible fuck ups.
Jam is a good neutral ground but if you want a holistic privacy approach there’s only samourai
Mandibles was quite good
Also Larken Rose „most dangerous superstition“
Agreed.
Custodial services. But I guess it will be popular
This would be good for Bitcoin
I would be happy if nostr works out
Damus
The concept of a private key is too hard to grasp for a nocoiner. That’s why nostr will reach an adaption limit.
Bookmarks on nostr.. 🎉
Test
New functionality
#[0]
Works like charm
Potentially promising
It’s really a wallet i am extremely bullish on. Real valueprop here and a new twist to the wallet game where there’s much repetition and real innovative the exception.
1.9 out? I have to rush to GitHub