a7
j bbc xkb
a7981953319d42c3bd8d04aac270624e8734814feadc5d5b323ecbf41bff3105
yeesssiiiir

Great - this solves a problem for me as a user… Is there some more material to read regarding this or any way to get involved in the discussion? :)

love the idea - might be a solution for the wallet descriptor / privacy issue with inheritance multisig setups. is there already some thoughts on the architecture?

I told you Zcash is the revenge chain against the current mental derangement in Bitcoin.

Just like Ethereum was the revenge chain for builders who were fed up with the block size war in 2016-2017.

To many investors, Bitcoin is not sound money digital energy banana. It’s a tech stock which promises to accomplish the goal outlined in the whitepaper: peer to peer electronic cash.

If the goalpost shifts from “let’s make bitcoin the ultimate form of money, with contracts, fungibility & quantum resistance” to “Bitcoin is already perfect, let’s fight about jpeg inscriptions instead”, investors will notice and try to minimize their exposure to risk.

So far, Ocean mining has been the most destructive actor in Bitcoin since Craig Wright. The hatred, infighting & division they caused will take years to heal.

Meanwhile, Zcash is just building stuff. It’s technologically interesting, way ahead of its time, but still familiar thanks to its Bitcoin roots.

Zcash is bringing devs on board to work on privacy that scales to billions of people (Tachyon). Zcash is working on shielded assets (imagine stablecoins that are truly censorship resistant because you cannot know who sent them, to whom, and in which amount). Zcash is the Bitcoin we were promised more than a decade ago, refined and improved over the years.

While Bitcoin is dangerously stagnant, Zcash is evolving. And investors love throwing their money at something that’s vibrant and promising.

Haters will point out that Zcash was dead until a few months ago. Well, that’s also when bitcoiners lost the plot. Think about it.

Also, some of the same things that were being said about Bitcoin in 2013 (that it’s persistent, mathematically sound & usable as both a store of value and a medium of exchange) can be said about Zcash too.

There’s a lot of virtue in not giving up… and this industry provides more incentives for developers to pivot to new VC-funded projects. But the Zcash team has been consistent over the last 9 years and honestly deserves this influx of users & developers.

It’s fine to be in denial when confronted by new information. But don’t let any ideology blind you. In 2017, it was infighting bitcoiners who guaranteed Ethereum’s status as the number 2 coin. Eight years later, some of the same names are causing an exodus to Zcash.

There’s also a narrative shift that’s going on, with privacy (something bitcoiners of today fear) becoming more important in everyday life. A decade ago, financial privacy was for paranoid nerds. Today, it’s what billions of CBDC forced adopters need.

Embrace the change, or else stay zidelined and bitter. Either way, you can’t say nobody tried to explain to you what’s happening.

Weird take on Ocean - centralized block creation currently is one of the biggest attack vectors on btc. Also - in all respect to your content, that i appreciate a lot - having Citrea as a long time sponsor makes it hard to take your perspective on the OP_RETURN topic as a neutral one…

Hast du da vielleicht ein Tutorial/Anleitung irgendwo gesehen? Danke für deine Antwort 🙏 Bei Liana steht, das Specter DIY nur beschränkt supported wird, mir ist aber aus der Tabelle dort nicht klar, was geht und was nicht..

would you mind explaining, how? he seems to be a good stoyteller - which for better or worse is a base element to making unknown solutions known and doesnt seem to be Lukes extraordinary strength.

being happy about someone working on decentralized mining considering leaving the ecosystem will be a hilarious footgun in retrospect one day.

ich will nicht mehr malen 😅 - wann gibt es support für miniskript/liana im Specter Shield?

1.) That is the basis of the argument regarding attack surface increase - you cant be liable, if you can‘t tell what a random set of pubkeys stringed together might make - very different from a continouus100kb file.

2.) True, but strawman to the discussion at hand. Same is true after coreV30.

3.) True for Spam - though it has to be saved to drive for non-pruned nodes; wrong for attack surface angle, because miners have policies for turning illicit content down (due to obvious risks).

4.) True but strawman. It isn‘t about the JPEG, it is about the centralization risk inherent due to the noderunners opting out to be file storage providers for the legal risk of the files they store.

5.) True.

6.) Wrong, due to orphanage risk in slower block propagation for blocks including txs from private mempools not relayed by the p2p network.

run corev30 - for me inconclusive at best

https://youtu.be/Ie1D-fWR_tY?si=pLQ3WEGGVSwyw7qJ

This is a great discussion showcasing the same arguments now recycled over and over for the knots vs core debate.

cores basic argument (propped up weirdly now even by gmaxwell) and here by peter todd is: it is technically possible, you can‘t stop me - suck it. of course in itself that is true, when you define the standards for the reference client.

welcome back, creator of filtermemes. it was due time after calle said all pro-filter dudes are non-technical centralists (with a lot of tam-tam).

That‘s fair - nonetheless; identifying the biggest risk to a policy change as referencing the attack vector - not the attack vector itself should ring some alarm bells.

Really like Andrey Arapovs answer below - the trade-off regarding negative impacts of miner centralization, block propagation and fee estimates vs the legal attack vector of running an unmoderated file relay don‘t really add up to Core‘s conclusion. Really enjoyed your book though ;-)

would love to read this - and there is not a lot of people with your depth in knowledge AND historical interest - hit me up, if you need proofreader

just red it - well done - and great drawings. but i was thinking like actual chronicles 500 pages deep stuff.