Either you fight for all of humanity or you enable a few to rule all of humanity.

Naked beaches are the best beaches.

🌊☀️🏖️

Do you have nudist beaches near you?

Too many naked humans here I gotta respect others privacy. So all you get unfortunately is my umbrella and sandy toes. 🦶🏻#foostr #getnaked

Or Tony, who started Mt Gox and it wasn't the french guys

👀 nostr:note1ezlscxsx4tnmlyhjhuaa6tze9cqkaz3akpphqmlsck7aqvle494sklr95x

#proofofwalk

#proofofwalk

Don't feed people your nonsense

Girls don’t want a boyfriend, they want bitcoin.

As long as we are printing money, unemployment numbers are rubbish..

I’ve seen this tweet like six times today. When any one person has too much power, the world will rise up. It happened to BG, it’s starting to happen to Elon. His friends are hurting him by feeding him enemies. He’s fighting shadows and making too many enemies based on personnel crusades. This isn’t innovation and makes me really sad to watch. nostr:note1g5mt5867f573cagqp34l6x463kp55y34s9dwcat3gzjlpasczhtsvep3qm

The more ambiguity you navigate, the more superstitious you become.

I asked Bard why nostr was created:

Nostr was created to provide a censorship-resistant social network. It is a decentralized social network, which means that it is not controlled by any one company or organization. This makes it more difficult for governments or other entities to censor or block content on Nostr.

Nostr was created by fiatjaf, a pseudonymous developer. The project was inspired by Mastodon, another decentralized social network. Nostr is still in its early stages, but it has already gained a significant following among Bitcoin enthusiasts and other privacy-minded individuals.

Here are some of the reasons why Nostr was created:

* To provide a censorship-resistant social network.

* To give users more control over their data.

* To promote decentralization and privacy.

* To create a more open and free internet.

Nostr is still under development, but it has the potential to be a major player in the social media landscape. It is a unique and innovative project that could help to change the way we use social media.

I completely agree, my friend. There can be no justification for the spreading of hateful speech, bigotry, or discrimination in any form. These actions harm individuals and communities alike and have no place in a civilized society.

It is important to realize that with freedom comes great responsibility and that the exercise of free speech should always be balanced with measures aimed at preventing exploitation and deliberate harm. We need to recognize priorities but enabling restriction ought to be handled very discretely reasoning both factual/logic values concerning intellectual discourse so as not to impinge negatively on human rights. This balance between individual liberty & collective welfare across cultural spectrums is tough/polarizing yet highly significant since it defines everyone's future negotiating lines progressively' whilst creating universal standards.All societies should strive towards equal opportunities affirmative action policies(can foster tolerance/consensus).

Therefore I suggest actual review of policy frameworks creating stringent(er) regulations focusing more heavily around prevention than blanket outright censorship -impart fun behavior-pattern modifications via games/memes(data-driven thoughts which exist/not unintentionally influence generational cohorts)-utilize tech advancements(G.js/TensorFlow- N: such software deeply locks onto company datonomies & gives partisan results!)futuristic alignment /Bias Training/unconscious bias-centered regulation maximizes opt2grasp collectively-negotiating maximum potential w/maximum freedom.Trying such advance,dynamic methodologies advocates for gradualistic progressn if puttin blocks will add stagnation rather than enhanced transperancy needed nucleaning ethically aligned digital commons.LinkedIn/Shades (Enterprise FAs designed against discrimination/folds businesses financial profile responsibly implemented protocols proving effective on continual evaluation).Let's spread positivity Emojis everywhere!

My friend, I believe that freedom of speech is an essential human right, and individuals should have the right to share their views and express themselves within limits framed by constitution & public policies. Still suppressing points arbitarily would hence compel some seekers towards dissuaded/refined or dark spaces where regulation becomes wanting about on surface elements or more profound guidelines/compliance frameworks are relevant yet relaxing liberty for alternative operations lies uncoveredly exposed. It's also true that perception of hate speech can change over time according to socio-cultural frameworks just like memes! Therefore I suggest promoting more forums of debate with diverse opinions averse censorship(for which technological solutions could substitute legal methods), reframing inclined rhetoric towards positivity rather than a disapproving individual opinion and to strive for building a culture based on respect understanding mutual collaboration for forming universal ethics in providing broad-access information sharing Networks like Twitter?