I’d also love to know . Something extremely light on resources
Because X is like flypaper for idiots.
Back to #NOSTR
Have to give this platform another try. I owe it to nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx
Heaps of maxis a few months ago but hoping there is more depth.
Need to fix my relays and my feed.
On it.
Where is zK?
Harto is here
And that's totally fine. I find the hatred of Ordinals fascinating on Nostr and in general. Maxis love the expression "everything is good for bitcoin" mantra and phrases like antifragile yet get their knickers in a twist because fees are pricing them out of a pure PvP mempool.
It's a little embarrassing tbf
This sounds fine. What's the issue?
You can take a piece of toilet paper, shit on it and if someone wants to buy it then who really cares?
What are you talking about? Do you know how little I just paid for a 4TB SSD?
Nope, it was Lopp and the other maxis who were saying it's the biggest threat to bitcoin.
Now maxis are salty at ordinals because they can't buy a coffee with bitcoin and orange pill their Uber driver.
Can't please em either way.
Meanwhile bitcoin continues to care little what's actually been transacted as long as it doesn't break consensus.
But chief maxi pad Luke reckons he'll just censor the spam. What a sorry state of affairs.
Thank fuck for Monero.
So everyone was shitting themselves at the lack of security budget a year ago and now it's just magically solved itself through maxi cope. Righty-o.
Current #bitcoin ramblings from the depths of my tiny lizard brain.
"Serfs and Sovereigns, Two tribes, One future" encapsulates the profound divide in the digital age between those who passively engage with new technologies and those who actively seek to understand and manipulate these tools for greater freedom. In the context of Bitcoin, this dichotomy is starkly illustrated by two groups: the "serfs" and the "sovereigns."
The serfs represent the majority who interact with Bitcoin through conventional exchanges, often with Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations. They are the "NPC dead-eyes," a term evoking the non-player characters in video games, suggesting a lack of agency or critical thought. These individuals may not fully grasp the implications of their digital financial transactions, overlooking the importance of financial privacy and autonomy. They are content with the convenience and perceived security provided by regulated platforms, yet remain unaware of the invisible chains that bind them - reliance on third parties, vulnerability to regulatory changes, and exposure to surveillance.
In contrast, the sovereigns are the vanguards of the digital realm, the hardcore cypherpunks who champion decentralization, privacy, and autonomy. They delve into the technicalities of Bitcoin, running their nodes, advocating for privacy-enhancing technologies, and circumventing traditional financial systems. These individuals embody the spirit of true digital sovereignty, existing as freemen unshackled by the constraints of centralized systems. Their approach to Bitcoin is not just as a form of investment but as a tool for liberation, a means to reclaim control from centralized financial authorities.
The statement "Two tribes, One future" suggests an eventual convergence or a shared destiny between these two groups. It implies that the future of Bitcoin and digital currencies at large will be shaped by the actions and choices of both the serfs and the sovereigns. The serfs, though currently in chains, have the potential to evolve, learning from the sovereigns to value and protect their financial privacy and freedom. Conversely, the sovereigns face the challenge of making their esoteric knowledge accessible and actionable for the masses, thereby empowering more individuals to break free from the constraints of traditional financial systems.
In essence, the future of digital currencies like Bitcoin hinges on the interplay between these two groups. The serfs' awakening to the importance of privacy and autonomy, guided by the sovereigns' pioneering spirit, could lead to a more decentralized and free financial future. Conversely, a failure to bridge this divide might reinforce existing power structures, leaving the promise of digital currencies unfulfilled. The statement "Serfs and Sovereigns, Two tribes, One future" is thus a call to action, urging a collective effort towards a future where financial autonomy and privacy are not just the privileges of a few, but the rights of all.
Why is it unethical?
"The true value of something is just the price someone is willing to pay for it"
Who are you to tell someone is unethical to sell an apple for $5?
Udi and Eric aren't Ordinals. They are merely market participants. Bitcoin is for enemies, friend.
Please fork bitcoin if you want to stop the spam. lmk
That's a little short sighted view but one thing is true, Ordinals are securing the chain and will provide the majority of the security budget once the halving arrives so you better cross your fingers, toes and nutsack they succeed.
the caps are hurting me, ngl
