btw, this is with an entirely "new" google account too

which when i go to pinterest and log in with google the account that i don't have the password to is somehow magically the same password

when google wants to make it a UX thing that they identify you via some magic juju and don't respect your physical location to let you access local services when you are in the physical location, i dunno what to say

what is their prime directive then?

clearly i am not their customer, that's for sure, it sure seems like they are trying to coerce me into getting a bank account which is quite interesting...

You are also not aware of electrostatics, fascinating.

No wonder you think newtonian gravity is still a thing outside of children books.

No, I think that you simply illustrate your ignorance on the subject because you don't even realize that mass attracting mass is an outdated and invalidated concept within your own belief system, as agreed to in "modern science". You haven't even watched the video I shared, have you?

The fact that you're so arrogant about it speaks volumes.

Oh, “proving” me wrong by describing the supposed effects of gravity rather than defining what it is?

I asked about the different types of gravity which she blindly subscribes to, to demonstrate the fact that she wouldn’t even know. She effectively described mass attracting mass, which, within your own belief system hasn’t been valid for a century.

I have nothing against you homie. I was a hardcore space believer my whole life.

Electrostatics is a real, verifiable thing. Get a vandergraaff and start making things "anti-gravity"!

It's like a cia hit-squad - they arguing the flat earth society nonsense and spreading more chaos all the while. Did you see this guy's claim the elites are already exploring space in fancy ships? Some wild speculation, yet every post they somehow parrot "science!" 😆

I'd also try to spread more hype for space if I were to plan an alien psyop soon...

You claimed that she wouldn't be able to explain anything. She explained what she understands by "gravity", proving you wrong. Now you want an entire dissertation on general relativity? Stop with this nonsense, please.

Accept that questioning everything is good, but doing it for the sake of it is stupid.

Electrostatics is a far more logical and experimentally demonstrable explanation.

You cannot define gravity, and you have clearly spent no time examining its explanations within your own paradigm. You just made up a definition. Is Newtonian, Einsteinian or quantum that you believe in? Can you explain the differences between these?

You don't even know that your own model has since Einstein entirely disregarde Newtonian gravity.

The same will happen in due time with the relativistic nonsense as it's more make-belief material, and not consistent with observations.

*Assumptions required to believe this statement:

- sun is millions of miles away (unverifiable)

- its light is unlimited, apparently no matter its size

- the way you observe the sun from earth is not distorted from the layer of air

It's not a disk but a topographical plane.

Gravity is a theory trying to explain *why* the natural phenomenon of denser things falling down through less denser medium is true.

It's irrelevant if I believe the natural phenomenon, as it's a fact of our world. I can, however chose not to believe in your attempt to explain why it happens.

I also don't have to offer you any counter-theory why it happens - falsifiability doesn't require a new theory.

All you have are empty words and insults. You’re so emotional because your religion is fucking stupid. 🤣🤣🤣

Maybe. So far they are doing a pretty good job at comfortably adapting to increasing CO2 levels.

I am more worried about Methane. Nobody consumes that shit.

phytoplankton are also tiny creatures, but you claim their impact is enormous.

we being much larger and possessing industrial capacity can certainly have similar impact.

Did you even read what I wrote?

Nope. You have no idea if plankton will slowly die out because of pollution or acidification, or for some other reason.

Maybe plankton stocks will increase. But you don't know that. You can't see the future anymore than anyone else can.

If extra CO2 is always absorbed by plankton, then the increase in CO2 we've recently seen would be impossible : - D

Existing evidence kinda shows you're wrong :-)

Explain how you come up with 2.74 miles. The platform is 9.41 miles away (59.05 ft). The base should not be visible and you should not see any water behind the platform for miles.