Yeah so Bluesky has been down for like an hour. Anyone not on a self hosted PDS just gets a spinner if they open the app. I'm self hosted, so *I* can log in and post, and I can see my own posts, but because Bluesky uses the "it's not a blockchain, I promise!" relay system, I can't see anyone ELSE'S posts, not even if they're self hosted too.
Mmm… I don't like it. Why does it taste like that
I don't know where this Kombucha in the fridge came from, but nobody else seems to be drinking it. Should I drink the Kombucha. Should I just do it. I don't even know what "Kombucha" is. No don't explain it to me I want to be surprised
Say I have a 670 MB file and I want to copy it over the network using SMB (FROM a Windows machine, TO a Linux machine), and both Windows Explorer and Teracopy only get through like 10-50 MB and then freeze up and stop copying. And furthermore say that I can copy gobs of other files to the same server at the same time (like while the 670 MB file is sitting there stalled) quickly and without problems.
Any ideas wtf could be happening here?
Source: Ginny Di
The words "fifty" and "fifteen" sound too similar. Someone should do something about that
nostr:npub1zdp33shl69xr0uq3x8n5gsjykq9upycwh6nqm02c3f6x0frrn0dq42vqv8 The indictments refer to two specific memos written by Trump's lawyers which document the mechanics of the overall plan. Since the whole thing is grounded in a sort of SovCit-like legalist magical thinking, I assume(?) the conspiracy was following the memo plans. I assume these memos will become public in later filings in the lawsuit, though those same documents might have already been released by the Congressional Jan 6 committee.
nostr:npub1gfdrrw9629qxwvwaa3vwnvzhtaqu2c5m9wf6vcwjnmdnhs7hl4jsux7gg6 The British government is currently in the process of passing a bill to make this illegal in apparently direct response to this exact company https://decoded.legal/blog/2022/09/proposal-no-computer-code-in-company-names
This is, by the way, why you should trust *nothing* Google says about how "Web Environment Integrity" has safeguards against abuse. The pro-user safeguards are there to be removed! The moment the users have bought into the program, the safeguards aren't needed anymore! That's how these things work! That's the only way these things work!
I am never going to stop being angry at the people who told me, when I said around 2010 that Gatekeeper was the end of the Macintosh and possibly the end of all computers, that there was nothing to worry about because they'd never remove that third "run any software" option from the control panel
So. Homebrew is illegal now too, then?
EDIT: People seem to be misunderstanding this screenshot. This is me running a program installed by Brew and it being blocked by macOS Gatekeeper. You can see me executing it from the command line and you can see in the error message that Homebrew downloaded it. Although brew is in general working for me, this particular formula's app got blocked. After making the post I resolved the problem and do not need help.
