The creators of Mastadon are way worse, and yet for many Mastadon introduces them to free speech way beyond what the creators were interested in themselves.
"Freedom"
Last time we talked you said that freedom doesn't matter because many users don't learn about or exercise their freedom.
My Amethyst account will never mute any real person. Is that possible if Amethyst chooses a more filtered default experience over my freedom?
It's for putting food into the refrigerator at night and making lunch for the next day.
Fatty
Well cum.
Stupid surrealists would go up to somone without any notion of meaning or any fundamental values and suggest that they "choose one anyway." It's as if just because the universe doesn't define the word "good", they think people without values making a choices is something you'd see in reality.
And then when humans' "choices" of values and meaning inevitably align very well with evolitionary fitness and eachother, these dumb surrealists will act like there is no significance to it.
God I hate Nietzsche.
Yes. It is certainly a virtue of cryptocurrency that there is no need to worry about counterfeit money. Why would I hate the idea of Bitcoin being fungible?
See? You have to ignore the experiences of merchants because you hate the idea of Bitcoin being non-fungible to someone. Traceability and tainted Bitcoin isn't a privacy issue for merchants. It's a fungability issue for merchants. Merchants don't experience these kinds of issues when accepting cash you know.
No, there is no need for you to get fucked. It is the merchants who get fucked by the lack of fungibility. The lack of traceability makes Bitcoin a pain for merchants to use, and makes some Bitcoin worth less to merchants than other Bitcoin. As a committed consumer, you are priveleged enough to never have to worry about tainted Bitcoin. And because Bitcoin fanatics hate being reminded of Bitcoin's fungibility, you will prefer to dismiss the experiences of merchants. Am I right?
I've seen posts from merchants who have to worry about what Bitcoin they accept. Are you a merchant?
Do you sell any goods and services using Bitcoin
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqj4pgkf4mmw5uy7w57dvydrgkaarpdwt0e5w95vjgkshn2av4hs8q7mnvyk i hate being fat. i hate being 10000 pounds. i hate being gay. i hate sucking dick. i hate being a millionaire and fucking homeless because of taxes. i hate gaming and being fucking mogged by singaporean 11 year old. fuck. here's my sona jerking off into a pumpkin
Hey, the image isn't loading for some reason. Can you repost the porn?
This response is actually really unexpected to me.
If I was the ADL, I'd either be too embarassed to acknowledge the issue, or too shameless not to call Elon Musk a Nazi straight up.
Let's not update the dictionary. For one thing there are many untraceable things that are not fungible, so that definition is insufficient. For another, I don't need to be appeased.
Instead, I would like to ask you some questions. Firstly, have you heard the term "tainted Bitcoin" before? And secondly, is there a notion of fungibility that you actually like?
Come on buddy, I know you aren't blind AND wrong. You saw my post the first time; I don't need to repeat myself.
Luckily cash is only barely traceable. But yes, cash is not 100% fungible either. That's just another reason why I would never refer to Monero as "digital cash".
Too consistent to be AI.
She really is a bit much tho
Correct, and every user chooses their own experience, whether through ignorance, apathy, or insecurity, the user is the only one to blame for their own filters. This situation is far better than any alternative short of users running their own web spiders.