Ok that makes sense, thanks. I thought it did base on the below.

$ ./noscl

Usage:

noscl home

noscl setprivate

noscl sign

noscl verify

noscl public

noscl publish [--reference=...] [--profile=...]

noscl message [--reference=...]

noscl metadata --name= [--about=] [--picture=]

noscl profile

noscl follow [--name=]

noscl unfollow

noscl event

noscl share-contacts

noscl key-gen

noscl relay

noscl relay add

noscl relay remove

noscl relay recommend

I think noscl doesn't have that capability. It needs more love.

Why are you trying to use noscl and not some other well-equipped client?

They do, but I just flagged it because a LOT of people here are very into decentralisation, and that means spotting where the likes of Google might step in and designing it out, as much as possible. I'm personally neutral. I use a gmail account for some things and a text display only one for others.

open response - ordinary users will never want to engage in relay management. If clients automanaged - e.g monitor which relays have the people they follow, and only hit those, but go wider if "no posts from X for 24 hours". OR everyone will end up relying on the Google Relay.

IANAC - I am not a coder...