aa
Exodia38
aa902c06496dd51e22521ed77aa9f8b1edcaab329b439990e369411f6b490e71

Hello. Sorry for the interuption. Is it possible to make the "proof of reserves" period shorter and implement the following idea?

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp25s9sryjmw4rc39y8kh025l3v0de24n9x6rnxgwx62pra45jrn3qyt8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqsy9tc0sp6gwgz6ntp7m3f7l75sw35madmpwqkn0s52q3tc79uyhxcd5ult9

I think cashu can scale, but in a certain roundabout way, thought I'm not sure it's possible

If the proof of reserves mechanism that rolls every month for mints rolls everyday instead, then a person could make a system where the normal user would be able to put money on the mints instantaneously but wouldn't be able to withdraw it within 36 hours.

If the issuer of the mint wants to scam people, He/she couldn't do it immediately (he/she would need 36 hours for those tokens to be valid and, by the end of the day, their scam would be detected immediately)

This would preserve the long-time funds of those who put their faith in the mint (because they could withdraw them easily to lightning or other mints) but they would lose their recently acquired tokens

Sounds fair to me and pretty much scalable

I mean, I'm ok if he keeps buying more and more ground. At the end, it will cost nothing

I don't participante too much in the main discussion about the things I know (mainly related to Bitcoin) because I think people are already saying what I want to say (telepathy? maybe, I don't know)

I'm planning to learn cooking and publish things in foodstr. I know I probably will come up with recipes other people haven't imagined yet 😉💪

Meanwhile, I can keep commenting bitcoin things and maybe contribute some posts to the #hispano hashtag

Replying to Avatar HODL

I agree with the statement but not with the argument. People will not get any further in the discussion by just shaming other people about what they seek or not nor by trying to predict what's in their mind.

Live and let live

I saw a quote about that

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq40gdslepnxhd8987m3n46w7kqlhtafe4essa0lv59qjp6dzvt2nqyt8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6tcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqsy0e3ez3l7l0fu5z76xnjwte7350gua282hdlxnh5u8jxdcg6fu4gy3rd4d

Have a good day

Power is like a drug. Humans don't relinquish the power they're used to have, even if they don't deserve it

Hace ya un buen tiempo vi un programa de noticias. Las noticias eran duras y desgarradoras, pero eso me hizo darme cuenta de que no habían buenas noticias por ningún lado (solo farándula) y me pareció raro. Eso me hizo inclinarme a leer más ciencia porque (la mayoría del tiempo) es bastante optimista y trae buenas noticias acerca del mundo y la realidad. No todo es un lugar siniestro, también hay belleza y maravilla en nuestra realidad

GM

#hispano

In that sense, they should ban all humanity because all of us can have kids and there's no guarantee that they don't become criminals in the future

What happens if you combine payjoin with Nostr-wallet-connect (I only know superficially about the two 😂)

This is true, but oversuffering your life experiences misses the point of suffering

Naranja y morado, como bitcoin y nostr, asediando a la hoja verde

Replying to Avatar Chris Liss

Trying an experiment. For some reason, regular posts get engagement here, but long-form articles almost never do. So I’m putting this straight into Nostur — see what happens.

This is something *I think* would be of interest here:

*I heard it somewhere, I think it was from nostr:npub1s5yq6wadwrxde4lhfs56gn64hwzuhnfa6r9mj476r5s4hkunzgzqrs6q7z, who suggested the bitcoin ETFs might be a trap of sorts, wherein once a sufficient number of coins were in their custody, the government would “6102” them for national security.

The number “6102” refers to the Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933 and Executive Order 6102 that authorized President Roosevelt to force American citizens to turn in their gold. (He did this to issue more gold-backed money during The Great Depression.)

Because bitcoin private keys are merely information and therefore difficult to seize from individuals en masse (you’d have to make people cough up information they could claim to have lost or forgotten), the ETFs could be a roundabout way to create a concentrated and easy-to-seize hard money to which to peg the dollar.

