Avatar
DagzTagz
ae4c17620c9b3a0413fd019fd7e983da43b2081e7169abecb7764c333a9bfff1
🌘

haha I would challenge the idea that consciousness is subordinate to the deterministic laws of physics… the body seems to be a hardware system (constrained) whereas consciousness seems to act more like an unbound frequency waiting to be observed by the receiver albeit the receiver remains bound by their specific hardware constraints

How would you know? You would never be given access to information like that if it existed

I agree, which circles bc to my point about.... as long as it is not concentrated in the hands of the few. Do you see what I mean now

Yes, I will do my best as I also don’t consider myself a programmer. Some of this you probably already know but to build on logic.

As you know, bitcoin relies on mining validation to discover blocks. This is done using hardware that does ā€œhash mathā€. Once upon a time, we used CPUs but now we use ASICS.

ASICs are much much faster than anything else at completing this math because they were optimized to do ONLY that.

But ASICS are just chips- the result of low level builds. Low level means that the programming language gives the operator direct control over the systems hardware.

Bitcoin software uses C++ programming language.

C++ software uses things like pointers etc (this allowed us to be able to basically give our Bitcoin address’ to live at and other weird things but it’s dependent on hardware/software sync).

the miner itself (aside from the ASIC chip which runs the hash math) requires instructions to operate. miners use ARM and I’ve recently seen arguments for x86… but these are proprietary meaning there’s rules to using theseā€instructionsā€ (see tarriffs, fees, or vendor lock ins)

Whereas, RISC-V and even other even newer (and potentially more lightweight) ISAs (instruction sets) offer competition as they are open source models and open source iterates v quickly.

All of this is to say ASICS could be better… they could become faster potentially and whoever has early access to that hardware that does optimize… would be the fastest in the world at validating blocks and potentially other operational forms of compute.

No quantum computer required.

You have made a point! Your point was that you aren’t worried about quantum computing?

I agreed! Neither am I!

I am, however, worried about advancements in hardware that may be able to perform the same operations that everyone equates to the quantum compute capability

You referred back to the quantum compute article you posted… I questioned why as it does not pertain to my comments about parallel programming languages and advancements in low level hardware optimization

Understand that bitcoin core is written in a programming language… this programming language allows for very fast math at a low level (ie, hash math) the difficulty adjustment/ hr is the product of multiple nodes running math in parallel until one discovers the correct block and earns a mining reward

I’m sorry. That was rude and not a way to talk to another human but I’m lost and you’re acting like I’m not making sense but you are not making sense

I have, yes, verified that these people are not full of shit considering they are not running local AI on superclusters

Yes I opened it. I read it. It did not pertain to anything I said. In 2020, I received a university funded grant. During that time, I did a massive deep dive on quantum physics. I’m *once again* not talking about quantum compute.

My guy… I literally have the Planck constant tattood on my arm

What do you meannnnn 🄲

I’m not the only person worried about mining pool centralization. I think that this has been brought up in the larger community time and time again. See everyone person pushing solo mining initiatives.

But what I’m rlly worried about is advancements in low level programming. The idea that hardware will remain constrained in the ways it is today just seems totally improbable to me.

Not because this effort is being put into bitcoin but because this effort is being put into AI… there’s a chance AI labs have already stumbled upon compute that would be a threat to modern day cryptography and broader encryption schemes.

This push for quantum resistance isn’t about quantum computers… we know that quantum computers fall into a state of decoherence if the qubits are even mildly affected (ie, temperature change and/or observational tools)… IMO this is a feature rather than a bug

It’s about hardware improvements that will supersede anything we have ever seen before… the funding for this being heavily concentrated in the hands of a few, ie computational neuroscience and biohacking labs

There are other projects (ie, blockchain competitors) modeling this in hopes of applying it to supercomputing methods

How fast can math be done matters

What would be that absolute worst case scenario of a 51% attack… why would you and I work through this scenario? It’s been worked through a million times

Hopefully these people like reading about whales then 🐳

Me 2, esp when I learned how easy they could be hacked into

Yes and also he always used to make fun of me for bitcoin… not in a mean way but definitely in a condescending way

But also it was $60k the last time he did and lol we see how that worked out for the both of us

You guys… I lost my alby invite code that I got like 9 mos ago. Do I need to go through the waiting period to get a new one? Do we even still need access codes on there? I wanna bolt 12

When I was 8, I asked my dad who was an electrician, ā€œcan we build a circuit board?ā€ felt special.

In 2013, I said to my boyfriend ā€œlet’s run a rasp piā€ 2nd gen. felt like a wizard.

In 2020, I said to my community ā€œlet’s run a serverā€ felt like a God.

The other day, as one of my best friends was leaving my house and I said, ā€œDo you think we should run a supercluster?ā€

Hardware is where it’s at boys.

ā€œThis random girl is a problem, but also helpfulā€