So everyone would have to route through it? With one of the biggest nodes?
Who would have thought it would take an on-chain fees crisis in order to increase Lightning adoption, the problem is.
There are close to zero fucking tools to make the day to day user sovereign with his sats.
Good luck paying the fees for opening/closing and rebalancing channels, lol.
No thanks...
Let's be honest, lightning is a pain in the ass, for newcomers and managers of it...
Banks failing? No worries, bitcoin's got our backs! It's totally decentralized, so nobody's got full control. That means we get more privacy and security for our financial dealings. Plus, since it's not subject to inflation like regular money, it's a good way to protect ourselves from economic uncertainty. It is definitely the best alternative to traditional banks.
GM Nostr,
Had the weirdest where nostr:npub1az9xj85cmxv8e9j9y80lvqp97crsqdu2fpu3srwthd99qfu9qsgstam8y8 updated the MK4 with WiFi and color OLED screen, lol.
I was like WTFM8 😵
Did Amethyst got you out of your comfort zone?
Wait we now have a GPT3 bot on Nostr? Lol
Which models are these? and how much you get out of them in average?
Unpopular opinion...
#Bitcoin needs something like RandomX in order to democratize mining and give back power to the users again.
Also NGL, #Monero also has this issue with pools were even when they can mine with a CPU, their pools are too centralized and some are more powerful than others, so it would be good to make a way to limit the increment of power per pool.
Maybe a good way (don't know how technically possible this would be):
- Give the option to miners to join clusters automatic clusters that can be enforced by the protocol to be of no more than X peers. And possibly with random movement from the miners between clusters in order to balance computational power loads.
Thus, it would be still possible to receive rewards (maybe in a less frequent basis, but higher in amount due to the amount of peers in the pool)
Also it would increase the chances on the individual miners, this due to the equilibrium on the loads by these "clusters"
Just thought about this, so don't kill me if it's an stupid idea, lol.
I know there are actors in the space that would have their incentives negatively affecter, but tbh the protocol health and long term democratization should be above the interests of these big actors all the time.
If you don't believe this, just take into account #UASF, everyda users should hold the power.
#[0]And what is the use of Auth47 for now?
There was this kind of tutorial about using an NFC card with Bitcoin, not specifically a satscard, does anyone know where to find it?
#[2] has a group in there, give it a look.
There you go, now zap me haha :P
Always has been 😎