I don't know anything about that, except that Nostr doesn't use WebRTC.
There really isn't an absence of energy almost anywhere in the universe.
Also, what is "effort?" Clearly it has to be something different than energy or you would have just said energy. But I don't know of any concept in physics by that name. Would you define "effort" here?
?crop=1773%2C931%2C0%2C119hashtag NotAllPriests
Haha your so dumb you misspelled that
I'm not a physicist and I can't explain.
My lucky number is too large to be uploaded to the internet.
What, did he believe that same-sex marriage should be illegal? Did he believe that gay lives don't matter? It sounds to me like you see and agree with all the problems with same sex marriage. Do you hold yourself to different, higher standards than the rest of the gay population? I don't understand.
Er, yes, I know that there are celibate gays, and even homosexual people who have long term relationships with the opposite sex. Gay people have a choice. And what I was trying to say in my original comment is that I wouldn't care about gay people's choices if I didn't believe that gay lives matter.
I love Walmart. Very good for saving money. I hate how few open registers they have nowdays though.
Does how a person feels within themself have anything to do with whether they are gay?
Of course. Homosexual activity wouldn't be nearly as sad and unfortunate if gay lives didn't matter.
If someone makes a statement you can easily determine is false, then that's just sarcasm or a joke. However, if they make a statement that you can't determine is true, then that is condescending, manipulative, and telling you what to think.
Holding yourself to only making statements someone can determine the truth of is a higher standard than just not lying.
Is that just your opinion then? Or would you be willing to argue with others about whether it's good for people to mute users who post unpleasant or negative things?
Then what is so torturous about seeing things that aren't exactly what you want to see? Or things that you believe "aren't for you"?
How do you fond yourself wasting time? How much time do you find yourself wasting?
And what exactly is so torturous? Seeing what people believe? Seeing things you can't yet articualate a response to? Seeing the 100th #gnostr post why isn't the keyword blacklist working dang it this sucks?
No government has ever worked, and so it is absurd to think someone would ever agree a real life government is an ideal example of their personal ideology. It wasn't real Communism and it wasn't real Capitalism.
There is no shame in these claims. All governments thus far have left something to be desired; they left a gap. That's how political ideologies are able to continue to exist. That's why these conversations are so engaging.
Don't spend too much time looking up your own examples and reading the thoughts of people you will never meet. Instead, use some of that time to debate political ideology based on your own ideas, and the ideas of the people you argue with. It may be discussion "on paper", but at least you would be talking directly with the person rather than partaking in a proxy conversation.