Avatar
Zach
9e9159423eac7c7595e31deb22641d02691f632f0111cf17951d3684f8133dec
Dad. Husband. Math teacher. Runner. Amateur writer. Fisherman. Mediocre guitar player and volleyball player. We need a new cultural enlightenment. I want to be a part of it.

I’m so grateful for all the developers working each day to build on Nostr. It’s exciting to watch everything grow in real time.

I suspect it’s temporary and because most people on here more or less have similar worldviews. There’s excitement about where Nostr could go as well, which makes people generally positive.

I think it’s temporary because we reward things like “owning” the other side, us versus them, black and white thinking, with likes, rts, and comments. I think it’s only a matter of time before we start doing the same with zaps.

However. We make it what it is. The power to reward kindness and thoughtful engagement, etc. with actual monetary value could blunt those destructive tribalistic tendencies.

I do think ditching algorithms and reliance on the advertising model will go a long way towards better conversations.

This note I sent this morning shows up on my main feed but does show up when I go to my profile (on at least three different clients using the same relays). Why would that happen?

https://damus.io/note13wfx00ydnsszcxc69t4n57a6h5dpdc36697p3n7dm3qvqvlw545s9h6jlx

Since all notes are attached to a person's pubkey, won't long notes show up on all clients regardless of lengths. For example, if I post a 1000 word essay using habla.news, won't people following me see that post in the Damus app (for example). I suppose it depends on the relays one is publishing to...Maybe it would make more sense for a person to have a long form pubkey and a standard "social" pubkey. Just thinking out loud.

Replying to Avatar signal_and_rage

Yesterday, I announced and did an experiment to only like (🤙), and not send or receive zaps (⚡️), though some of you got some ⚡️ in before I unconnected my wallet (🙏).

I did this experiment because I saw that people were starting to turn against likes, now that we have zaps. The zap maxi was being born in front of my eyes and I wanted none of that.

The results of yesterdays testing, for me at least, is that zaps are here to stay. All of yesterday, I wanted to zap notes; it’s still new and fun. I was also asked to accept zaps. Value 4 Value is here for good and is now social.

As for likes, they still felt great and seemed to serve a purpose beyond just feeding an algorithm: proof of existence, read receipt, shared experience… put simply, online connection. Likes are bone deep in social and will be hard to ever abandon as they are low cost, quick, and are still meaningful for so many.

With nostr, we can now choose the client that doesn’t show us the algorithmic feed because we liked something. It’s safe to like with abandon and not have our feed curated for us anymore by black boxes. Data miners gonna mine though, and your nostr advertisement profile will be created and sold. However, these marketing efforts can now be suppressed for the first time ever with the the nostr protocol and the new social clients that are being built for it. We will have to support these new clients ourselves though, if we want to keep our feeds free of weeds. It’s still a garden, but the walls have been torn down.

And finally, I still prefer to reply with 🤙 and other emojis (🫂⚡️😆…) as a connection point when I can, to be more clear, and as a reminder of when things started to get more active around here.

Thanks for reading.

Keep liking, keep zapping.

🤙⚡️

Also, I love the term “zap maximalist”.

Replying to Avatar signal_and_rage

Yesterday, I announced and did an experiment to only like (🤙), and not send or receive zaps (⚡️), though some of you got some ⚡️ in before I unconnected my wallet (🙏).

I did this experiment because I saw that people were starting to turn against likes, now that we have zaps. The zap maxi was being born in front of my eyes and I wanted none of that.

The results of yesterdays testing, for me at least, is that zaps are here to stay. All of yesterday, I wanted to zap notes; it’s still new and fun. I was also asked to accept zaps. Value 4 Value is here for good and is now social.

As for likes, they still felt great and seemed to serve a purpose beyond just feeding an algorithm: proof of existence, read receipt, shared experience… put simply, online connection. Likes are bone deep in social and will be hard to ever abandon as they are low cost, quick, and are still meaningful for so many.

With nostr, we can now choose the client that doesn’t show us the algorithmic feed because we liked something. It’s safe to like with abandon and not have our feed curated for us anymore by black boxes. Data miners gonna mine though, and your nostr advertisement profile will be created and sold. However, these marketing efforts can now be suppressed for the first time ever with the the nostr protocol and the new social clients that are being built for it. We will have to support these new clients ourselves though, if we want to keep our feeds free of weeds. It’s still a garden, but the walls have been torn down.

And finally, I still prefer to reply with 🤙 and other emojis (🫂⚡️😆…) as a connection point when I can, to be more clear, and as a reminder of when things started to get more active around here.

Thanks for reading.

Keep liking, keep zapping.

🤙⚡️

My concern is that, even with zaps, clients will be built that hijack our amygdala and people will gravitate towards those because of the propensity we all have for a good dopamine hit. My concern is we end up with the same sociopathic media hell we have now - but with zaps.

I’m confused, friend. I never said taxation was theft. I don’t think it is. In fact, I used taxation as the case in which government collecting money from its citizenry is explicitly *not* theft. It’s based, in principle, on the consent of the governed.

Happy to give you the last word here. 🍻

I said it was an oversimplification. Maybe to the point that it’s not a useful analogy (?) - but you asked what they meant. I think that’s what they mean when they say that.

I understand that you can price inflation under any monetary system.

I’m not seeing how (2) is relevant though. If there’s benefit to theft, it doesn’t take it not theft. If you steal five dollars from everyone and put in a park, it doesn’t mean you didn’t steal five dollars.

Maybe the best good-faith way to put it is this: The “theft” is the extent to which monetary inflation causes the non-consensual decrease in buying power of the monetary energy a citizenry has accumulated.

This is an oversimplification, but basically money printing decreases the value of your money because it increases the supply of money. Your $100 can't by the same amount of stuff that it could before.

The government wants to spend money on something, but instead of increasing taxes to pay for it (which the citizenry would presumably know about), they print money. Suppose it's 2% inflation rate. your $100 can now only buy $98 of goods and services. They've taken $2 in buying power from you, without your consent. They've stolen $2 from you. (Had they proposed a 2% tax, you would've been more likely to say no, so they fund projects in this way instead.)

Again, this is an oversimplification. But that's the basic idea.

The other thing I like about it is that it can be tried without impacting users who have no interest in it. If you just want to use Bitcoin mainchain as is, it doesn't affect you. But there seems to be a lot of upside in terms of useful projects (zcash but on bitcoin, for example) and more txn fees for miners which will be more important as the block reward decreases.

This was my most listened to album of 2022. Fantastic. 🔥🔥🔥

Ah, that was the problem. Was using my mobile browser. Checked w/ the nos2x extension and it worked. Thanks for the reply!

Hey #plebchain friends, #[1] supports #drivechain and you should too! Read more here: https://fiatjaf.com/drivechain.html

Haha. Never mind. Feed finally loaded. Lol