I like this take
Who is this? 
About 2400 years since Sun Tzu walked this earth
119 years since «The Art of War» was first translated to english
Go for it, Allen! Your UTXO, your choice.
Block 837 000 is expected about 28h from now
People can speculate and philosophize around Satoshi’s motivation, even project one’s own political views onto him, but the protocol remains apolitical.
Apolitical is not synonymous to something cold, or dead.
People of all political views use it, but bitcoin is apolitical.
One can try to politicize bitcoin, but in the end, it is permissionless by design.
To shame and ostracize those using bitcoin on the most fundamental level, stacking sats, under the narrow construct that this action alone does not live up to a moral obligation, is a step backwards in history.
They are not freeriders, they are simply; free.
The act of solely stacking sats stands on its own.
It is no less an act of free speech compared to other acts.
You say it is «not enough» and that there is «no option» to the obligation you impose. But freedom of speech is a hollow concept without the freedom to not speak.
To impose on someone to act differently out of moral obligation, more accordingly to your idea of freedom, would be to impose an infringement on their freedom.
To stack bitcoin is speech. Stackers practice their freedom of speech at the most fundamental level in #Bitcoin
This video 👇 is a must see and an important reminder about what's at stake for all of us.
A couple of days ago I wrote about the need to fight for #Bitcoin .
Stacking sats just isn't enough.
We have a moral obligation to fight for the right to use bitcoin.
Investing in freedom money is good, but it's first of all an investment, not fighting.
I got a lot of flak for voicing my opinion on this, but I stand firm.
This fight - for the right to use the money we like best - is closely connected to our obligation to fight for freedom of speech, and against all forms of oppressive use of state power.
It's an obligation.
Not an option.
https://x.com/WalkerAmerica/status/1772621131834425832?t=h0Gqpedlap-7ucs_In0Mfg&s=09
To expect others to have a moral obligation simply for using the money of their preference is a relic from fiat.
How long will it be until someone comes along and proposes bitcoiners has a moral obligation to partake in someone else’s idea of «Freedom», that could differ a lot from your idea of freedom? 
Or they create a paradox where they exist in the present, but their origin leading to their existence gets eliminated.
I'm not great at orange pilling
https://video.nostr.build/616209c5d97a0e65eb8172a20266b9909ca3c3fe546220f70224bf9e43b35670.mp4
Ahahaha
Is the Francis-carrying-a-ladder-through-the-airport meme on youtube? nostr:note13c92xrkkm2h598nkf37fsgwtjc7nu8u9j049n06au7wtn3krydysnjcg5w
Is there an archive I can access somewhere with all of nostr:npub1nw5vdz8sj89y3h3tp7dunx8rhsm2qzfpf8ujq9m8mfvjsjth0uwqs9n2gn ‘s memes? #asknostr
#asknostr nostr:note1689sxhxjvqh5pge503s4q0ln5p8nar9macm3mq9ytm7d6adwflts2vw72e
Monarchies might actually make a comeback this century.




