A label has been placed on my @bluesky account.

Source: x.com/goddeketal/status/1859785669679382549

Seems so simple, but many don't onboard. Most live outside their needs and buy a bunch of unnecessary things.

The debt cycle is real.

Life hack: Treat your finances like a game. Level the fuc* up. Run the numbers like they're points.

When I did this to eliminate my debt, I moved towards asset accumulation, and my brain was hooked.

It's like seeking dopamine hits, but it benefits your overall financial health.

Stack assets and ditch liabilities. Life-changing habits.

**Not financial advice**

😶‍🌫️🤫

🧐🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

A Rife frequency generator is a device that generates specific electromagnetic frequencies, targeting and destroying harmful microorganisms to address certain health conditions. It is named after Dr. Royal Raymond Rife, a researcher in the early 20th century who proved that specific frequencies could be used to disrupt pathogens without harming healthy tissue.

What’s the easiest way to move to the US?

Thinking about building long term there 🤔

I see people and whole countries freaking out about low birth rates and trying to come up with ways to get women to have more babies… Why don’t you just make it not a shitty deal for women?

Instead of trying to shame women into giving up all that they are to produce children, why don’t we make the world friendlier to parents and families? A why not get fathers more involved? This way women can have children and still participate in the world! That might actually work.

But if you just keep asking women to give up all of their humanity besides this one part of it, if you ask them to give up all of their ambitions in life for children… they are going to keep opting out.

I really dislike seeing WWIII trending on X so often lately... humanity has nothing to gain by killing each other. It's never the regular folks who want to go to war, it's always the corrupt gangsters who call themselves "government" who make regular people go to war for them. Everyone knows this deep down but continue to support governments because who would protect us if not a government? Well ladies and gentlemen, they aren't protecting jack shit when they regularly put us at risk of nuclear war. Every single major system of government in the world today has either failed or is failing, so maybe it's time to consider something different.

Anyone give me a positive #plant I'd on this. It smells fantastic. At first my app said it was Greek Sage, but now it says Common Sage. And #asknostr does it matter?

Yes, temporarily. Largely with no damage. This is one of the weapons. The intent is crowd control.

Fascism is cured by reading, and racism is cured by traveling. Miguel de Unamuno (1864–1936), Spanish essayist, poet, playwright, and philosopher

#detox

The primary method of weaponization is directed microwaves. IE, burning people. That’s measured in 100s of 1,000,000mw. That’s 5+ orders of magnitude higher than what you’re talking about.

Water is good for you. But 5 orders of magnitude more than “normal” all at once will kill you.

Fine - let’s talk man-made non-ionizing emissions within the chromosphere.

It all comes back to the amount of radiation in a given area relative to a mass. Even the “bioinitiative” group follows this. What’s being debated, then, is the amount of energy being radiated.

Non-ionizing radiation cannot alter the chemical bonds in, well, anything outside of heating them up (the vibration you mentioned).

The original post was surrounding Bluetooth headphones, so then let’s limit this to the 2.4ghz band of the UHF range.

BT headphones give off, at most, 100mw of radiation, having a typical range of .01mw - 100mw (-20db to 20db). Typically WiFi APs start around 100mw and some can go as higher than 1000mw. Then there are typically multiple radios per AP. This is not speak of the dozens of radios surrounding in various devices surrounding most people for the last 20 years.

Add up the amount of radiation anyone around any kind of data stream is receiving and its multiples of what any BT buds are giving off. Most of the time, BT buds are operating in the 1-10mw range. Now, I grant that the “bioinitiative” group calls this a “severe hazard”… but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I can hear the “proximity” argument already. That requires you to also then factor in body mass and absorption rate. Soecific absorbtion is measured in 1000’s of mw per kg. Magnitudes higher than what we are talking about.

And again, let’s not forget the basic principle - absorbtion in the form of heat. As in burns. There is no other absorption for non-ionizing radiation, which is everything longer than ultraviolet.

Do you feel a constant burning on your skin when you wear ear buds? How about your phone on your head? What about 10 phones? While standing near a WiFi AP, near a cell tower running at 2.1ghz?

Sorry. This makes no fucking sense. Even from a first principles perspective, it doesn’t add up.

Fine - let’s talk man-made non-ionizing emissions within the chromosphere.

It all comes back to the amount of radiation in a given area relative to a mass. Even the “bioinitiative” group follows this. What’s being debated, then, is the amount of energy being radiated.

Non-ionizing radiation cannot alter the chemical bonds in, well, anything outside of heating them up (the vibration you mentioned).

The original post was surrounding Bluetooth headphones, so then let’s limit this to the 2.4ghz band of the UHF range.

BT headphones give off, at most, 100mw of radiation, having a typical range of .01mw - 100mw (-20db to 20db). Typically WiFi APs start around 100mw and some can go as higher than 1000mw. Then there are typically multiple radios per AP. This is not speak of the dozens of radios surrounding in various devices surrounding most people for the last 20 years.

Add up the amount of radiation anyone around any kind of data stream is receiving and its multiples of what any BT buds are giving off. Most of the time, BT buds are operating in the 1-10mw range. Now, I grant that the “bioinitiative” group calls this a “severe hazard”… but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I can hear the “proximity” argument already. That requires you to also then factor in body mass and absorption rate. Soecific absorbtion is measured in 1000’s of mw per kg. Magnitudes higher than what we are talking about.

And again, let’s not forget the basic principle - absorbtion in the form of heat. As in burns. There is no other absorption for non-ionizing radiation, which is everything longer than ultraviolet.

Do you feel a constant burning on your skin when you wear ear buds? How about your phone on your head? What about 10 phones? While standing near a WiFi AP, near a cell tower running at 2.1ghz?

Sorry. This makes no fucking sense. Even from a first principles perspective, it doesn’t add up.

Pseudo science

If, per the link, “exposure to low-intensity ELF-EMF/Static Fields and RFR at levels allowable under current federal public safety limits pose health risks”, then why doesn’t the ridiculously high exposure to that same radiation during high summer, solar storms, etc produce magnified effects? Why don’t we have centuries of evidence of continuous neurological decline and genetic decay?

Where are the mutants?

Thanks for filling in that blank.

Still, PCR isn't fit for what they claim, especially with the high cycle threshold they used. It was such fraud, and I don't think they will be held accountable for it, but we'll see how it plays out.