As usual, real Capitalism has never been tried. (:
Prisoners need the ability to choose between prisons that will take them. And the funding needs to follow the prisoner. Do this and I guaruntee that things would be very different.
Idk man, pretty hard to rape children in prison.
Also, don't remind me how terrible the state is at organizing prisons. I'm disappointed enough in the government as-is.
Doesn't stop a person from raping in every other way.
Anger is also just one letter away from banger.
Government has the Epstein flight lists. How's that coming along?
When my grandmother was a little girl, one of her classmates was raped. Victim's father and uncles caught and castrated the perp. Perp didn't involve the government afterwards, and neither did they.
Vigilantism is a degenerate form of non-State justice, but still more trusted to deliver than government.
Bastiat's "The Law"
https://mises.org/library/book/law
Rothbard's "The Enterprise of Law":
https://annas-archive.org/search?q=The+enterprise+of+law
https://mises.org/library has many more papers on this topic.
Was there anything actually preventing the rapist from just raping more people anyway?
Maybe their answer is "yes". Have you read the article?
Can't you just allow the instances that don't block us?
Ask them: "if your government plans to treat you fairly, then why do they need to record you?" Secrecy is just a way of keeping your government honest! Only criminals and evildoers should have to send recordings of themselves to the state!
Whoops! Turns out the girl I abducted was just a short woman! How embarassing!
She seemed pretty irritated when I explained my mistake. I want to make it up to her. Should I offer to let her see my dungeon anyway?
I've seen plenty of retarded, trash, and schizo posts. I've never encountered a person I'd benefit from muting. My mind doesn't need protection, and muting someone would just be an insulting myself. You seem pretty insistent that you aren't less capable than me, but what else could it be? Is there a difference between your schizos and mine?
I think it's mostly a matter of life experiences. My wife for example had a really strong appreciation for freedom when I finally let her out of the cellar.
Okay, what if there was a military industrial complex, but no cameras? Would anarchy be relevant in that scenario?
Did I say somewhere that you owed me anything? As far as I see it, this whole conversation is for fun. I'm not interested in hearing the kinds of things you'd say to get money out of me. As I said before, I prefer a more authentic, candid conversation.
It's fine if you don't want to give any more answers. Do you have any questions for me?
So what? I couldn't care less whether you change your position, I'm just hoping to hear your answers to my questions. Personally, responding to people's questions about my beliefs is one of my favorite passtimes. I certainly appreciate the responses you've given so far. Can you come up any good responses?
Can you name an issue with life in prison for child abuse? Is there something else you were hoping to extract out of the abuser?
Yes, that would definitely be a pretty retarded position. Did I say anything about an obligation to read posts or an entitlement to have one's posts read?
I do!
How does that relate to my desire to keep certain peoples' posts in my feed?
