Sorry but I don't seem to find any backing for this graph from there. Also any other source found seems to disagree with that chart, see for example nostr:nevent1qqsvwzfuela9ar5lf4y7pqnyryaz2fj8la69cyu5snz0g29pr47upjspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyzq6cv7fmvgywu2r95wz2cqn7vjj5wng5jv9etactfva486nvn8kjqcyqqqqqqg3l09rv

source?

As a person who is somewhat new to bitcoin and really fresh as a node runner, my choice was Knots. Not saying that I understand all the nuances of the debate akd basing my decision on that, but as far as I've understood, bitcoin has grown to where it is with more or less using the filters and the defaults right know in use in Knots.

If there are no well reasoned arguments given by the ones making the changes to Core, my sats are with Knots. At least until proper arguments are shown or until bitcoin will wreck itself and I need to power off my node for good.

True, but had to move away from logseq because the sync between devices works well only with their server. Luckily found silverbullet.md that also gives possibility to tinker more with my own notes.