Avatar
Jac
ae668387f74ff3dabf1c8ffa99bb53758d00d179533d7113d5f8b5d2ee570f6d
Agorist The space between… John Nash Friedrich Hayek Noam Chomsky Ayn Rand RD Laing Hannah Arendt Samuel Edward Konkin III

Thanks for thinking of a solution, I chose to move forward even with the ridiculous Apple accommodations, and there is Zapplepay. With the WOS recent news this is starting to feel more like a war with big tech than a skirmish. We will prevail! ⚡️

How else to deal with corporate saber rattling? Someone will have to crawl back begging, either or. I doubt X has enough influence to pull it off, but it’s a brave move.

It would be cool to hang out with you. I like being forced to look up the drinks you are naming. 💯🤘🏻

Hmmm, no bubbles, Campari though. Yes?

Testing out Freerse on IOS. The Alby integration seems to work, easy setup. I have missed zapping, I wish there was a way for the easy integration to return to Damus. Damn Apple.

We have had very little natural selection for a few generations now. It’s not a good thing. There are probably some awful illnesses coming our way, bioengineering assistance or none.

Well ok, it’s probably better to not carry, particularly in an urban setting. There is a lot of bad advice based on misplaced priorities out there! Be safe.

Yeah. Natural selection will prevail in the long run. It would be nice if the governments of the world would stop helping it along to boost their already outrageous profit margins.

I think NM has some enchanting areas and you are living in one of them! I hope you’re ok, I just stumbled on your profile. Glad to make your acquaintance.

Replying to Avatar MichaelJ

Given a well-formed conscience, guilt is actually a pretty good guardrail against bad acts. The intellect has to be the ultimate guide, but the gut feeling of guilt can kick in and give us a warning when we don't have time to deliberate.

For what it's worth, I don't personally think smoking is the worst thing. It's damaging to the health, yes, but so are a lot of things, including, say, alcohol and sugar. Arguably, smoking, drinking, and sweets also have their benefits as well. The key is moderation. The bigger problem with the cigarette addict isn't that he is engaging in a damaging habit, rather, the bigger problem is that he is an addict, that is, he is unable to moderate the habit. The same applies to the drunkard: his enjoyment of drink isn't the problem so much as his inability to control it.

This is why I am so convinced of the value of virtue ethics. Assuming our instincts are relatively healthy (not always the case, they can become damaged), then it is generally good to partake in that which we enjoy. However, partaking in excess, or rejecting the good altogether, are bad extremes. Enjoying a drink or two on occasion with friends, for example, is a good act, done for a good purpose, done in moderation, and with a positive outcome. Smoking a pack of cigarettes a day by yourself is an act done in excess, with a negative outcome. Maybe smoking a single cigarette on occasion, in a social setting, could be a good act. There are always a lot of factors to consider.

Obviously there are cases where the act in question is more serious by nature, such as murder. Having a smoke could, perhaps, go either way, but some acts, I think are always wrong.

Is assuming the beggar who spends money you gave him on cigarettes to be an addict an unjustified judgement on your part? This is a slippery slope that gets impossible to navigate from some arbitrary self appointed high ground. I personally think we should tend to our own affairs, you know the spec of sawdust in your eye vs log in your eye thing. 😏 I think there are circumstances where murder is justified, eg. If I positively identified a man raping my wife or daughter, people who I know and trust to not be deceptive, I would kill the offender with my hands and feel fully justified in putting a bad animal to sleep either immediately or in a pre-meditated painful way. Is this a scenario where satan and hell finally find their justified function in Christian dogma? In wrath and revenge?

I believe in relative attached morality to circumstance rather than the absolute moral authority that sin defines broadly to every circumstance. Assume the best of people and rely upon the mercy of your all powerful deity to meter out justice in your favor? I’d rather treat people as suspect and be pleasantly surprised when proven wrong.