Profile: b0611396...

Replying to Avatar lain

Idiots like these are the reason why big tech and local governments have been accruing so much unchecked power over the last two decades.

Can they truly be considered fossfucks though if they're using Github for anything other than a mirror?

Everyone on poast is autistic, so you all should really.

Replying to a6642c96...

I've no sympathy for people who try to put me on blast and then course-correct by deleting/unlisting their posts after accidentally broadcasting that they support MAPs or fictional sexual abuse.

- nostr:npub1kps389j3dny4hfsjp785tk775290wsg836c0lfq5tmhcv54c6vgsr8ntnt

I never deleted any post declaring support or otherwise for anything, posts you're mentioning weren't declaring support for anything and were deleted due to their sensitive nature, but okay.

But let's make a post for now so you don't have to point that again:

I do not have a paraphilia that could put me in jail for practicing it, yet, for me, a crime of thought doesn't exist and shouldn't. No one is getting abused from someone's attractions only and I couldn't care less what people are into. Yes, abusers should be put in jail (at least), but people spamming questionable content on social media is not an abuse. I don't see gay people raping other men just because they have seen gay furry porn or something, the same goes for every other attraction.

Do you think my 65-or-so years old abuser was into lolicon in 2013?

Now get your redpilled edgelord transphobic ass out of my profile along with your poast nazi friends and get a job or something

I’ve mentioned on numerous occasions to nostr:npub1ang74lhyplg27w6rjxt5t25yftvyf63due4qn7jfzrftc3jzhp8sy7vfxh that the material itself is not abuse but has the potential to produce new abusers by encouraging the development of paraphilias.

Do I think Lolicon should be made illegal?

Yes.

Should Lolicon be regarded the same as actual CSAM material?

No.

If you want to draw Lolicon as part of ‘muh freedom of expression‘ then you’re free to do that, doesn’t make you any less of a weirdo, but I draw the line at the distribution of it. Do you think it’s just a coincidence that there happens to be a lot of beastiality amongst furries?

It’s because their paraphilia has been enabled through their unfettered access to material portraying the abuse of animals or those sharing their likeness. There is a direct correlation between that and beastality and Lolicon and paedophilia which is why I don’t believe that Lolicon should be made legal or allowed to be distributed.

I’ve hinted on a couple of occasions that I’m a libertarian, and as a Libertarian, you can imagine I’m adverse to the notion of a government with overreaching authority.

But that is one of the few exceptions I’m willing to make to ensure a safer future for our childhood, one in which they aren’t subject to the same things you were.

I'm gonna need a full version of that video, some fascinating shit th.

Should spin up a server so I'll have an excuse to be a nuisance on there too. That and I suppose other peeps from the Fediverse could join you I guess.

Ofc it is, it's what demons do.

Sounds gay.

Don’t de-federate with Mastodon.art just because the instance operator is a cunt. While I do understand the pragmatism behind defederating with degenerate instances like those to protect your community from abusive people, you need to remember that you also risk doing so at the exclusion of many others that have done nothing else wrong.

Fediblocking is often used as the first line of defense to such an extent that the greater Fediverse pokes fun at Mastodon instances for facilitating block-happy echo chambers. While I do agree that such an extreme measure will have to be taken eventually, I do think that responsible communities should treat it for it is, an absolute last resort that should be used when all other avenues have been exhausted. I.E, communicating with the instance’s administration first, performing a risk assessment on the ratio of genuinely malicious to non-malicious users before then taking action to fediblock.

Calling someone a slur or making a statement that may not sit well or otherwise align with your values are not reasons to #fediblock entire instances. I know plenty of good people among “the usual suspects“ that I actively associate with because the few degenerates among them do not represent their instance in its entirety. I truly do wish more #mastodon users and instances would understand that is rather than going on to fediblock entire instances over one person for guilt by association.

We’re in the current year people, not the Paleolithic era. Identify this nonsense for the tribalism for what it is and work on moving past it.

Me yesterday after realized I'd have to walk a mile and a half down to my college campus and then back uphill after doing the same the previous day.

Why do cisgender people feel the need to specify that they aren't trans in their profiles.

Most tend to be trans, mentally ill, or professors.