https://nostrgraph.net/dashboard could be a start.
What are you working on?
https://dev.to/melvincarvalho/introducing-nosdav-the-powerful-integration-of-nostr-and-webdav-for-efficient-data-storage-5fji can support CalDav as an extension.
How you enjoying Damus?
The death of Google and search is near.
OpenAI just released ChatGPT Plugins to everyone.
And these plugins can do incredible things that weren't possible before.
Here are 10 ChatGPT Plugins that will transform your productivity:
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/chatgpt-plugins-web-browsing-beta/486785/
Google search is really just a ranked sorting of mass data into related data, returning a pointer to the raw data.
ChatGPT is a more advanced way to compress related data into ML models, where context is largely conserved, while losing raw data.
It’s at least a couple orders of magnitude better in terms of efficiency (likely 1000x+) - yet does come with some trade-offs. Instead of access to highest ranked raw references, you now get access to an interpreted derivative (model) - which is a lossy abstraction that’s dependant on the ML models efficiency in that context.
In it’s simplistic form, it’s actually just a new efficiency in data compression, and retrieval.
Shrinkflation is also an environmental issue, creating more packaging by volume/weight. The packaging vs primary product ratio increases - meaning less efficient packaging, and creating more waste and energy spent on package.
It largely impacts sensitive price point products, which are typically cheaper, and sold at higher volume/scale, again compounding the extra waste issue.
If I have to buy 3x 330ml bottles, instead of 1x 1L bottle… for the same primary product.. not good.
#Inflation is helping kill the environment faster. Environmental funds and initiatives are being diluted, and have compounding less impact - without increasing post-flation funding.
There is a simple public birthday announcement test.
When politicians are happy to publicly announce their children’s yearly birthday party’s with location, date, and time in advanced, until their children are adults - the need for privacy exists. If they refuse, privacy protections must be upheld and available to all.
A new Nostr sheriff is in town nostr:note1xp7ueq09309p3qgeaf0tah0h33d5wessq4qmrkzx4gc4pz7gwg3q58v699
Yep. It should result in a single UTXO output.
You may not even have a real need to consolidate to begin with. You should review your current UTXOs and their value. Fees are also fairly high atm - but always depends on your needs.
Another reason to consolidate is long term storage, if you expect fees to increase significantly in 5-10 years, so that again, you pay less in future fees.
Sent from my Keet
Help me simplify it 🙂
So far I have:
* endpoint
* auth methods accepted
* input transform/options
* possible input validation
* output success/error check
* output value transform/mapping
* optional payment offers or info
I think many services can be defined with those basics. Maybe openapi or some common validation library for forms can have parts stolen.
If you only want to consolidate cheaply, await a low mempool fee rate, and send all your Bitcoin to yourself in a single transaction.
Or the more complex way, you can use ‘coin control/UTXO selection’ to pick which ones to consolidate - e.g. all less than 0.0001B. Basically any that are smaller than the smallest transaction size you perform - aiming to only require a single UTXO as a transaction input instead of multiple.
I can’t speak to the service itself, but stumbled upon Nostr Relay as a Service. weirdly the price period isn’t listed.
Member focused/private relays are likely to become more like mastodon instances. Which may sound problematic, but your data is still yours, and your identity is not locked in. People who want a moderated experience will have relay tools to assist.
Basically, Bitcoin creates custom notes per transaction and doesn’t use common or fixed size notes. Instead of $5, $10, $20, $50, etc, you actually hold 0.38B, 5.74B, 9.67B, 21.27B.
When you try and pay a 28.00B, you need to use two UTXO minimum (in this example) - 21.27 + 9.67 = 30.94B - 28.00B, which means 2.94B change (ignoring a mining fee).
That’s pretty typical, but pretend you only have 30 UTXOs less than 1.00B. To make the 28.00B, you. Now need 29+ UTXO inputs, which each cost extra blockchain fees (as each adds more data). Instead of 2 UTXO, you need 29+ UTXO.
If you use low mining fee times to consolidate UTXOs, the cost per UTXO can be 20-50 times less. Instead of 100 sats/vB, it can be 5-10, or less.