YouTube does allow comment editing though. And video description can be edited as well.
If you subscribed to him, you still see his videos. But they won't appear on the YouTube startpage or on any recommendation.
nostr:nprofile1qqswjquwzzgkmyggd8dkdu7f586p2dvkwvytgl8rzdkf3udx5g4xz5qppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp07malye What happened with the stream?
But when I link to the video event, it works even in Amethyst.
... I mean, I don't see it in that third tab in Amethyst.
Actually it doesn't. I recently uploaded a testvideo over flare.pub, which uses NIP-71, and I don't see it there. (I am already following my own account.)
nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qythwumn8ghj7anfw3hhytnwdaehgu339e3k7mf0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tch2deau nostr:nprofile1qqs24yz8xftq8kkdf7q5yzf4v7tn2ek78v0zp2y427mj3sa7f34ggjcpzamhxue69uhhv6t5daezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj703s8dt Can you implement a tab for NIP-71 videos? (kinds 34235 and 34236)
Generated with MiniMax Video from Hailou AI, over https://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/minimax-video/playground
Prompt: a violet ostrich that holds up a sign which reads "Nostr rules!"
Testing linking to events with other kinds, part 4
Testing linking to events of other kinds, part 3
Testing linking to events of other kinds, part 2
nostr:nevent1qqsqhazmccv69q2wmn8tzmsmwtl43md0vq35x7n8yqspafcr9stcrpsfew5x6
This links to a kind 65535 event.
Testing linking to events of other kinds, part 2
nostr:nevent1qqsqhazmccv69q2wmn8tzmsmwtl43md0vq35x7n8yqspafcr9stcrpsfew5x6
For blocks:
https://websim.ai/c/cCn9Z3WvzWaGw8TUn
For transactions: https://websim.ai/c/Ot6OrpQqLJhfKn6wS
Btw, for sites created with websim.ai, you can download each page and host it yourself. Feel free to do so with my creations there.
I think I later need to fix the cover image for the transaction PDFs since they are always green or blue or something between.
Testing linking to events of other kinds, part 1
nostr:npub122pnqy3sxlnghaxarll4rywx2jy5d2vf2a52pdguzmdea4wlupesdpvsgz nostr:npub1a3x6efyq88vh5ua2lxknf3rfa2afpy6xk5yl63ht4jqa5c455crsap459q Historischer #Bitcoin-Block: https://mempool.space/block/0000000000000000000182972ccbfabb41ec5c385540dcab2f48c75cf73a695f
Gefunden von einem unabhängigen Solo-Miner, das erste Mal seit der GPU-Mining-Zeit.
10, plus one PWA and three web app shortcuts. Amethyst is among the installed native apps.
Maybe best thing would be, provide as many login options as possible but try to keep it easy either way.
Germany doing something that useful? Wow.
by nostr:npub13l3lyslfzyscrqg8saw4r09y70702s6r025hz52sajqrvdvf88zskh8xc2
This new paper is a true declaration of war: the ECB claims that early #bitcoin adopters steal economic value from latecomers. I strongly believe authorities will use this luddite argument to enact harsh taxes or bans. Check 🧵 for why:
Rather than praising bitcoin as a tech paradigm shift à la petroleum and the internet, the authors introduce the blatantly luddite argument that "early adopters" ... "increase their real wealth and consumption" ... "at the expense of [latecomers]".
Then they go on to brazenly advocate for legislation ... "to prevent bitcoin prices from rising or to see bitcoin disappear altogether" in order to prevent "the division of society".
The authors also model some projections, to illustrate the paltry amount of BTC that will remain available for latecomers. (Woe is me! Conspicuously left out is the reason that has driven 15 years of bitcoin adoption & development: it's simply better tech.)
In all the years I've been monitoring the bitcoin space, this is by far the most aggressive paper to come from authorities. The gloves are off. It's clear that these central bank economists now see bitcoin as an existential threat, to be attacked with any means possible.
Many of us have warned that this was coming: bitcoin as a major political fault line both in national and international elections. Well here it is. It means that us HODLers must take action to insure that governments respect our basic right to hold property.
And no, this won't be a war between haves and have-nots. Rather this will be a historic clash between those who stand for the natural rights of the individual, and those who clutch at the failed ideologies of collectivism and central planning.
Here's the download link to the paper: "The distributional consequences of Bitcoin". (We need detailed rebuttals. Who's writing one?)
