Brazil Court Suspends Telegram Messaging App In Neo-Nazi Probe
https://www.barrons.com/news/brazil-court-suspends-telegram-messaging-app-in-neo-nazi-probe-dea4c8cf
In which case someone’s always free to run their own relay and only send posts there, and connect to a few others and have those set to read only (in clients that support that).
#[0] are there plans for the nostr.watch api to provide uptime data?
ask for ownership, you can send a request to Relay to delete certain posts
when you connect to a relay the information on your profile and all posts made after connecting to that Relay will live on it
Another example of AT Protocol/Bluesky's confusing "open protocol but not really" saga: pretty much all of the web clients listed in their AT Protocol repo don't even have the ability to create an account, only login to an existing one.
So how do you create an account, you ask? You need to get an invite to the Bluesky client to create your account first, then you can use any of these other web clients. That would be like requiring an invite to Damus in order to be able to use any of the nostr web clients.
One of these happens to be where I was born and raised, take a wild guess which :P

😂 i’m def showing this to my wife when i get home and asking if patients do that to her
Wow, end of an era. Farewell to #BedBathandBeyond

When are you releasing NIP94Coin?
Migrating between AT Protocol instances is definitely more streamlined than how it is for Mastodon, but that’s about it.
Even if the dev community around BlueSky/AT Protocol grows and there are lots of clients, I can’t get past the fact that it basically uses a slightly modified version of Fediverse instances.
That means the same problems will exist involving centralization of user base around a few overloaded instances, and the whole “instance administrator acts as a feudal lord” and “instance can’t afford to operate at this scale” issues.
Even if it’s easy to migrate between instances, the vast majority of casual users just aren’t going to think to do that.
Nostr’s model of not tying identity/content to a single instance is a critical advantage there.
Yeah it's better and more secure for a number of reasons. It's open source and you can even self-host the server and client!
https://github.com/bitwarden/server
It's easier to be confident in the security of a password manager when it's open source, since anyone can audit the code base themselves. 1Password is probably secure, but it's closed source which isn't ideal.

