So if we are now at the late stage of interest rate manipulation causing easy money and mal investment that leads to recession, does this mean we are entering the stage of price ceilings which will cause scarcity? š¤
Just a thought
right so Friday is zapathon days. Mondays now appreciation day??? Seems reasonable considering many people don't like Mondays. Cheers them up!
Absolutely agree. There's a lot that could be done to reduce CO2 and I also saw my old man's ex build a prototype CO2 capture system using carbon as catalyst all the way back in early 2000s. We've moved on a lot from there with regards to this but point still stands, is it a good idea? I'm somewhat skeptical. Did you see the recent research paper on CO2 greenhouse effect saturation limit? Makes for interesting thoughts. If the greenhouse effect input of CO2 saturates below current levels, then there is literally no way that increasing CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere actually do anything at all other than nourish plants. That might explain why the planet was ok with CO2 levels hundreds of time higher than current concentrations. Obviously, that would then suggest that we should be happy to watch concentrations increase, preferably to a plant optimum which would help for trying to restore damaged ecosystems and regenerate soils, as well as increasing food supplies. That being the case, optimal range is 800-1200ppm which is 2-3x current levels. Hard to say with all the obfuscation but it could be we should be considering giving out fines to people doing sequestration to pay for the damage they are potentially causing???
Although it is a good question. It's obviously a little hard to truly understand the science as it has now been fully obfuscated by politics and money interests. However, we can be clear on a few things:
1: CO2 is a trailing indicator and the chances that its' concentration is truly impacting climate in any major way is negligible.
2: The increasing concentration is causing a greening of the planet as one would expect and we have bounced off a very dangerous minimum level.
3: If you can work though all the data and figure out what is real and it turns out the planet is truly heating a lot (not obvious to anyone who remembers the romans were making wine just south of hadrians wall!), then we don't truly understand what's causing it.
My point here is fairly simple. What if reducing CO2 levels is countering a normal feedback loop? If that's the case, what are the implications? Has anyone thought this through at all? I doubt it
CarbonCapture Inc. will unveil the first direct air capture module designed for mass production in the U.S. Scaling direct air capturerequires progressing from absorbing and trapping megatons of carbon dioxide from the air, to drawing down gigatons of legacy emissions and emissions from hard-to-abate sectors.
https://www.axios.com/2024/06/21/direct-air-capture-company-reveals-tech
Considering the data and science right now, what if this is counter productive?
2
N/A
A
Other route is politicians being honest, theft stopping, money printing stopping etc etc. Just a question of what more probable. When we are run by criminals, itās only one direction. The real question for many should be āif you are in charge and have been robbing everyone blind, who might come after you? So who should you remove from the pictureā. That might be the question to ask when seeing the articles about conscriptions and drafts
Escalation to continue. If banks start front running the Japanese offloading treasuries, things go to hell quick. Start war is the easy option
Some of the most amazing natural environments require a good fire every now and again to clear out dead wood. Why should human society be any different?
I have a clear memory from my childhood of my grandmother visiting us in Italy from UK. She arrived fairly normal and left extremely busty!
My memory is of her stuffing high denomination italian notes into a newly acquired bra of extraordinary proportions. This was the deposit for her house that my mother gave her to take back to uk. There was a limit on how many lira one could take out of the country at the time.
With the debt spiral in full "flush down the u bend" mode, most people don't consider the concept of currency controls. Maybe it's just far too far back for many people. Just a thought.
#bitcoin #debt
I started to spend my bitcoin from 5 years ago whilst still stacking from current fiat earnings. Help adoption whilst living in negative 95% inflation. In a way itās dumb, and in a way itās good. My 2024 stack will come into operation in early 2030s and I hope I will gain from the additional adoption I may be promoting.
South west
Indeed. There are always either blind spots or lack of trust. Catherine Austin Fitts has astounding knowledge and yet doesnāt see bitcoin as a solution, only metals. We all have our convictions based on the exposure to varied knowledge.
I do think Bridgen seems like an honest player. Why on earth would you keep risking so much?
It is not often that one hears a politician speaking so honestly about how the system works. Regardless what country you are in, the Andrew Bridgen interview is worth listening to. Remember, there is no such thing as a real democracy if you cannot vote on important matters. We live in an era where, due to the fiscal debauchery and endemic corruption of the debt spiral era, governments in the west are busier writing legislation to draft young men to slaughter in an unnecessary war than they are with considering the concept of peace talks.
Corona killed Colbert for me. What an asshole
Itās the stupid irony of the idiocy of trying to reduce cattle herds. We need the soil being broken up by hooves. We need the manure to fertilize. We killed off the big roaming herds and donāt seem to understand why the biggest environmental issue we face is soil loss? Insanity. If curious, itās worth a little research on the effects of killing off the nomadic herding culture in Northern Africa in the past 30 years. International aid can be a really destructive force!