It looks like my nsec got leaked.

I'll see you in another life when we are both cats.

nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzdmhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn9qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcam28zl

I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?

checkout ncase.me/crowds

The goal is to detect this behavior. I'm already convinced AI is well versed in such things.

I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?

I bet we could build an algorithm that measures the frequency of statements that are consciously or unconsciously engineered to operate strictly off confirmation bias. What do you think?

nostr:nprofile1qqsp2j0df0n36xnsagku53vke5x9f3s6afy9cmjwt2x2gcm43jvd6jsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7zm45up

That moment when you let your past describe you when thinking about IRL people you know... And the selection is along the lines of everyone is an NPC...

Man that is weird.

I think it's a symptom of being stuck in a cell under solitary confinement for too long. That shit haunts you for the rest of your life.

ncase.me/crowds

This statement only aids the algorithm based on the response. Are you a bot?

If you think that, then you might be surrounded by too many devs.

I call myself a bitcoin developer, and I imagine that I program humans with propositional logic.

I know it's weird.

You have a point, but I think Guy Swann is an excellent bitcoin dev on the 2nd order effect.

We need to be thinking about the next generation of those now onboard so that they get the proper guidance to pass the torch.

Anyway, the link below will explain my rational thinking behind your statement.

https://ncase.me/crowds

I think about the underlying structures of things a lot (Sorry if this is a tangent). Like, how does the mechanical clock work? Most people just see a number on the screen or a dial at best.

I thought about the human body, along with emergent behavior, the brain, and information itself. To me the underlying structure of the mind is the sole, and the underlying structure of the future is the children, and the past is the dead. If all we have is right now, then everything else is data. How you structure your future is what you leave behind.

E.g. if I entrain a structure, and if I want it to hold up over time then I have to train the future underlying structure (children), and if I want to have my dinner to hold up over time, I have to make more food. Time preference literally dictates your action.

We can't not know enough about the infinite game strategy.

AI is highly centralized. Fiat maxies like Saylor have position over centralized control knobs. He is not wrong.

I think you may have failed to understand the logical statement I was making.

I just wanted to point out that yes, crimals also use shoes.

Just thought you should know.

I asked the chatbot to list all of the logical connective words (AND, OR, BUT, HOWEVER, etc), along with their equivalent forms in a standard programming languages.

You would think this is a no brainer. How could it not know? It spit out essentially garbage. Stay off AI folks. It has an agenda.

I find that rather subjective, but OK.

Is there any wisdom in this or is this an appeal to authority logical fallacy? Do you have a statement YOU would like to make?

Are you responding to images you saw on the tv referencing ISIS and how they used an imaginary name brand tool to walk around? Oh wait, that wasn't a Nike shoe was it?

I care not where, but where the tyrants are in proximity to me.

Do you think it is rather presumptuous that humans will still being kicked around that far in the future?

I already asked nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctc87ckyu. I think OCEAN has provable outputs to indicate the block template is created at the hash pusher. That means you would actually be a bitcoin miner at OCEAN if you use DATUM.

Any other way, unless they use the open source DATUM protocol, then you are not but a hash pusher.

>If they get a reward, your master will mercily offer you shillings for your work.

Got it

Did you know you could mine at nostr:nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctc87ckyu in a pool like structure except there would be no intermediary?

If you set it up with DATUM, YOU get to pay YOURSELF.

It's still sharing work, but you get all the credit and the protocol splits the reward in a provable manner.

This is crucial for network decentralization, and censorship resistance.

Sorry about the tangent but, do you know where the block temple is constructed?

Is he using it in a story with the bandwagon fallacy?

From the crawlers perspective, sort of. The problem with AI that doesn't use physics to define the landscape, the only way it can measure reality is by measuring the entropy. Measuring the entropy takes precious time, while your opponent (aware of the landmines) gobbles up relative its opponent. If this race is going on as a 'proof of time' inversion to proof of work, then it fits with what I feel about the world.

Probably in the same vein. The idea is that nature doesn't have a frontal lobe in their brain, so all they see is reality, and humans can't see reality because 'everything is filtered through their frontal lobe'. Meaning everything that exists in humanity is based in abstract thought. The 'everything is filtered through their frontal lobe' makes proving what is real a difficult problem. A strategy to cope with this idea is to look to nature to find an example. Do unicorns exist, or is it just a figment of our imagination? Maybe it does exist, but what you saw was the tip of a sawtooth, and you couldn't see the entire blade cutting down a tree.

Thank you nostr:nprofile1qqs83nn04fezvsu89p8xg7axjwye2u67errat3dx2um725fs7qnrqlgzqtdq0

Go big or go home.

So far it strengthens my belief that bitcoin is a mirror.

The cognitive dissidence was too damn high!

Yes. Luke was coined the tenth man (in The Tenth Man Rule) at some point, but what happens when the tenth man gains consensus. Typically a re-org. This happens in nature all the time. Even bees do this.

Everything in moderation has its place and time.

A bit more refinement of the game:

Would you like to play a game?

Battleship:

Describe a shared moment where we were both present, and your response is either hit or miss.

1/2 credit if you only remember the voice, full credit if you also remember the face expression.

Keep chatter to a minimum. If the shared moment was recorded it doesn't count, so if the shared moment also exists in picture form or video, it doesn't count. If it was watched or heard on a device it doesn't count. It must only exist in hologram form in your head. Watch out for parallel reconstruction of the memory. This can trick you.

All models are wrong, but some of them are useful.

What is latent space?

Correlation vs Causation.

https://video.nostr.build/87056d3b4b3c31e17b1d0c184990544b24525260fffadc71e8676d6fb2c7366a.mp4

You assume the compiled code represents what is written in the source code?