fun nostr:note1swqwngpw9rpq6lk7jpq5fmlypvekznrcjq42rcr4ua5u94y2x6zsvue20t
so for âMedia URLâ would I use nostr.build or equivalent? presumably that service would host the content in the unpaywalled form?
F nostr:note17tvvqfvdslnrt0lpl2y7xdn2c5t2gumqdd9tyy2st9ssw2mxpf2s7lf4xr
entering hell (wish me luck)
Would you like to test my new service? Let's go!
Now you can put any blog post, painting, picture, or anything else behind a Lightning paywall in seconds.
Withdraw whenever you want, it's transparent with full transaction history. You can even use your own node.
It's not ready but basic functions are working, don't store large funds: https://www.zapit.live/
Congrats on the launch! I would like to play with this. do you have a recommended/advised way to host the content for this use-case?
đ°đ°đ° #BTC #News #Alert đ°đ°đ°
Bitcoin scammer admits to using money and stolen gains to impress women as he's sentenced to a year - Daily Mail
Source: https://tinyurl.com/25lzd5c8
'He hoped the visual appeal of the cash would impress a female into having sexual relations with him,' Felton wrote.
'He stated his plan did not work.'
So... things are good?
happy âdeletingâ đ
your Substack email list is relatively censorship resistant, but the Substack Notes product doesnât share that property
nostr/zaps should eventually support good micropayment paywalling solutions
hmm⌠thereâs a lot of depth to these topics. let me think about it, thanks for the ideas!
Thanks for appreciating, Douglaschan! Let me know if there are other uncertainties where a video could help. đ¤
I think a lot depends on the messaging that clients provide to users around these actions. Ideally it can be kept as simple as possible without committing to something that a client canât commit to.
A client can commit to a feature called âeditâ without committing that old versions were guaranteed to be removed/buried by all relays.
yeah, itâs diff from twitter and will diverge more over time. letâs just embrace what it is!
meaning if you truly enable that you make it censorable?
yeah, that seems very likely/reasonable to me
wouldnât relays or other caching services be able to read/host content even if the original writer didnât intend. so it isnât always the userâs choice once the signed message is out there?
seems tough to provide strong guarantees around deletion, tho, no?