If I understand it properly, the mint signs an encrypted message, and the signature survives decryption, sorta like if an envelop had carbon copy paper inside, a signature on the outside survives the destruction of the envelope (that is, decryption).
So, the ballot tokens are minted, encrypted with the voter's key, sent to the voter, decrypted and selected by the voter, and broadcasted to the verifiers. The selected tokens are verified with the booth's public key and are not traceable to the voter.
To make it more secure, a voter would send a separate verifiable message authorizing having voted, which is weighed against the total count to keep the booth itself from just broadcasting fraudulent extra votes.
I think I need to draw a diagram.
PS: This could be multi-layered, too, like onion routing. A Teller service could request tokens minted on behalf of a third party from the main mint and store them securely until they need to be issued. The teller makes a withdrawal send to the third party asynchronously.
Eventually, the bubble will pop and the vacuum left will get filled with a crypto foam, which will settle to reveal Bitcoin 👨🚀🔫👨🚀
For sure. Plus, the pro-life issue is a big one. Life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the ability to protect them three verbally (1A), physically (2A & pro-life) and financially (self-custody & no CBDC)
Serious idea: Chaumian minted voting system. The poll booth mints tokens* for each item on a ballot, which are pre-encrypted with the voter's public key**, and the voter decrypts and sends anonymously to the proper recipients***.
*multiple option issues have a token for each option, and the intended option gets sent while the the others get discarded. I am sure a write-in system could be achieved somehow, but it would have to be handled differently.
**the key is a one-time use key generated between the booth and the voter, anonymized and free from tracking and thus censorship.
***proper recipients could be a broadcast to multiple or many adversarial parties to keep the system honest
*angry NPC juror noises* Orange Man bad! Beep boop! Lock him up! Beep boop!
(Also, he said he'll codify self-custody, free Ross, and make sure the US will never issue a CBDC.)
It'll be a weird scenario, but I think it'll make him a martyr for the cause, and an emergency GOP candidate will take his place. It might break the already conflicts country.
Oh! For sure! I'm just saying the gig is up (for the 92nd time).
He just won. No one believes that's legit and not political persecution.
You're right. Sabbath, or 'Sabbati,' is Saturday, and Sunday is 'Dominica,' or "The Lord's Day. Saturday is the Hebrew day of rest, but Sunday is the Christian day of worship."
We need a system that does not depend on ICANN and the TLD/gTLD domain sale system.
Why does someone get to "own" .com or .org per se? IP addresses are cumbersome, sure, but still...
Can we establish a competing system? Like make a *.nos / *.nostr / *.str / *.otherthings that uses one's relays as a DNS? We could then distribute the records and set up proxies, etc. in a way that is verifiable.
Devices ship with IP addresses, default DNSs, and trusted domain names. We can build that into clients.
The Latin Church in it's canonical language even uses the Sabbath, or 'Sabbati,' for Saturday, which is better than the Saturn's Day we have in English. Sunday is 'Dominica,' or the Lord's Day. The seven days of the week weren't changed, but even as early as before the Scriptures' writing Christians worshiped on the Lord's Day.