To begin with, it seems like my prior statement about the dynamics of proving a negative vs a positive seemed to go right over your head. You should actually try it yourself and feel the asymmetric nature of it. Mathematics is a wonderful thing.
As far as your handle, you have a bootlicker vibe. Sorry, not sorry.
But that is where the finest meat exists from our investment.
And yet people never stop to think money laundering isn't the thing that they did that was wrong.
Nosedive (Black Mirror)
Not if you can prove you did your best. There really is irony in your pseudonym.
You don't lie on your tax return. That's not how it works. You do your best, guilty until proven innocent. If they come after you then your job is to continue to do your best to comply. Of course all of this is rubbish because it is way harder to prove a negative than a positive, so no matter what the odds are against you.
e.g., "I did not commit the crime") can be more difficult than proving a positive (e.g., "I have an alibi"). This is because a negative assertion often requires providing evidence that something did not happen, which can be inherently more complex than demonstrating that something did happen.
If you only own bitcoin then you have no choice, otherwise, there is Gresham's law.
That would imply money laundering is the thing that they are doing wrong.
I'd like to thank the school that taught me everything I know. I even learned how to learn and teach there. We punish the outliers that can't learn by decree.
This sounds like a UTC vs EST argument, and people are arguing about what time it is.
Tied with the law of motion.
Yes I buy bitcoin from an exchange to immediately spend for goods and services too.
Anarchy and Libertariansim is a value system, not a synonym for chaos. Dictionaries are used for state based propaganda.