Avatar
zhenya
b4595f412e11c372967c7713d554b943bce1b80945ae4e3e7523c0515af8307a
What if mammoths had #Bitcoin? To each according to their work. Better, everyday. 🦣 ❀️
Replying to 516add19...

this seems mighty specific πŸ˜‚

thanks for posting this to git fren πŸ«‘πŸ«‚

following it. maybe i'll be able to zap you when it's all settled as well. can't zap you currently

haven't been able to zap primal wallets from alby for a minute. anyone else?

#asknostr

just tried to zap you but primal address are unzappable for me

Replying to Avatar mark

"There is a traditional optimistic story that runs as follows. Our hero is a prisoner who has been sentenced to death by a tyrannical king, but gains a reprieve by promising to teach the king's favourite horse to talk within a year.

That night, a fellow prisoner asks what possessed him to make such a bargain. He replies, 'A lot can happen in a year. The horse might die. The king might die. I might die. Or the horse might talk!'

The prisoner understands that, while his immediate problems have to do with prison bars and the king and his horse, ultimately the evil he faces is caused by insufficient knowledge. That makes him an optimist.

He knows that, if progress is to be made, some of the opportunities and some of the discoveries will be inconceivable in advance. Progress cannot take place at all unless someone is open to, and prepares for, those inconceivable possibilities.

The prisoner may or may not discover a way of teaching the horse to talk. But he may discover something else. He may persuade the king to repeal the law that he had broken; he may learn a convincing conjuring trick in which the horse would seem to talk; he may escape; he may think of an achievable task that would please the king even more than making the horse talk. The list is infinite. Even if every such possibility is unlikely, it takes only one of them to be realized for the whole problem to be solved.

But if our prisoner is going to escape by creating a new idea, he cannot possibly know that idea today, and therefore he cannot let the assumption that it will never exist condition his planning.”

β€”David Deutsch, physicist

#grownostr

what a nice note

if i was still in the US i wouldnt unless i was traveling across state lines.

you pick up liabilities as a CC that you dont exercising your rights with open carry.

namely you usually have to report your address to another agency, notify them of any changes, surrender the cc if you fall out of compliance with rules.

imo, best not to have compliance responsibilities you could accidentally fail.

Replying to 516add19...

the singularity

here is a blast from the past. it was the fat finger of 2021 on another low liquidity exchange

when are these exchanges gonna learn....they must support off exchange settlement in a world of low liquidity

it allows market makers and liquidity providers to provide backstop without counterparty risk

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2023/09/21/bitcoins-87-drop-in-2021-was-caused-by-sam-bankman-frieds-alameda-ex-employee-claims/

Replying to Avatar Gigi

sorry to nitpick. this isn't anatomically correct...

the dirty fiat goes right up the ass.

shows how little liquidity was on bitmex....

what was the size of the alameda fat finger that caused a huge wick? do you recall?