As it stands, the US-based ETFs collectively have amassed nearly a million coins, roughly five percent of the total 21 million supply, (a few million of which are likely lost forever.) Let’s fast forward a few years and assume the following (all of which seem plausible to me, though the exact numbers are not important):

The national debt, presently at $35 trillion, balloons to $50 trillion. The interest expense alone on the debt at five percent rates is 2.5 trillion per year, roughly three times the size of the entire (on the books) defense budget. Official inflation numbers are running north of five percent, even though people know real inflation is upwards of 10. Bitcoin is trading at $1 million per coin (roughly 14x where it is now.) If you think that’s crazy, consider $70K is 14x 5K where it was in the spring of 2020. Let’s also assume the ETFs collectively have two million coins (more than 10 percent) at that point.

Essentially, the dollar is on the brink of hyper-inflating, the US at risk of going full Weimar. Gold is at 10K per ounce, but it’s just a rock and can’t underpin a global system where money moves at the speed of light, and there’s no way for people to audit its supply in an environment of increasing global distrust.

The US government policy makers put on a poker face for the public to buy time, but are well aware of the precarity. They are faced with two terrible choices: raise rates to try and tame inflation the way Paul Volcker did in the 1970s, thereby skyrocketing the interest expense on our much larger debt and crippling the economy, or cut rates, make already severely debased money even cheaper and usher in almost certain hyperinflation.

Under these circumstances, where both choices portend a high likelihood of government collapse, it’s not only conceivable, but I’d argue, probable they avail themselves of a third option: 6102 the ETF coins.

I imagine it might go down like this: The administration, whoever it is, meets with Brian Armstrong of Coinbase and the CEOs of the ETF issuers, gives them a very brief heads up: “We’re taking the coins for national security and compensating all your clients at the face value at which they’re trading,” i.e., they would just give them today’s market value if they were to sell, i.e., $1M per coin. So if there were two million coins in ETF custody, that would be $2T distributed pro rata among the investors.

Most of the investors would realize a significant (nominal) profit from where they bought. Moreover, the CEOs would be considered patriots (by the government) if they complied and criminals if they refused. They would probably be allowed/encouraged to buy underlying coins for themselves that day, knowing what was about to happen too. In short, it’s almost inconceivable to me they wouldn’t go along, and in fact, might have an inkling of this end game already.

After the government surreptitiously gained control of the keys to the ETF coins, they would make an announcement: the US dollar is now fully backed by the hardest money in human history and fully redeemable at $30M USD per coin. In other words, their two million coins would now be worth $60 trillion, more than enough to pay off the debt in its entirety and restore confidence in the dollar.

The dollar would inflate immediately now that it was debased 30:1 vs its prior bitcoin price. But that ratio would apply only to bitcoin. Real estate prices might go up 5x, food 2x, it’s impossible to say. The dollar would have real redeemable value for something of finite supply and would no longer be printable via fiat so long as that tether remained in place. In fact, and this is beyond my tech knowledge, the announcement could be tied to some kind of cryptographically unforgeable and legally binding arrangement wherein the dollar must always be pegged at that 30:1 rate. If it could be arbitrarily debased further, there might be no point.

Of course, this would handicap the government significantly — no longer could it print money to fund proxy wars in Ukraine, invade Iraq or shell out off-the-books blank checks for CIA operations in Central America. It would lose much of its power as the expenses of empire would have to be justified or greatly curtailed. And while those that wield this excessive and dangerous power would never go along with it voluntarily, under the circumstances above — facing chaotic collapse — they would have little choice.

There would be significant pain — even my arbitrary estimates of real estate and food inflation would be catastrophic for many, and it could easily be much worse than that. But compared to the alternative it would be like an airplane touching down on the runway during a storm with but a mild bump.*

I would consider this plan completely ridiculous but I know "common people" are even more ridiculous and could let it thrive. I give 50/50 success rate to this potential plan.

I think, though, the US government will probably make the biggest propandistic war humanity has ever seen against bitcoin to try to survive