Avatar
btcschellingpt
9b12847f3d28bf8850ebc03f8d495a1ae8f9a2c86dbda295c90556619a3ee831
Bitcoiner Rational optimist #AUStrich OpenSats Bitcoin Brisbane bitcoinbushbash@nostrplebs.com Honeybadger Noob Day Working on https://primal.net/EscapeHatch

Learn to use tools you don't need

Maybe someday, you may, and you'll be prepared

Maybe you'll help someone who needs to find them

Like insurance, get it before you need it right?

Learn the tools

Use the tools

Teach the tools

nostr:note1yekc8dxyxxp5jtgxpxyucx6gv7qz2kzk40yc3y92mn6z2usymzkqfn0fus

Thanks!

It used to be hard to find bitcoin-focused resources, and now there's so many wonderful ones 😃

Only 7 actually:13,15, 22, 28, 33, 39, 41

Must have been using the crib notes from the engineering team at Coinbase

Be humble, or be humbled

Doing the basics right prevents this attack:

- verify your downloads .. especially firmware, AND

- keeping your signing devices secure

Great work 🤝

https://darkskippy.com/

Replying to Avatar HODL

Fuck you make me laugh bro 🤣🫂🧡

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

Most people who I know that think the CIA invented bitcoin, are not very familiar with the pre-history of Bitcoin including work by Back, Szabo, Finney, etc.

I'm not saying that certainly no intelligence agency created Bitcoin, but rather, I'm very skeptical of the certainty that many people have around that topic.

Because, when you are somewhat familiar with that pre-history and look at it from an engineering perspective, you can clearly see the pieces gradually falling into place. In the1980s there was work by Chaum about how to build a database run by mutually suspicious entities. In the 1990s there was work by Back for proof-of-work. As things moved into the 2000s, there was Szabo's Bit Gold, which is very similar to what Bitcoin ended up being, and Finney's Reusable Proof of Work "RPOW" tokens. Finney hadn't solved the centralization issue, and Szabo hadn't solved the issue of better computation causing supply inflation over time, but they were collectively within shooting range of the solution. Others as well. Meanwhile global bandwidth was getting better, encryption in general was getting better (and there we've got an actual intelligence agency contribution), etc.

And then Satoshi added to that work, including the difficulty adjustment in particular and many other details, with a full implementation.

Basically, if someone thinks that Bitcoin just kind of magically came out of nowhere, then it's pretty easy to see how they'd be inclined toward a conspiratorial assumption.

However, if one sees that, just like any other industry, there was a series of engineers building on each others' work until someone finally got it over the line, then it looks a lot more organic.

Bitcoin is the capstone on 4 *decades* of innovation and experimentation .. and it is the foundation for decades more that we’re already seeing start to emerge:

- Liquid

- Lightning

- eCash

- Nostr

Ignorance of the history leads also to the fallacy of “version 2 will be better” which the altcoin promoters feed on

Fundamentally, and i speak as someone coming from a technical background, the most important aspect to learn is that Bitcoin’s innovation is economic (verifiable absolute digital scarcity), not technical.

Then technical innovation is impressive but only in so far as it enables the actual economic innovation

🤝

Replying to Avatar k3tan

Found a new self hosted dashboard called Glance.

Makes for an excellent home page.

https://github.com/glanceapp/glance

Home page with various widgets - weather, world clock, search engine directed to Kagi, bookmarks, markets, rss feed and latest releases of favourite software.

A thumbnail view of all my favourite YouTube channels.

Top posts on my favourite subreddits.

Going to try this out 🤝

When my Dad first bought bitcoin, I wrote this with him in mind .. maybe your Mum will find it useful too 🤝